Reader-Text Interactions: How Differential Text and Question Types Influence Cognitive Skills Needed for Reading Comprehension.

Sarah H Eason, Lindsay F Goldberg, Katherine M Young, Megan C Geist, Laurie E Cutting
Author Information
  1. Sarah H Eason: Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
  2. Lindsay F Goldberg: Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
  3. Katherine M Young: Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
  4. Megan C Geist: Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
  5. Laurie E Cutting: Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.

Abstract

Current research has shown that comprehension can vary based on text and question types, and that readers' word recognition and background knowledge may account for these differences. Other reader characteristics such as semantic and syntactic awareness, inferencing, planning/organizing have also all been linked to reading comprehension, but have not been examined with regard to specific text and question types. The aim of this study was to explore the relationships between reader characteristics, text types, and question types, in children aged 10-14. We sought to compare children's performance when comprehending narrative, expository, and functional text, as well as to explore differences between children's performance on comprehension questions that assess their literal or inferential comprehension of a passage. To examine such differences, we analyzed the degree to which distinct cognitive skills (semantic and syntactic awareness, inferencing, planning/organizing) contribute to performance on varying types of texts and questions. This study found main effects of text and question types, as well as an interaction in which relations between question types varied between text types. Analyses indicated that higher order cognitive skills, including the ability to make inferences and to plan and organize information, contribute to comprehension of more complex text (e.g., expository vs. narrative) and question types (e.g., inferential vs. literal), and therefore are important components of reading for later elementary and middle school students. These findings suggest that developing these skills in early elementary school may better equip students for comprehending the texts they will encounter in higher grades.

References

  1. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Apr;49(2):278-93 [PMID: 16671844]
  2. Sci Stud Read. 2013 May 1;17(3):199-223 [PMID: 23667307]
  3. J Exp Child Psychol. 1999 Jan;72(1):1-31 [PMID: 9888984]
  4. Child Neuropsychol. 2009 May;15(3):232-46 [PMID: 18629674]
  5. Ann Dyslexia. 2009 Jun;59(1):34-54 [PMID: 19396550]
  6. Br J Educ Psychol. 2002 Dec;72(Pt 4):549-60 [PMID: 12495566]
  7. Top Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;3(2):371-98 [PMID: 25164300]
  8. Behav Res Methods. 2008 Nov;40(4):1001-15 [PMID: 19001391]
  9. Scand J Psychol. 2005 Apr;46(2):107-17 [PMID: 15762939]
  10. Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):934-47 [PMID: 12428705]
  11. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 May;36(2):193-202 [PMID: 15354684]
  12. J Learn Disabil. 2010 Sep-Oct;43(5):441-54 [PMID: 20375294]
  13. Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):163-82 [PMID: 3375398]
  14. Ann Dyslexia. 1995 Jan;45(1):1-27 [PMID: 24234186]
  15. Psychol Rev. 1994 Jul;101(3):371-95 [PMID: 7938337]
  16. Am Psychol. 1994 Apr;49(4):294-303 [PMID: 8203801]

Grants

  1. M01 RR000052/NCRR NIH HHS
  2. P50 HD052121/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. R01 HD044073/NICHD NIH HHS
  4. R01 HD067254/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0typestextquestioncomprehensiondifferencesperformanceskillsmayreadercharacteristicssemanticsyntacticawarenessinferencingplanning/organizingreadingstudyexplorechildren'scomprehendingnarrativeexpositorywellquestionsliteralinferentialcognitivecontributetextshigheregvselementaryschoolstudentsCurrentresearchshowncanvarybasedreaders'wordrecognitionbackgroundknowledgeaccountalsolinkedexaminedregardspecificaimrelationshipschildrenaged10-14soughtcomparefunctionalassesspassageexamineanalyzeddegreedistinctvaryingfoundmaineffectsinteractionrelationsvariedAnalysesindicatedorderincludingabilitymakeinferencesplanorganizeinformationcomplexthereforeimportantcomponentslatermiddlefindingssuggestdevelopingearlybetterequipwillencountergradesReader-TextInteractions:DifferentialTextQuestionTypesInfluenceCognitiveSkillsNeededReadingComprehension

Similar Articles

Cited By