Comparison of fish and macroinvertebrates as bioindicators of Neotropical streams.

Renata Ruaro, Éder André Gubiani, Almir Manoel Cunico, Yara Moretto, Pitágoras Augusto Piana
Author Information
  1. Renata Ruaro: Graduate Program in Conservation and Management of Natural Resources, Western Paraná State University, Rua Universitária, Bairro Universitário, 2069, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil. renataruaro_@hotmail.com.
  2. Éder André Gubiani: Graduate Program in Conservation and Management of Natural Resources, Western Paraná State University, Rua Universitária, Bairro Universitário, 2069, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil.
  3. Almir Manoel Cunico: Laboratory of Ecology, Fisheries and Ichthyology, Federal University of Parana, Rua Pioneiro, 2153, Palotina, Paraná, Brazil.
  4. Yara Moretto: Laboratory of Ecology, Fisheries and Ichthyology, Federal University of Parana, Rua Pioneiro, 2153, Palotina, Paraná, Brazil.
  5. Pitágoras Augusto Piana: Graduate Program in Conservation and Management of Natural Resources, Western Paraná State University, Rua Universitária, Bairro Universitário, 2069, Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil.

Abstract

The biomonitoring of aquatic ecosystems in developing countries faces several limitations, especially related to gathering resources. The present study aimed at comparing the responses of fish and benthic macroinvertebrates to environmental change, to identify which group best indicates the differences between reference and impacted streams in southern Brazil. We determined reference and impacted sites based on physical and chemical variables of the water. For the analysis and comparison of biological responses, we calculated 22 metrics and submitted them to a discriminant analysis. We selected from this analysis only six metrics, which showed that the two studied assemblages respond differently to environmental change. A larger number of metrics were selected for macroinvertebrates than for fish in the separate analysis. The metrics selected for macroinvertebrates in the pooled analysis (i.e., fish and macroinvertebrates together) were different from those selected in the separate analysis for macroinvertebrates alone. However, the metrics selected for fish in the pooled analysis were the same selected in the separate analysis for fish alone. The macroinvertebrate assemblage was more effective for distinguishing reference from impacted sites. We suggest the use of macroinvertebrates as bioindicators of Neotropical streams, especially in situations in which time and money are short.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Manage. 2012 Jul;50(1):50-63 [PMID: 22525990]
  2. Environ Pollut. 1989;60(1-2):101-39 [PMID: 15092393]
  3. Ecol Appl. 2010 Jul;20(5):1384-401 [PMID: 20666256]
  4. Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Jan;187(1):4132 [PMID: 25487459]
  5. Braz J Biol. 2004 Nov;64(4):809-17 [PMID: 15744421]
  6. Ecol Appl. 2006 Aug;16(4):1267-76 [PMID: 16937796]
  7. Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Jun;184(6):3653-74 [PMID: 21823050]
  8. Environ Manage. 2003 Oct;32(4):516-26 [PMID: 14986900]
  9. Environ Manage. 2005 Apr;35(4):493-504 [PMID: 15902444]
  10. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Mar 1;218(5):669-96 [PMID: 11280396]
  11. Environ Manage. 2012 Jan;49(1):242-52 [PMID: 22086207]

MeSH Term

Animals
Aquatic Organisms
Brazil
Ecosystem
Environmental Monitoring
Fishes
Invertebrates
Rivers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0analysismacroinvertebratesfishselectedmetricsstreamsresponsesreferenceimpactedseparateNeotropicalespeciallyenvironmentalchangesitespooledalonebioindicatorsBiologicalbiomonitoringaquaticecosystemsdevelopingcountriesfacesseverallimitationsrelatedgatheringresourcespresentstudyaimedcomparingbenthicidentifygroupbestindicatesdifferencessouthernBrazildeterminedbasedphysicalchemicalvariableswatercomparisonbiologicalcalculated22submitteddiscriminantsixshowedtwostudiedassemblagesresponddifferentlylargernumberietogetherdifferentHowevermacroinvertebrateassemblageeffectivedistinguishingsuggestusesituationstimemoneyshortComparisonmonitoringHabitatquality

Similar Articles

Cited By