Faculty perceptions of simulation programs in healthcare education.

Ana P Quilici, Angélica M Bicudo, Renan Gianotto-Oliveira, Sergio Timerman, Francisco Gutierrez, Karen C Abrão
Author Information
  1. Ana P Quilici: School of Medicine - Anhembi Morumbi University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  2. Angélica M Bicudo: Pediatric Department, Medical Science College, UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil.
  3. Renan Gianotto-Oliveira: School of Medicine - Anhembi Morumbi University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  4. Sergio Timerman: School of Medicine - Anhembi Morumbi University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  5. Francisco Gutierrez: Medicine and Health Sciences, Laureate Education, Baltimore, USA.
  6. Karen C Abrão: School of Medicine - Anhembi Morumbi University, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify faculty perceptions of simulation insertion in the undergraduate program, considering the advantages and challenges posed by this resource.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with intentional sampling according to pre-defined criteria, following a semi-structured outline regarding data saturation. We have interviewed 14 healthcare instructors from a teaching institution that employs simulation in its syllabi.
RESULTS: The majority of the faculty interviewed considered the use of scenario, followed by debriefing, as an excellent teaching tool. However, the faculty also noted a number of difficulties, such as the workload necessary to assemble the scenario, the correlation between scenario goals and the competences of the program, the time spent with the simulation, and the ratio of students to faculty members.
CONCLUSIONS: Faculties consider simulation an effective tool in the healthcare program and maintain that the main obstacle faced by them is the logistical demand.

Keywords

References

  1. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012 Fall;32(4):243-54 [PMID: 23280527]
  2. Simul Healthc. 2011 Aug;6 Suppl:S52-7 [PMID: 21817862]
  3. West J Med. 2000 Jun;172(6):393-6 [PMID: 10854390]
  4. Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28 [PMID: 16147767]
  5. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i11-8 [PMID: 15465949]
  6. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2010 Fall;30(4):208-20 [PMID: 21171026]
  7. Med Educ. 2006 Mar;40(3):254-62 [PMID: 16483328]
  8. Med Teach. 2013 Oct;35(10):e1511-30 [PMID: 23941678]
  9. Med Teach. 2013 Aug;35(8):e1380-95 [PMID: 23121247]
  10. Med Teach. 2007 Feb;29(1):33-7 [PMID: 17538831]
  11. J Nurs Educ. 2005 Jan;44(1):31-4 [PMID: 15673172]
  12. Med Teach. 2002 May;24(3):289-93 [PMID: 12098416]
  13. Acad Med. 2004 Mar;79(3):219-28 [PMID: 14985194]
  14. Contemp Nurse. 2002 Feb;12(1):58-63 [PMID: 12013519]

MeSH Term

Adult
Attitude
Education, Medical
Education, Nursing
Faculty
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Simulation Training

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0simulationfacultyprogramhealthcarescenarioperceptionsinterviewedteachingtooleducationOBJECTIVE:identifyinsertionundergraduateconsideringadvantageschallengesposedresourceMETHODS:conductedqualitativestudyintentionalsamplingaccordingpre-definedcriteriafollowingsemi-structuredoutlineregardingdatasaturation14instructorsinstitutionemployssyllabiRESULTS:majorityconsideredusefolloweddebriefingexcellentHoweveralsonotednumberdifficultiesworkloadnecessaryassemblecorrelationgoalscompetencestimespentratiostudentsmembersCONCLUSIONS:FacultiesconsidereffectivemaintainmainobstaclefacedlogisticaldemandFacultyprogramsUndergraduatecommunicationskillsenvironmentrolesteacher

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)