Pathological Buying Online as a Specific Form of Internet Addiction: A Model-Based Experimental Investigation.

Patrick Trotzke, Katrin Starcke, Astrid Müller, Matthias Brand
Author Information
  1. Patrick Trotzke: Department of General Psychology: Cognition, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
  2. Katrin Starcke: Department of General Psychology: Cognition, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
  3. Astrid Müller: Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  4. Matthias Brand: Department of General Psychology: Cognition, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany; Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Essen, Germany.

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate different factors of vulnerability for Pathological buying in the online context and to determine whether online Pathological buying has parallels to a specific Internet addiction. According to a model of specific Internet addiction by Brand and colleagues, potential vulnerability factors may consist of a predisposing excitability from shopping and as mediating variable, specific Internet use expectancies. Additionally, in line with models on addiction behavior, cue-induced craving should also constitute an important factor for online Pathological buying. The theoretical model was tested in this study by investigating 240 female participants with a cue-reactivity paradigm, which was composed of online shopping pictures, to assess excitability from shopping. craving (before and after the cue-reactivity paradigm) and online shopping expectancies were measured. The tendency for Pathological buying and online Pathological buying were screened with the Compulsive Buying Scale (CBS) and the Short Internet addiction Test modified for shopping (s-IATshopping). The results demonstrated that the relationship between individual's excitability from shopping and online Pathological buying tendency was partially mediated by specific Internet use expectancies for online shopping (model's R² = .742, p < .001). Furthermore, craving and online Pathological buying tendencies were correlated (r = .556, p < .001), and an increase in craving after the cue presentation was observed solely in individuals scoring high for online Pathological buying (t(28) = 2.98, p < .01, d = 0.44). Both screening instruments were correlated (r = .517, p < .001), and diagnostic concordances as well as divergences were indicated by applying the proposed cut-off criteria. In line with the model for specific Internet addiction, the study identified potential vulnerability factors for online Pathological buying and suggests potential parallels. The presence of craving in individuals with a propensity for online Pathological buying emphasizes that this behavior merits potential consideration within the non-substance/behavioral addictions.

