Influence of Rhizoctonia solani and Trichoderma spp. in growth of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and in the induction of plant defense-related genes.

Sara Mayo, Santiago Gutiérrez, Monica G Malmierca, Alicia Lorenzana, M Piedad Campelo, Rosa Hermosa, Pedro A Casquero
Author Information
  1. Sara Mayo: Research Group of Engineering and Sustainable Agriculture, Natural Resources Institute, University of León León, Spain.
  2. Santiago Gutiérrez: Area of Microbiology, University School of Agricultural Engineers, University of León Ponferrada, Spain.
  3. Monica G Malmierca: Area of Microbiology, University School of Agricultural Engineers, University of León Ponferrada, Spain.
  4. Alicia Lorenzana: Research Group of Engineering and Sustainable Agriculture, Natural Resources Institute, University of León León, Spain.
  5. M Piedad Campelo: Research Group of Engineering and Sustainable Agriculture, Natural Resources Institute, University of León León, Spain.
  6. Rosa Hermosa: Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Spanish-Portuguese Centre for Agricultural Research, University of Salamanca Salamanca, Spain.
  7. Pedro A Casquero: Research Group of Engineering and Sustainable Agriculture, Natural Resources Institute, University of León León, Spain.

Abstract

Many Trichoderma species are well-known for their ability to promote plant growth and defense. We study how the interaction of bean plants with R. solani and/or Trichoderma affect the plants growth and the level of expression of defense-related genes. Trichoderma isolates were evaluated in vitro for their potential to antagonize R. solani. Bioassays were performed in climatic chambers and development of the plants was evaluated. The effect of Trichoderma treatment and/or R. solani infection on the expression of bean defense-related genes was analyzed by real-time PCR and the production of ergosterol and squalene was quantified. In vitro growth inhibition of R. solani was between 86 and 58%. In in vivo assays, the bean plants treated with Trichoderma harzianum T019 always had an increased size respect to control and the plants treated with this isolate did not decrease their size in presence of R. solani. The interaction of plants with R. solani and/or Trichoderma affects the level of expression of seven defense-related genes. Squalene and ergosterol production differences were found among the Trichoderma isolates, T019 showing the highest values for both compounds. T. harzianum T019 shows a positive effect on the level of resistance of bean plants to R. solani. This strain induces the expression of plant defense-related genes and produces a higher level of ergosterol, indicating its ability to grow at a higher rate in the soil, which would explain its positive effects on plant growth and defense in the presence of the pathogen.

Keywords

References

  1. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005 Dec;43(12):1103-14 [PMID: 16386432]
  2. Int Microbiol. 2013 Jun;16(2):69-80 [PMID: 24400524]
  3. Fungal Genet Biol. 2005 Oct;42(10):813-28 [PMID: 16154784]
  4. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011 Sep 16;9(10):749-59 [PMID: 21921934]
  5. Phytopathology. 2008 Nov;98(11):1190-8 [PMID: 18943407]
  6. Fungal Genet Biol. 2013 Apr;53:22-33 [PMID: 23454546]
  7. Plant Cell Rep. 2011 Aug;30(8):1465-73 [PMID: 21416283]
  8. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Jan;2(1):43-56 [PMID: 15035008]
  9. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 May;66(5):1890-8 [PMID: 10788356]
  10. Phytopathology. 2006 Feb;96(2):181-5 [PMID: 18943922]
  11. PLoS One. 2014 May 30;9(5):e98234 [PMID: 24878929]
  12. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(6):1225-39 [PMID: 18390849]
  13. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014 Mar;14 (2):310-23 [PMID: 24119181]
  14. Microbiology. 2012 Jan;158(Pt 1):17-25 [PMID: 21998166]
  15. J Exp Bot. 2010 Jun;61(6):1807-16 [PMID: 20304987]
  16. Immunol Rev. 2004 Apr;198:249-66 [PMID: 15199967]
  17. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013;51:105-29 [PMID: 23915132]
  18. Mycol Res. 2004 Aug;108(Pt 8):897-906 [PMID: 15449594]
  19. J Exp Bot. 2014 Jun;65(9):2295-306 [PMID: 24642849]
  20. Plant Sci. 2000 Oct 16;159(1):97-106 [PMID: 11011097]
  21. Fungal Genet Biol. 2006 Mar;43(3):164-78 [PMID: 16466954]
  22. Plant J. 2003 Nov;36(4):485-99 [PMID: 14617079]
  23. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007 Apr;44(4):269-83 [PMID: 17218128]
  24. Transgenic Res. 2006 Feb;15(1):57-68 [PMID: 16475010]
  25. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 May 1;30(9):e36 [PMID: 11972351]
  26. Environ Microbiol. 2015 Apr;17 (4):1103-18 [PMID: 24889745]
  27. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Nov;75(22):7291-3 [PMID: 19767465]
  28. Fungal Biol. 2010 Sep;114(9):691-701 [PMID: 20943179]
  29. Science. 1991 Nov 22;254(5035):1194-7 [PMID: 17776411]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0TrichodermasolaniplantsRdefense-relatedgenesgrowthbeanplantlevelexpressionergosteroland/orT019abilitydefenseinteractionisolatesevaluatedvitroeffectproductionsqualenetreatedharzianumsizepresencepositivehigherManyspecieswell-knownpromotestudyaffectpotentialantagonizeBioassaysperformedclimaticchambersdevelopmenttreatmentinfectionanalyzedreal-timePCRquantifiedinhibition8658%vivoassaysalwaysincreasedrespectcontrolisolatedecreaseaffectssevenSqualenedifferencesfoundamongshowinghighestvaluescompoundsTshowsresistancestraininducesproducesindicatinggrowratesoilexplaineffectspathogenInfluenceRhizoctoniasppPhaseolusvulgarisLinductionantifungalactivityqPCR

Similar Articles

Cited By