Enrofloxacin degradation in broiler chicken manure under various laboratory conditions.

Marko Slana, Marija Sollner-Dolenc
Author Information
  1. Marko Slana: Krka, d. d., Novo mesto, Šmarješka cesta 6, 8501, Novo mesto, Slovenia.
  2. Marija Sollner-Dolenc: Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Aškerčeva 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. marija.sollner@ffa.uni-lj.si.

Abstract

The rate of degradation of enrofloxacin in broiler chicken manure has been characterized in the laboratory according to the CVMP guideline on determining the fate of veterinary medicinal products in manure. Degradation was followed in a flow-through system under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, in the dark and in the presence of light. The rate of degradation of enrofloxacin and the formation of its degradation products are dependent on laboratory conditions. A rapid degradation of enrofloxacin in the dark was noticed, where a shorter degradation half-life under aerobic (DT50 = 59.1 days), comparing to anaerobic conditions (DT50 = 88.9 days), was determined. The presence of light slowed down the enrofloxacin degradation half-life, which was significantly shorter under aerobic (DT50 = 115.0 days), comparing to anaerobic conditions (DT50 = 190.8 days). Desethylene-enrofoxacin was the only degradation product formed, its concentrations ranged from 2.5 to 14.9 %. The concentration of the degradation product was approximately 2.5-fold higher under aerobic conditions. Enrofloxacin degradation in sterile manure incubated under sterile conditions was marginal comparing to non-sterile conditions; after 120 days of incubation, approximately 80 % of enrofloxacin was still present in manure and only 1 % of desethylene-enrofloxacin was formed. The present work demonstrates that enrofloxacin degradation in chicken manure is relatively fast when incubated in the dark under aerobic conditions which is the recommended incubation system for chicken manure according to CVMP guideline.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Res. 2003 Sep;93(1):45-51 [PMID: 12865047]
  2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Nov;62(11):4206-9 [PMID: 8900012]
  3. Chemosphere. 2003 Jul;52(1):203-12 [PMID: 12729703]
  4. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2006 Jul;51(1):21-8 [PMID: 16485173]
  5. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Nov;26(3):272-7 [PMID: 21791374]
  6. J Environ Sci Health B. 2010 Jul;45(5):456-65 [PMID: 20512736]
  7. ISRN Pharmacol. 2011;2011:362459 [PMID: 22084712]
  8. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Apr;65(4):1556-63 [PMID: 10103250]
  9. J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Jun 2;52(11):3473-7 [PMID: 15161218]
  10. J Environ Qual. 2012 May-Jun;41(3):754-63 [PMID: 22565257]
  11. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Dec;37(6):611-4 [PMID: 24731224]
  12. J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Mar 12;56(5):1683-8 [PMID: 18257526]
  13. Acta Vet Hung. 2011 Mar;59(1):1-10 [PMID: 21354937]
  14. Chemosphere. 2011 Oct;85(5):892-7 [PMID: 21807396]
  15. Bioresour Technol. 2011 May;102(10):5924-31 [PMID: 21444199]
  16. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;35(1):131-41 [PMID: 23274419]
  17. Bioresour Technol. 2004 May;93(1):11-9 [PMID: 14987715]
  18. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Jun;66(6):2664-7 [PMID: 10831454]

MeSH Term

Aerobiosis
Anaerobiosis
Animals
Biodegradation, Environmental
Chickens
Enrofloxacin
Fluoroquinolones
Hot Temperature
Kinetics
Light
Manure

Chemicals

Fluoroquinolones
Manure
Enrofloxacin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0degradationconditionsmanureenrofloxacinaerobicdayschickenlaboratoryanaerobicdarkcomparingproduct%EnrofloxacinsterileincubationratebroileraccordingCVMPguidelineproductsDegradationsystempresencelightshorterhalf-life19formed2approximatelyincubatedpresentcharacterizeddeterminingfateveterinarymedicinalfollowedflow-throughformationdependentrapidnoticedDT50 = 59DT50 = 88determinedslowedsignificantlyDT50 = 1150DT50 = 1908Desethylene-enrofoxacinconcentrationsranged514concentration5-foldhighermarginalnon-sterile12080stilldesethylene-enrofloxacinworkdemonstratesrelativelyfastrecommendedvariousAerobicDesethylene-enrofloxacinkineticsLight/darkregimeNon-sterile

Similar Articles

Cited By