References

  1. J Clin Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;55(6):242-8 [PMID: 8071278]
  2. J Sex Res. 2013;50(7):642-52 [PMID: 23167900]
  3. Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 11;5:1256 [PMID: 25426088]
  4. Cyberpsychol Behav. 1999;2(5):475-9 [PMID: 19178220]
  5. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82 [PMID: 3806354]
  6. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Nov 30;219(3):411-9 [PMID: 25023363]
  7. Addiction. 1999 Mar;94(3):327-40 [PMID: 10605857]
  8. CNS Spectr. 2007 Feb;12(2):124-32 [PMID: 17277712]
  9. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2009 Mar-Apr;16(2):83-99 [PMID: 19229837]
  10. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;27(4):563-79 [PMID: 12787841]
  11. Psychosom Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;76(9):694-700 [PMID: 25393125]
  12. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005 Dec 5;526(1-3):199-206 [PMID: 16256105]
  13. Addiction. 2000 Aug;95 Suppl 2:S129-44 [PMID: 11002908]
  14. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1994 May;16(3):205-12 [PMID: 8063088]
  15. Compr Psychiatry. 2011 Jan-Feb;52(1):50-5 [PMID: 21220065]
  16. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Oct 12;363(1507):3137-46 [PMID: 18640920]
  17. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2000;107(6):715-20 [PMID: 10943911]
  18. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 27;8:375 [PMID: 24904393]
  19. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Apr;17(4):407-21 [PMID: 25762750]
  20. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011 Jun;14(6):371-7 [PMID: 21117979]
  21. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(25):4026-52 [PMID: 24001297]
  22. Am J Addict. 2015 Mar;24(2):132-7 [PMID: 25864601]
  23. Behav Neurosci. 2007 Jun;121(3):614-8 [PMID: 17592953]
  24. Psychiatry Res. 2010 Dec 30;180(2-3):137-42 [PMID: 20494451]
  25. J Behav Addict. 2013 Jun;2(2):100-7 [PMID: 26165929]
  26. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;163(10):1670-2 [PMID: 17012670]
  27. CNS Drugs. 2001 Jan;15(1):17-27 [PMID: 11465011]
  28. Psychiatry Res. 2010 Jul 30;178(2):348-53 [PMID: 20471099]
  29. Addiction. 2001 Jan;96(1):33-46 [PMID: 11177518]
  30. Psychiatry Res. 2011 Aug 15;188(3):428-33 [PMID: 21641048]
  31. Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):575-80 [PMID: 22560059]
  32. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;34(1):1-9 [PMID: 12763389]
  33. Addict Behav. 2014 Dec;39(12):1827-30 [PMID: 25128635]
  34. Addiction. 1998 Jul;93(7):1091-102 [PMID: 9744139]
  35. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2012 Mar;20(2):126-31 [PMID: 21710571]
  36. Appetite. 2012 Oct;59(2):591-600 [PMID: 22824054]
  37. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2001;108(7):887-94 [PMID: 11515754]
  38. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Jan;34(1):87-107 [PMID: 19632269]
  39. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:425924 [PMID: 25097858]
  40. J Clin Psychiatry. 1994 Jan;55(1):5-11 [PMID: 8294395]
  41. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Apr;35(5):1209-25 [PMID: 20090671]
  42. Psychometrika. 1965 Jun;30:179-85 [PMID: 14306381]
  43. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;60(8):828-36 [PMID: 12912766]
  44. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Nov 15;58(10):787-95 [PMID: 15993856]
  45. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2010 Sep;36(5):233-41 [PMID: 20560821]
  46. World Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;6(1):14-8 [PMID: 17342214]
  47. Commun Integr Biol. 2011 Nov 1;4(6):637-9 [PMID: 22448301]
  48. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Jan 30;221(1):97-103 [PMID: 24239477]
  49. J Behav Addict. 2013 Dec;2(4):209-15 [PMID: 25215202]
  50. J Behav Addict. 2014 Jun;3(2):83-9 [PMID: 25215218]
  51. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004 Mar 31;116(5-6):201-4 [PMID: 15088996]
  52. J Behav Addict. 2013 Mar;2(1):17-22 [PMID: 26165767]
  53. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009 Feb;9(1):65-73 [PMID: 19162544]
  54. J Gambl Stud. 2010 Mar;26(1):53-65 [PMID: 19662519]
  55. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1993 Sep-Dec;18(3):247-91 [PMID: 8401595]
  56. Compr Psychiatry. 2011 Jul-Aug;52(4):420-4 [PMID: 21683178]
  57. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;163(10):1806-12 [PMID: 17012693]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Behavior, Addictive
Craving
Female
Humans
Internet
Middle Aged
Models, Theoretical
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0onlinepathologicalbuyingInternetshoppingspecific=addictionpotentialcravingp<studyfactorsvulnerabilitymodelexcitabilityexpectancies001parallelsuselinebehaviorcue-reactivityparadigmtendencyBuyingcorrelatedrindividualsaimedinvestigatedifferentcontextdeterminewhetherAccordingBrandcolleaguesmayconsistpredisposingmediatingvariableAdditionallymodelscue-inducedalsoconstituteimportantfactortheoreticaltestedinvestigating240femaleparticipantscomposedpicturesassessCravingmeasuredscreenedCompulsiveScaleCBSShortAddictionTestmodifieds-IATshoppingresultsdemonstratedrelationshipindividual'spartiallymediatedmodel's742Furthermoretendencies556increasecuepresentationobservedsolelyscoringhight2829801d044screeninginstruments517diagnosticconcordanceswelldivergencesindicatedapplyingproposedcut-offcriteriaidentifiedsuggestspresencepropensityemphasizesmeritsconsiderationwithinnon-substance/behavioraladdictionsPathologicalOnlineSpecificFormAddiction:Model-BasedExperimentalInvestigation

Similar Articles

Cited By