Comparison of oral dydrogesterone with vaginal progesteronefor luteal support in IUI cycles: a randomized clinical trial.

Donya Khosravi, Robabeh Taheripanah, Anahita Taheripanah, Vahid Tarighat Monfared, Seyed-Mostafa Hosseini-Zijoud
Author Information
  1. Donya Khosravi: Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center (IRHRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  2. Robabeh Taheripanah: Infertility and Reproductive Health Research Center (IRHRC), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  3. Anahita Taheripanah: Department of Molecular and Cellular Sciences, Faculty of Advanced Sciences and Technology Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran-Iran.(IAUPS).
  4. Vahid Tarighat Monfared: Islamic Azad Univercity, Saveh Branch, Saveh-Iran.
  5. Seyed-Mostafa Hosseini-Zijoud: Social Development and Health Promotion Research Center, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study, we have compared the advantages of oral dydrogestrone with vaginal progesterone (cyclogest) for luteal support in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. Progesterone supplementation is the first line treatment when luteal phase deficiency (LPD) can reasonably be assumed.
OBJECTIVE: This study was conduct to compare the effect of oral dydrogestrone with vaginal Cyclogest on luteal phase support in the IUI cycles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double blind study was performed in a local infertility center from May 2013 to May 2014. It consisted of 150 infertile women younger than35years old undergoing ovarian stimulation for IUI cycles. They underwent ovarian stimulation with oral dydrogesterone (20 mg) as group A and vaginal cyclogest (400 mg) as group B in preparation for the IUI cycles. Clinical pregnancy and abortion rates, mid luteal progesterone (7daysafter IUI) and patient satisfaction were compared between two groups.
RESULTS: The mean serum progesterone levels was significantly higher in group A in comparison with group B (p=0.001). Pregnancy rates in group A was not statistically different in comparison with group B (p =0.58). Abortion rate in two groups was not statistically different (p =0.056) although rate of abortion was higher in group B in comparison with A group. Satisfaction rates were significantly higher in group A compared to group B (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: We concluded that oral dydrogestrone is effective as vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in woman undergoing IUI cycles. Moreover, the mean serum progesterone levels and satisfaction rates in dydrogestrone group were higher than cyclogest group.

Keywords

References

  1. Reprod Med Biol. 2015;14:27-32 [PMID: 25598699]
  2. Fertil Steril. 2003 Sep;80(3):654-5 [PMID: 12969719]
  3. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014 Mar;30(3):197-201 [PMID: 24397361]
  4. Hum Reprod. 2002 Feb;17(2):357-61 [PMID: 11821278]
  5. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007 Oct;23 Suppl 1:68-72 [PMID: 17943542]
  6. Hum Reprod. 2007 Jan;22(1):97-100 [PMID: 16954409]
  7. Fertil Steril. 1985 Nov;44(5):569-80 [PMID: 3902513]
  8. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Dec;97(5):416-20 [PMID: 16213136]
  9. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;47(1):57-61 [PMID: 18400583]
  10. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009 Aug;5(4):403-7 [PMID: 19753133]
  11. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014 Mar;30(3):217-20 [PMID: 24552449]
  12. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 4:4239 [PMID: 20034415]
  13. Hum Reprod. 1999 Mar;14(3):698-703 [PMID: 10221698]
  14. Hum Reprod. 2007 May;22(5):1260-3 [PMID: 17227809]
  15. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Nov;11(11):913-8 [PMID: 24639716]
  16. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(12 ):909-12 [PMID: 25102275]
  17. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Jan;31(1):89-100 [PMID: 24189966]
  18. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Dec;97(5):389-96 [PMID: 16198558]
  19. Fertil Steril. 2000 Mar;73(3):516-21 [PMID: 10689005]
  20. Fertil Steril. 1985 Nov;44(5):622-6 [PMID: 4054341]
  21. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013 Apr;11(4):309-14 [PMID: 24639761]
  22. Fertil Steril. 2012 Nov;98(5):1112-7 [PMID: 22819186]
  23. Minerva Endocrinol. 2013 Dec;38(4):401-14 [PMID: 24285108]
  24. Fertil Steril. 2013 Nov;100(5):1373-80 [PMID: 23876537]
  25. Int J Androl. 2009 Oct;32(5):498-504 [PMID: 18399982]
  26. Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Mar-Apr;6(2):139-48 [PMID: 10782572]
  27. Fertil Steril. 2011 May;95(6):1961-5 [PMID: 21333984]
  28. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008 Sep-Oct;25(9-10):453-9 [PMID: 18853245]
  29. J Reprod Med. 2014 May-Jun;59(5-6):260-6 [PMID: 24937967]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupIUIoralvaginalprogesteronelutealcyclesBdydrogestronesupportrateshigherstudycomparedcyclogestcomparisonphaserandomizedMayundergoingovarianstimulationdydrogesteronemgabortionsatisfactiontwogroupsmeanserumlevelssignificantly001statisticallydifferentp=0rateBACKGROUND:aimadvantagesintrauterineinseminationProgesteronesupplementationfirstlinetreatmentdeficiencyLPDcanreasonablyassumedOBJECTIVE:conductcompareeffectCyclogestMATERIALSANDMETHODS:prospectivedoubleblindperformedlocalinfertilitycenter20132014consisted150infertilewomenyoungerthan35yearsoldunderwent20400preparationClinicalpregnancymid7daysafterpatientRESULTS:p=0Pregnancy58Abortion056althoughSatisfactionp<0CONCLUSION:concludedeffectiveluteal-phasewomanMoreoverComparisonprogesteroneforcycles:clinicaltrialGonadalhormonesLuteal-phaseProgestins

Similar Articles

Cited By