Polarization: A Key Difference between Man-made and Natural Electromagnetic Fields, in regard to Biological Activity.

Dimitris J Panagopoulos, Olle Johansson, George L Carlo
Author Information
  1. Dimitris J Panagopoulos: National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", Athens, Greece.
  2. Olle Johansson: Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  3. George L Carlo: The Science and Public Policy Institute, Institute for Healthful Adaptation, Washington, DC, USA.

Abstract

In the present study we analyze the role of polarization in the biological activity of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs)/Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). All types of man-made EMFs/EMR - in contrast to natural EMFs/EMR - are polarized. Polarized EMFs/EMR can have increased biological activity, due to: 1) Ability to produce constructive interference effects and amplify their intensities at many locations. 2) Ability to force all charged/polar molecules and especially free ions within and around all living cells to oscillate on parallel planes and in phase with the applied polarized field. Such ionic forced-oscillations exert additive electrostatic forces on the sensors of cell membrane electro-sensitive ion channels, resulting in their irregular gating and consequent disruption of the cell's electrochemical balance. These features render man-made EMFs/EMR more bioactive than natural non-ionizing EMFs/EMR. This explains the increasing number of biological effects discovered during the past few decades to be induced by man-made EMFs, in contrast to natural EMFs in the terrestrial environment which have always been present throughout evolution, although human exposure to the latter ones is normally of significantly higher intensities/energy and longer durations. Thus, polarization seems to be a trigger that significantly increases the probability for the initiation of biological/health effects.

References

  1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000 Jun 16;272(3):634-40 [PMID: 10860806]
  2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002 Oct 18;298(1):95-102 [PMID: 12379225]
  3. Nature. 1986 Mar 13-19;320(6058):188-92 [PMID: 3754035]
  4. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):205-16 [PMID: 19264460]
  5. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2002;80:1-395 [PMID: 12071196]
  6. Surg Neurol. 2009 Sep;72(3):205-14; discussion 214-5 [PMID: 19328536]
  7. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e62663 [PMID: 23750202]
  8. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010 May;86(5):345-57 [PMID: 20397839]
  9. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013 Nov;67(2):703-16 [PMID: 23526156]
  10. Int Rev Cytol. 1995;158:279-338 [PMID: 7721540]
  11. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):79-88 [PMID: 19264461]
  12. J Physiol. 1952 Aug;117(4):500-44 [PMID: 12991237]
  13. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1993 May-Jun;14(3):319-35 [PMID: 8360237]
  14. Nature. 1991 Oct 24;353(6346):752-6 [PMID: 1944534]
  15. Appl Opt. 2006 Aug 1;45(22):5582-9 [PMID: 16855654]
  16. J Cell Mol Med. 2013 Aug;17(8):958-65 [PMID: 23802593]
  17. Pathophysiology. 2009 Aug;16(2-3):157-77 [PMID: 19398310]
  18. Bioelectromagnetics. 1997;18(2):132-41 [PMID: 9084864]
  19. Genome Biol. 2000;1(4):REVIEWS0004 [PMID: 11178249]
  20. Bioelectromagnetics. 1988;9(2):183-94 [PMID: 3377866]
  21. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2013;102(Pt 2):1-460 [PMID: 24772662]
  22. J Appl Physiol. 1968 May;24(5):717-21 [PMID: 5647653]
  23. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2010 Oct;11(10):801-5 [PMID: 20872988]
  24. Science. 1987 Jun 12;236(4807):1465-9 [PMID: 3589667]

MeSH Term

Cell Membrane
Electromagnetic Fields
Electromagnetic Radiation
Equipment Design
Humans
Ion Channel Gating
Ion Channels
Time Factors

Chemicals

Ion Channels

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EMFs/EMRbiologicalEMFsman-madenaturaleffectspresentpolarizationactivityElectromagneticFields-contrastpolarizedAbilitysignificantlystudyanalyzerole/ElectromagneticRadiationEMRtypesPolarizedcanincreaseddueto:1produceconstructiveinterferenceamplifyintensitiesmanylocations2forcecharged/polarmoleculesespeciallyfreeionswithinaroundlivingcellsoscillateparallelplanesphaseappliedfieldionicforced-oscillationsexertadditiveelectrostaticforcessensorscellmembraneelectro-sensitiveionchannelsresultingirregulargatingconsequentdisruptioncell'selectrochemicalbalancefeaturesrenderbioactivenon-ionizingexplainsincreasingnumberdiscoveredpastdecadesinducedterrestrialenvironmentalwaysthroughoutevolutionalthoughhumanexposurelatteronesnormallyhigherintensities/energylongerdurationsThusseemstriggerincreasesprobabilityinitiationbiological/healthPolarization:KeyDifferenceMan-madeNaturalregardBiologicalActivity

Similar Articles

Cited By (21)