Shenmai injection as an adjuvant treatment for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Liwei Shi, Yanming Xie, Xing Liao, Yan Chai, Yanhua Luo
Author Information
  1. Liwei Shi: Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. 504176620@qq.com.
  2. Yanming Xie: Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. ktzu2014@163.com.
  3. Xing Liao: Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. okfrom2008@hotmail.com.
  4. Yan Chai: Department of Epidemiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. chaiyanhi@hotmail.com.
  5. Yanhua Luo: Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. 1140714457@qq.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shenmai injection (SM), as a traditional Chinese medicine injection, is widely used for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure in mainland China. It is essential to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of SM as an adjuvant treatment for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure.
METHODS: Eight English and Chinese electronic databases were searched, from inception to December 2014, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SM for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.2.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven RCTs with 2045 participants were identified. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally low. Only one trial reported data on death. None of the included trials reported quality of life. The meta-analysis indicated that compared to conventional treatment, the combination of SM and conventional treatment was more effective in terms of the New York Heart Association classification (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.20-1.32; P < 0.00001), Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (MD, 11.33; 95% CI, 8.59-14.07; p < 0.00001), partial pressure of oxygen (MD, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64-1.36; P < 0.00001) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (MD, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.58-1.08; p < 0.00001). In addition, two trials reported that SM plus conventional treatment was superior to the conventional treatment alone to reduce B-type natriuretic peptide. No serious adverse drug events or reactions were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: SM plus conventional treatment appeared to be effective and relatively safe for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure. However, due to the generally low methodological quality and small sample size, this review didn't find evidence to support routine use of SM as an adjuvant treatment for chronic cor pulmonale heart failure.

References

  1. Control Clin Trials. 1998 Apr;19(2):159-66 [PMID: 9551280]
  2. Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30 [PMID: 21603045]
  3. Heart. 2003 Feb;89(2):225-30 [PMID: 12527688]
  4. J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Apr;30(4):442-9 [PMID: 25829812]
  5. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007;2(3):273-82 [PMID: 18229565]
  6. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012 Apr 10;140(3):634-42 [PMID: 22322251]
  7. Open Med. 2010;4(1):e60-8 [PMID: 21686296]
  8. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Apr;163(5):1256-76 [PMID: 11316667]
  9. J Altern Complement Med. 2011 Jul;17(7):579-87 [PMID: 21711201]

MeSH Term

Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Drug Combinations
Drugs, Chinese Herbal
Humans
Pulmonary Heart Disease
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Treatment Outcome

Chemicals

Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic
Drug Combinations
Drugs, Chinese Herbal
fructus schizandrae, radix ginseng, radix ophiopogonis drug combination

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentSMchroniccorpulmonaleheartfailureconventionaltrialsqualityreportedCI00001injectionadjuvantmethodological195%MD0ShenmaiChineseusedrandomizedcontrolledRCTsstudiesincludedgenerallylowmeta-analysiseffectiveP < 0p < 0partialpressureplusreviewBACKGROUND:traditionalmedicinewidelymainlandChinaessentialsystematicallyassessefficacysafetyMETHODS:EightEnglishelectronicdatabasessearchedinceptionDecember2014identifyCochraneRiskBiastoolevaluateeligibleMeta-analysisperformedReviewManager52RESULTS:Twenty-seven2045participantsidentifiedonetrialdatadeathNonelifeindicatedcomparedcombinationtermsNewYorkHeartAssociationclassificationRR2620-132LeftVentricularEjectionFraction1133859-1407oxygen0064-136carbondioxide8395%58-108additiontwosuperioralonereduceB-typenatriureticpeptideseriousadversedrugeventsreactionsCONCLUSIONS:appearedrelativelysafeHoweverduesmallsamplesizefindevidencesupportroutineusefailure:systematic

Similar Articles

Cited By (29)