Changes in the Healthy Beverage Index in Response to an Intervention Targeting a Reduction in Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption as Compared to an Intervention Targeting Improvements in Physical Activity: Results from the Talking Health Trial.

Valisa E Hedrick, Brenda M Davy, Emily A Myers, Wen You, Jamie M Zoellner
Author Information
  1. Valisa E Hedrick: Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. vhedrick@vt.edu.
  2. Brenda M Davy: Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. bdavy@vt.edu.
  3. Emily A Myers: Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. eamyers@vt.edu.
  4. Wen You: Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 250 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. wenyou@vt.edu.
  5. Jamie M Zoellner: Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. zoellner@vt.edu.

Abstract

The recently developed Healthy Beverage Index (HBI) was designed to evaluate overall beverage intake quality (including total fluid consumption and beverage calories), yet no known intervention studies have assessed longitudinal changes to the HBI. The objective of this investigation was to assess changes in HBI scores in response to a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) reduction trial as compared to a physical activity comparison group. Participants were enrolled into a six-month, community-based, controlled behavioral trial and randomized into either a SSB reduction group (SIPsmartER) or a physical activity group (MoveMore). Correlations and multilevel mixed-effects linear regression with intention-to-treat analyses are presented. Total HBI score significantly increased for SIPsmartER (n = 149) (mean increase = 7.5 points (5.4, 9.7), p ≤ 0.001) and MoveMore (n = 143) (mean increase = 3.4 points (1.6, 5.2), p ≤ 0.001) participants, with a significant between group effect (p ≤ 0.05), over the six-month intervention. Other significant changes in HBI components for SIPsmartER included increased SSB and total beverage calorie scores, and decreased low-fat milk and diet soda scores. Changes in total HBI scores were significantly correlated with changes in total Healthy Eating Index-2010 scores (r = 0.15, p ≤ 0.01). Our findings suggest that individual HBI component scores, beyond the SSB component, are influenced by intervention strategies that primarily focus on SSB reduction.

Keywords

References

  1. BMJ. 2015 Jul 21;351:h3576 [PMID: 26199070]
  2. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jun;112(6):840-9 [PMID: 22709811]
  3. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6 [PMID: 4053261]
  4. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013 Oct 22;2(2):e40 [PMID: 24148226]
  5. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Apr 11;10:E51 [PMID: 23578399]
  6. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Aug;110(8):1227-32 [PMID: 20656099]
  7. J Nutr. 2006 Nov;136(11):2901-7 [PMID: 17056820]
  8. Nutr Rev. 2010 Sep;68(9):505-21 [PMID: 20796216]
  9. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Jul;113(7):957-971.e1 [PMID: 23706352]
  10. Obes Rev. 2013 Aug;14(8):606-19 [PMID: 23763695]
  11. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Oct;115(10):1682-9.e2 [PMID: 26184445]
  12. Diabetologia. 2015 Jul;58(7):1474-83 [PMID: 25944371]
  13. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Mar;95(3):555-63 [PMID: 22301929]
  14. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):516-24 [PMID: 24493081]
  15. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Mar 22;13:38 [PMID: 27000402]
  16. Circulation. 2010 Mar 23;121(11):1356-64 [PMID: 20308626]
  17. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Apr;113(4):569-80 [PMID: 23415502]
  18. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jan;37(1):43-57 [PMID: 24246819]
  19. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jul;98(1):180-8 [PMID: 23676424]
  20. Nutr Rev. 2010 Aug;68(8):439-58 [PMID: 20646222]
  21. Eat Behav. 2013 Jan;14(1):90-4 [PMID: 23265410]
  22. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Aug;98(2):261-3 [PMID: 23803892]
  23. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;105(4):824-833 [PMID: 28251935]
  24. Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11):1011-20 [PMID: 19704096]
  25. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;83(3):529-42 [PMID: 16522898]
  26. Eat Behav. 2014 Aug;15(3):379-82 [PMID: 25064285]

Grants

  1. R01 CA154364/NCI NIH HHS
  2. 1R01CA154364-01A1/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Animals
Beverages
Body Mass Index
Energy Intake
Feeding Behavior
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Middle Aged
Milk
Motor Activity
Nutrition Surveys
Nutritive Sweeteners
Young Adult

Chemicals

Nutritive Sweeteners

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HBIbeveragescoresHealthySSB=0BeverageIndextotalchangesgrouppqualityinterventionreductionSIPsmartER5consumptionsugar-sweetenedtrialphysicalactivitysix-monthMoveMoresignificantlyincreasednmeanincrease7points4001significantChangesEatingcomponentInterventionTargetingrecentlydevelopeddesignedevaluateoverallintakeincludingfluidcaloriesyetknownstudiesassessedlongitudinalobjectiveinvestigationassessresponsecomparedcomparisonParticipantsenrolledcommunity-basedcontrolledbehavioralrandomizedeitherCorrelationsmultilevelmixed-effectslinearregressionintention-to-treatanalysespresentedTotalscore14991433162participantseffect05componentsincludedcaloriedecreasedlow-fatmilkdietsodacorrelatedIndex-2010r1501findingssuggestindividualbeyondinfluencedstrategiesprimarilyfocusResponseReductionSugar-SweetenedConsumptionComparedImprovementsPhysicalActivity:ResultsTalkingHealthTrialdietarybeverages

Similar Articles

Cited By (19)