Quality of websites with patient information about spinal cord injury in Spanish.

M Bea-Muñoz, M Medina-Sánchez, M T Flórez-García
Author Information
  1. M Bea-Muñoz: Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Rehabilitation Service, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
  2. M Medina-Sánchez: Surgery Department, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.
  3. M T Flórez-García: Rehabilitation Unit, Foundation Hospital Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive, cross-sectional analysis of websites with information on spinal cord injury (SCI) in Spanish.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality, readability and presence of quality labels on web pages with information about SCI in Spanish.
SETTING: The Internet.
METHODS: An Internet search was conducted on Google with the keywords 'lesión medular' (spinal cord injury), 'paraplejia' (paraplegia) and 'tetraplejia' (tetraplegia). The first 50 results of each search were included. The quality of websites was assessed with the LIDA tool while the readability was assessed with the Flesch-Szigriszt index and the INFLESZ scale. We also checked the presence of any quality label.
RESULTS: After excluding duplicated and irrelevant results, 33 websites were analysed. Only four of them had a quality label. The mean score of the LIDA tool was 61.12% (medium quality), and the worst results were those referring to the reliability of the information. The readability of the web pages was somewhat difficult, with a mean of 48.22 in the Flesch-Szigriszt index. Only eight of the websites showed normal readability. We observed no differences in either the quality or the readability of the websites according to their origin or the presence of quality labels.
CONCLUSIONS: The websites analysed present a medium quality. Mainly, they should improve the reliability of their contents and their readability, including more quality labels. For SCI information in Spanish to be understandable and to provide valuable content, websites analysed in our study need to improve the quality parameters.

References

  1. Patient Educ Couns. 2002 Jul;47(3):273-5 [PMID: 12088606]
  2. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(4):404-9 [PMID: 21903014]
  3. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2015 May-Aug;38(2):255-62 [PMID: 26486531]
  4. J Consum Health Internet. 2013 Apr 1;17(2):139-150 [PMID: 24465171]
  5. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 May;54(3):189-210 [PMID: 21530443]
  6. JAMA. 2002 May 22-29;287(20):2691-700 [PMID: 12020305]
  7. Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):410-3 [PMID: 23523948]
  8. Health Info Libr J. 2006 Dec;23(4):257-65 [PMID: 17177946]
  9. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(5):545-54 [PMID: 20025150]
  10. J Rheumatol. 2009 Jan;36(1):1-3 [PMID: 19208527]
  11. Med Intensiva. 2013 Nov;37(8):503-9 [PMID: 23228699]
  12. BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):573-7 [PMID: 11884321]
  13. Aten Primaria. 2004 Jul-Aug;34(3):143-6 [PMID: 15274903]
  14. Spinal Cord. 2014 May;52(5):400-6 [PMID: 24637567]
  15. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2002 Jul-Aug;76(4):321-31 [PMID: 12216172]
  16. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010 Dec;53(10):669-92 [PMID: 21036689]
  17. J Neurotrauma. 2004 Oct;21(10):1371-83 [PMID: 15672628]
  18. Actas Urol Esp. 2003 Mar;27(3):180-4 [PMID: 12812114]
  19. Aten Primaria. 2006 Sep 30;38(5):268-74 [PMID: 17020711]
  20. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Dec;35(6):1355-62 [PMID: 22274841]
  21. Aten Primaria. 2013 Jan;45(1):46-53 [PMID: 23140836]
  22. Aten Primaria. 2010 Feb;42(2):112-4 [PMID: 19467734]
  23. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(2):114-24 [PMID: 19817663]
  24. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2826-31 [PMID: 19910867]
  25. JAMA. 2002 May 22-29;287(20):2713-5 [PMID: 12020308]
  26. Laryngoscope. 2013 Jul;123(7):1626-31 [PMID: 23720201]
  27. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Mar;14(3):e90-4 [PMID: 21883807]
  28. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2013 Sep-Dec;36(3):397-406 [PMID: 24406353]
  29. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(1):47-54 [PMID: 15156937]
  30. Aten Primaria. 2009 Oct;41(10):534-42 [PMID: 19428147]
  31. Cir Esp. 2014 Mar;92(3):201-7 [PMID: 24060163]
  32. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 Oct;64(10):869-75 [PMID: 21782311]
  33. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Apr 15;28(7):405-13 [PMID: 16507503]
  34. Int J Telemed Appl. 2012;2012:297416 [PMID: 23304133]
  35. Health Educ Behav. 2006 Jun;33(3):352-73 [PMID: 16699125]
  36. Rehabil Nurs. 1996 Mar-Apr;21(2):82-90 [PMID: 8701099]
  37. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Sep;35(5):319-29 [PMID: 23031169]
  38. BMJ. 2002 Mar 9;324(7337):569-73 [PMID: 11884320]
  39. Cir Cir. 2012 May-Jun;80(3):306; author reply 306-7 [PMID: 23415214]
  40. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2011 May-Aug;34(2):153-65 [PMID: 21904399]
  41. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2003 Jul;30(4):224-30 [PMID: 12851598]
  42. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2012 Oct;58(10):38-49 [PMID: 23037331]
  43. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Dec;82(12):957-68; quiz 969-71 [PMID: 14627933]
  44. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2008 May-Aug;31(2):135-52 [PMID: 18953362]

MeSH Term

Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Information Dissemination
Internet
Male
Reproducibility of Results
Search Engine
Spain
Spinal Cord Injuries

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0qualitywebsitesreadabilityinformationSpanishspinalcordinjurySCIpresencelabelsresultsanalysedwebpagesInternetsearchassessedLIDAtoolFlesch-SzigrisztindexlabelmeanmediumreliabilityimproveSTUDYDESIGN:Descriptivecross-sectionalanalysisOBJECTIVE:assessSETTING:METHODS:conductedGooglekeywords'lesiónmedular''paraplejia'paraplegia'tetraplejia'tetraplegiafirst50includedINFLESZscalealsocheckedRESULTS:excludingduplicatedirrelevant33fourscore6112%worstreferringsomewhatdifficult4822eightshowednormalobserveddifferenceseitheraccordingoriginCONCLUSIONS:presentMainlycontentsincludingunderstandableprovidevaluablecontentstudyneedparametersQualitypatient

Similar Articles

Cited By