Medicinal and local food plants in the south of Alava (Basque Country, Spain).

Rocίo Alarcόn, Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana, Caroline Priestley, Ramón Morales, Michael Heinrich
Author Information
  1. Rocίo Alarcόn: Research Cluster Biodiversity and Medicines/Centre for Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University of London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.
  2. Manuel Pardo-de-Santayana: Departamento de Biología (Botánica), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Darwin, 2, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
  3. Caroline Priestley: Lucozade Ribena Suntory Ltd., 2 Longwalk Road, Stockley Park, Uxbridge UB11 1BA, UK.
  4. Ramón Morales: Real Jardín Botánico, Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014 Madrid, Spain.
  5. Michael Heinrich: Research Cluster Biodiversity and Medicines/Centre for Pharmacognosy and Phytotherapy, UCL School of Pharmacy, University of London, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London WC1N 1AX, UK.

Abstract

ETHNOBOTANICAL RELEVANCE: Medicinal and food plants in the Basque Country are an integral part of a fast changing culture. With a distinct tradition and language, this region of Europe provides an important example demonstrating the changing role of local and traditional knowledge in industrial countries. As other Mediterranean regions it preserves a rich heritage of using plants as medicine and food, offering a unique opportunity for studying the medicine food interface in an ethnopharmacological context. Therefore, the key goal of this study has been to contribute to an understanding of local and traditional plant usage, to evaluate their uses as food and medicine as well as to critically assess the role of these plants in the south of the Basque Country contributing to an understanding of how foods and medicines are used.
METHODS: A mixed methods approach, including participant observation; open and semi structured interviews was used. Ethnobotanical field work included 183 people, ages ranged from 24 to 98 years old with a majority being between 70 and 80 years old (mean age 71) from 31 towns of three different regions. The basic interview was a one-to-one meeting, which often included field walking and collection of samples as directed by the informants. 700 voucher specimens (most of them with duplicates) were collected for the data obtained. Using SPSS version 20 the gathered information was processed and the replies of the different informants were subsequently organised in variables like medicine and food plants, part of the plants used, forms of preparations, zones preferred for collecting these plants. The data were analysed based on the frequency of records. This type of approach allows us to understand the way the informant's categorize the species, and how these categories are distributed along the sample. In order to analyse the data three main categories of use were distinguished: Medicine (M), Food (F) and an intermediate Health-Food (H-F). The three categories were divided in 27 subcategories (common uses).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The informants recognise and use a total of 184 species from 49 families. During interviews, 5658 individual use-reports were collected relating to three use-categories - as medicines, food and health-food. The two main groups with almost the same number of species each are health-food (75 species) and (locally gathered) food only (73), with medicinal uses only (36) being the smallest group. This highlights the important overlap between food and medicines. Overall, three core families were identified (based on the number of use reports and in the number of species): Asteraceae (25 species), Lamiaceae and Rosaceae (24 each). The most frequently reported species are Jasonia glutinosa, Chamaemelum nobile, Prunus spinosa and Quercus ilex subsp. ballota. The most important general use-subcategories are as raw vegetables (27.43% of the use-reports and including 81 species), infusions (14.74%/42) and gastrointestinal (12.53%/42). Conceptually foods and medicines are clearly distinguished but the intermediate group of health foods is more ambiguous.
CONCLUSION: Food and medicinal uses of plants are culturally closely linked. A wide range of plants are known and many still used. The analysis shows that the Basques use a wide range of species which are typical for Western European cultures. In comparison to other studies in the Mediterranean countries there are many similarities in the uses of different families, species of plants and their use and preparations. Some of these plants are key Mediterranean species, often used for a multitude of uses as food and medicine.

