Narrative language competence in children and adolescents with Down syndrome.

Marie Moore Channell, Andrea S McDuffie, Lauren M Bullard, Leonard Abbeduto
Author Information
  1. Marie Moore Channell: MIND Institute, University of California, Davis Davis, CA, USA ; Department of Speech and Hearing Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Champaign, IL, USA.
  2. Andrea S McDuffie: MIND Institute, University of California, Davis Davis, CA, USA.
  3. Lauren M Bullard: MIND Institute, University of California, Davis Davis, CA, USA.
  4. Leonard Abbeduto: MIND Institute, University of California, Davis Davis, CA, USA.

Abstract

This study was designed to examine the narrative language abilities of children and adolescents with Down syndrome (DS) in comparison to same-age peers with fragile X syndrome (FXS) and younger typically developing (TD) children matched by nonverbal cognitive ability levels. Participants produced narrative retells from a wordless picture book. Narratives were analyzed at the macrostructural (i.e., their internal episodic structure) and the microstructural (i.e., rate of use of specific word categories) levels. Mean length of utterance (MLU), a microstructural metric of syntactic complexity, was used as a control variable. Participants with DS produced fewer episodic elements in their narratives (i.e., their narratives were less fully realized) than the TD participants, although MLU differences accounted for the macrostructural differences between participant groups. At the microstructural level, participants with DS displayed a lower rate of verb use than the groups with FXS and typical development, even after accounting for MLU. These findings reflect both similarities and differences between individuals with DS or FXS and contribute to our understanding of the language phenotype of DS. Implications for interventions to promote language development and academic achievement are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2000;6(2):84-95 [PMID: 10899801]
  2. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000 Oct;43(5):1146-59 [PMID: 11063236]
  3. Am J Ment Retard. 2003 May;108(3):149-60 [PMID: 12691594]
  4. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Feb;45(1):175-89 [PMID: 14748647]
  5. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Feb;48(1):172-88 [PMID: 15938064]
  6. Am J Ment Retard. 2005 Jul;110(4):312-22 [PMID: 15941367]
  7. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Dec;48(6):1363-77 [PMID: 16478377]
  8. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2006 May;15(2):177-91 [PMID: 16782689]
  9. Downs Syndr Res Pract. 2006 Jul;10(2):53-60 [PMID: 16869362]
  10. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007;13(3):247-61 [PMID: 17910087]
  11. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr;51(2):436-50 [PMID: 18367688]
  12. J Neurodev Disord. 2009 Mar;1(1):33-45 [PMID: 19865612]
  13. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010 Feb;54(2):113-34 [PMID: 19874447]
  14. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010 Oct;41(4):393-404 [PMID: 20601531]
  15. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Oct;53(5):1334-48 [PMID: 20643789]
  16. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Feb;21(1):29-46 [PMID: 22049405]
  17. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Aug;55(4):1022-38 [PMID: 22232386]
  18. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Dec;55(6):1736-49 [PMID: 22992705]
  19. J Child Lang. 2013 Jan;40(1):244-65 [PMID: 23217297]
  20. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013 Mar;118(2):77-94 [PMID: 23464607]
  21. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 May;34(4):245-51 [PMID: 23669871]
  22. Scand J Psychol. 2013 Oct;54(5):376-85 [PMID: 23855443]
  23. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Sep;34(7):508-22 [PMID: 24042082]
  24. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Dec;34(12):4455-65 [PMID: 24112996]
  25. J Neurodev Disord. 2015;7(1):5 [PMID: 25657824]
  26. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2003 Oct 1;34(4):343-357 [PMID: 27764462]
  27. Am J Ment Defic. 1983 May;87(6):601-5 [PMID: 6223525]
  28. Ment Retard. 1995 Oct;33(5):279-88 [PMID: 7476250]
  29. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Aug;41(4):861-73 [PMID: 9712133]
  30. Am J Ment Retard. 1998 Nov;103(3):288-304 [PMID: 9833659]

Grants

  1. R01 HD024356/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. U54 HD079125/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0languageDSsyndromenarrativechildrenFXSiemicrostructuralMLUdifferencesdevelopmentadolescentsTDlevelsParticipantsproducedmacrostructuralepisodicrateusenarrativesparticipantsgroupsstudydesignedexamineabilitiescomparisonsame-agepeersfragileXyoungertypicallydevelopingmatchednonverbalcognitiveabilityretellswordlesspicturebookNarrativesanalyzedinternalstructurespecificwordcategoriesMeanlengthutterancemetricsyntacticcomplexityusedcontrolvariablefewerelementslessfullyrealizedalthoughaccountedparticipantleveldisplayedlowerverbtypicalevenaccountingfindingsreflectsimilaritiesindividualscontributeunderstandingphenotypeImplicationsinterventionspromoteacademicachievementdiscussedNarrativecompetenceDownintellectualdisabilityneurodevelopmentaldisorders

Similar Articles

Cited By