High-dose cytarabine salvage therapy for recurrent primary CNS lymphoma.

Marc C Chamberlain
Author Information
  1. Marc C Chamberlain: Department of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Institute, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Avenue East, POB 19023, Mailstop: G-4940, Seattle, WA, 98109-1023, USA. chambemc@u.washington.edu.

Abstract

Treatment of recurrent primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) though not standardized most often utilizes whole brain radiotherapy, re-challenge with high-dose methotrexate, or administration of an alkylating chemotherapy. High-dose cytarabine (HD-araC) has been advocated as an active agent in PCNSL but limited information exists regarding single agent activity in the recurrent setting. A retrospective review of 14 patients (10 males, 4 females: median age 60 years) with recurrent PCNSL treated at second recurrence with single agent HD-araC. HD-araC was administered at 3gm/m(2) over a 3-h infusion every 12 h for a total of 4 doses (defined as a cycle of therapy). GM-CSF was administered at conclusion of HD-araC. Patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated every 4-weeks. Common toxicity criteria Grade 3 or 4 toxicity included thrombocytopenia (11 patients; 79%), anemia (10; 71%), fatigue (8; 57%), mucositis (8; 57%), neutropenia (8; 57%) and neutropenic fever (5; 36%). No patient discontinued therapy due to toxicity nor were there any treatment-related deaths. Best response to HD-araC was stable disease in 6 patients (43%), partial response in 5 (36%) and progressive disease in 3 (21%). Median progression free survival 3 months (range 2-5 months; 95% CI 2-4 months) and progression free survival was 0% at 6-months. Median survival after onset of HD-araC was 12 months (range 3-18+ months; 95% CI 3-15 months). Single agent HD-araC has limited activity in recurrent PCNSL and is associated with significant toxicity in this small retrospective study.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Feb 15;18(4):1146-55 [PMID: 22228634]
  2. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 1;31(25):3061-8 [PMID: 23569323]
  3. Cancer. 2012 Aug 1;118(15):3743-8 [PMID: 22179954]
  4. J Clin Oncol. 1992 Apr;10(4):635-43 [PMID: 1548527]
  5. Br J Cancer. 2007 Mar 26;96(6):864-7 [PMID: 17325700]
  6. Ann Oncol. 2014 Feb;25(2):316-22 [PMID: 24265352]
  7. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 1;23(7):1507-13 [PMID: 15735126]
  8. J Clin Oncol. 1990 Jul;8(7):1277-80 [PMID: 2358840]
  9. Br J Haematol. 2014 Aug;166(3):311-25 [PMID: 24837460]
  10. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1971 Nov-Dec;12(6):944-54 [PMID: 5289712]
  11. Neurology. 2000 Apr 25;54(8):1707-8 [PMID: 10762527]
  12. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3971-9 [PMID: 24101038]
  13. Cancer Res. 1969 Jul;29(7):1325-32 [PMID: 5799155]
  14. J Neurooncol. 2014 May;118(1):155-62 [PMID: 24584709]
  15. Blood. 2013 Oct 3;122(14):2318-30 [PMID: 23963042]
  16. Lancet. 2009 Oct 31;374(9700):1512-20 [PMID: 19767089]
  17. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 1;19(3):742-9 [PMID: 11157026]
  18. J Neurooncol. 2014 Mar;117(1):161-5 [PMID: 24481997]
  19. Ann Oncol. 2006 Jul;17(7):1141-5 [PMID: 16603598]
  20. J Clin Oncol. 1983 Sep;1(9):546-51 [PMID: 6583325]
  21. Ann Hematol. 2001;80 Suppl 3:B113-7 [PMID: 11757691]
  22. Neuro Oncol. 2010 Jul;12(7):736-44 [PMID: 20511181]
  23. Neurology. 2014 Apr 15;82(15):1370-3 [PMID: 24634458]
  24. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Nov;11(11):1036-47 [PMID: 20970380]

MeSH Term

Aged
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Central Nervous System Neoplasms
Cytarabine
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Salvage Therapy
Survival Rate

Chemicals

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
Cytarabine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HD-araCmonthsrecurrentagentPCNSLtoxicityCNSlymphomapatients4therapy3857%survivalprimarymethotrexateHigh-dosecytarabinelimitedsingleactivityretrospective10administeredevery12536%responsediseaseMedianprogressionfreerange95%CISinglehighdoseTreatmentthoughstandardizedoftenutilizeswholebrainradiotherapyre-challengehigh-doseadministrationalkylatingchemotherapyadvocatedactiveinformationexistsregardingsettingreview14malesfemales:medianage60yearstreatedsecondrecurrence3gm/m23-hinfusionhtotaldosesdefinedcycleGM-CSFconclusionPatientsclinicallyradiographicallyevaluated4-weeksCommoncriteriaGradeincludedthrombocytopenia1179%anemia71%fatiguemucositisneutropenianeutropenicfeverpatientdiscontinuedduetreatment-relateddeathsBeststable643%partialprogressive21%2-52-40%6-monthsonset3-18+3-15associatedsignificantsmallstudysalvagePrimaryRefractoryaraC

Similar Articles

Cited By