Keywords

References

  1. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 Mar 30;3:15 [PMID: 17397527]
  2. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004 Apr;91(2-3):281-99 [PMID: 15120452]
  3. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013 Apr 19;146(3):659-80 [PMID: 23395624]
  4. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014 Nov 18;157:268-73 [PMID: 25304200]
  5. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009 Jun 22;123(2):213-28 [PMID: 19429365]
  6. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009 Jul 30;124(3):609-18 [PMID: 19422899]
  7. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014 Feb 27;152(1):113-34 [PMID: 24389558]
  8. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Jun 20;168:255-9 [PMID: 25862964]
  9. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Feb 23;161:116-27 [PMID: 25499311]
  10. J Ethnopharmacol. 1987 Nov;21(2):109-25 [PMID: 3325695]
  11. Ecol Food Nutr. 2009 Jul-Aug;48(4):303-26 [PMID: 21883071]
  12. J Ethnopharmacol. 2014 Dec 2;158 Pt A:216-20 [PMID: 25311273]
  13. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011 Sep 1;137(1):844-55 [PMID: 21767624]
  14. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Jul 1;169:263-8 [PMID: 25922267]
  15. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2008 Aug;59(5):383-414 [PMID: 18979618]
  16. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005 Apr 8;98(1-2):1-19 [PMID: 15763359]
  17. Vet Res Commun. 2011 Jun;35(5):283-310 [PMID: 21461643]
  18. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011 Nov 18;138(2):595-601 [PMID: 22001073]
  19. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013 Aug 13;9(1):58 [PMID: 23941692]
  20. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011 Apr 12;134(3):542-55 [PMID: 21255636]
  21. J Ethnopharmacol. 2015 Aug 22;172:347-55 [PMID: 26129939]
  22. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:156846 [PMID: 22899952]
  23. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001 Apr;75(1):19-23 [PMID: 11282438]
  24. J Ethnopharmacol. 2002 Jul;81(2):165-85 [PMID: 12065148]
  25. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Dec;47(11):1859-71 [PMID: 9877354]
  26. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011 Jan 7;133(1):138-46 [PMID: 20883764]
  27. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005 Mar;56 Suppl 1:97-114 [PMID: 15800388]
  28. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013 Jul 9;148(2):411-22 [PMID: 23612419]
  29. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 Jun 07;3:27 [PMID: 17555572]
  30. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 Apr 13;3:16 [PMID: 17433105]
  31. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004 Dec;95(2-3):373-84 [PMID: 15507363]
  32. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2008 Mar 11;4:7 [PMID: 18334029]
  33. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010 Sep 15;131(2):343-55 [PMID: 20643201]
  34. Nature. 2015 Feb 26;518(7540):487-8 [PMID: 25719661]
  35. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995 Jun;61(6 Suppl):1402S-1406S [PMID: 7754995]
  36. J Ethnopharmacol. 1991 Apr;32(1-3):25-36 [PMID: 1881164]
  37. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2005 Jun;56(4):245-72 [PMID: 16096136]
  38. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012 Jun 14;141(3):1021-40 [PMID: 22783553]
  39. Ageing Res Rev. 2008 Jul;7(3):249-74 [PMID: 17913595]
  40. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010 May 4;129(1):87-105 [PMID: 20226847]
  41. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005 Feb 10;97(1):129-43 [PMID: 15652287]
  42. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013 Sep 16;149(2):533-42 [PMID: 23892205]
  43. Appetite. 2006 Nov;47(3):333-42 [PMID: 16843569]
  44. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2002 May;53(3):225-48 [PMID: 11951586]
  45. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011 Apr 26;135(1):22-33 [PMID: 21345364]
  46. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2007 Jun 06;3:26 [PMID: 17553138]
  47. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005 Jan 15;96(3):429-44 [PMID: 15619562]
  48. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004 Aug;93(2-3):183-95 [PMID: 15234752]
  49. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010 Jul 20;130(2):369-78 [PMID: 20573568]
  50. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(17):1559-73 [PMID: 7135030]
  51. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008 Mar 5;116(2):341-57 [PMID: 18242025]
  52. J Sci Food Agric. 2013 May;93(7):1692-8 [PMID: 23152306]
  53. World Rev Nutr Diet. 2003;91:22-40 [PMID: 12747086]

Grants

  1. BBS/S/N/2006/13083/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ethnobotany
Female
Humans
Male
Medicine, Traditional
Middle Aged
Phytotherapy
Plants, Edible
Plants, Medicinal
Spain
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0plantsspeciesfoodusesmedicineusedthreeuseBasqueCountrymedicinesimportantlocalMediterraneanfoodsdifferentinformantsdatacategoriesFoodfamiliesnumberMedicinalpartchangingroletraditionalknowledgecountriesregionskeyunderstandingsouthapproachincludinginterviewsfieldincluded24yearsoldoftencollectedgatheredpreparationsbasedmainintermediate27use-reportshealth-foodmedicinalgroupwiderangemanyETHNOBOTANICALRELEVANCE:integralfastculturedistincttraditionlanguageregionEuropeprovidesexampledemonstratingindustrialpreservesrichheritageusingofferinguniqueopportunitystudyinginterfaceethnopharmacologicalcontextThereforegoalstudycontributeplantusageevaluatewellcriticallyassesscontributingMETHODS:mixedmethodsparticipantobservationopensemistructuredEthnobotanicalwork183peopleagesranged98majority7080meanage7131townsbasicinterviewone-to-onemeetingwalkingcollectionsamplesdirected700voucherspecimensduplicatesobtainedUsingSPSSversion20informationprocessedrepliessubsequentlyorganisedvariableslikeformszonespreferredcollectinganalysedfrequencyrecordstypeallowsusunderstandwayinformant'scategorizedistributedalongsampleorderanalysedistinguished:MedicineMFHealth-FoodH-FdividedsubcategoriescommonRESULTSANDDISCUSSION:recognisetotal184495658individualrelatinguse-categories-twogroupsalmost75locally7336smallesthighlightsoverlapOverallcoreidentifiedreports:Asteraceae25LamiaceaeRosaceaefrequentlyreportedJasoniaglutinosaChamaemelumnobilePrunusspinosaQuercusilexsubspballotageneraluse-subcategoriesrawvegetables43%81infusions1474%/42gastrointestinal1253%/42ConceptuallyclearlydistinguishedhealthambiguousCONCLUSION:culturallycloselylinkedknownstillanalysisshowsBasquestypicalWesternEuropeanculturescomparisonstudiessimilaritiesmultitudeAlavaSpainEthnobotanyEthnopharmacologyFood-medicinesSpanishTraditional

Similar Articles

Cited By