Determination of lytic enzyme activities of indigenous Trichoderma isolates from Pakistan.

Saeed Ahmad Asad, Ayesha Tabassum, Abdul Hameed, Fayyaz Ul Hassan, Aftab Afzal, Sabaz Ali Khan, Rafiq Ahmed, Muhammad Shahzad
Author Information
  1. Saeed Ahmad Asad: Centre for Climate Research and Development, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  2. Ayesha Tabassum: Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  3. Abdul Hameed: Department of Microbiology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  4. Fayyaz Ul Hassan: Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  5. Aftab Afzal: Department of Botany, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.
  6. Sabaz Ali Khan: Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
  7. Rafiq Ahmed: Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University, Abbottabad, Pakistan.
  8. Muhammad Shahzad: Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University, Abbottabad, Pakistan.

Abstract

This study investigated lytic enzyme activities in three indigenous Trichoderma strains namely, Trichoderma asperellum, Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma sp. Native Trichoderma strains and a virulent strain of Rhizoctonia solani isolated from infected bean plants were also included in the study. Enzyme activities were determined by measuring sugar reduction by dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method using suitable substrates. The antagonists were cultured in minimal salt medium with the following modifications: medium A (1 g of glucose), medium B (0.5 g of glucose + 0.5 g of deactivated R. solani mycelia), medium C (1.0 g of deactivated respective antagonist mycelium) and medium D (1 g of deactivated R. solani mycelia). T asperellum showed presence of higher amounts of chitinases, β-1, 3-glucanases and xylanases in extracellular protein extracts from medium D as compared to medium A. While, the higher activities of glucosidases and endoglucanses were shown in medium D extracts by T. harzianum. β-glucosidase activities were lower compared with other enzymes; however, activities of the extracts of medium D were significantly different. T. asperellum exhibited maximum inhibition (97.7%). On the other hand, Trichoderma sp. did not show any effect on mycelia growth of R. solani on crude extract.

References

  1. Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54 [PMID: 942051]
  2. Curr Genet. 1999 Feb;35(1):41-50 [PMID: 10022948]
  3. Adv Genet. 2013;81:33-82 [PMID: 23419716]
  4. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 18;9(6):e99366 [PMID: 24941042]
  5. J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Aug 27;56(16):6914-22 [PMID: 18642836]
  6. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006 Aug;43(2):143-8 [PMID: 16869896]
  7. Plant Dis. 2003 Jan;87(1):4-10 [PMID: 30812698]
  8. Curr Genet. 2001 Jan;38(6):335-42 [PMID: 11270576]
  9. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 May;66(5):2232-4 [PMID: 10788407]
  10. Mol Microbiol. 1996 Sep;21(6):1273-81 [PMID: 8898395]
  11. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2005;50(2):103-6 [PMID: 16110912]
  12. J Biol Chem. 1996 Oct 11;271(41):25624-9 [PMID: 8810338]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 10;93(25):14868-72 [PMID: 8962147]
  14. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003 Jan 28;218(2):259-64 [PMID: 12586401]
  15. Plant Physiol. 2007 Nov;145(3):875-89 [PMID: 17885089]
  16. Gene Expr Patterns. 2014 Mar;14(2):88-95 [PMID: 24480777]
  17. Trends Biotechnol. 2003 Sep;21(9):400-7 [PMID: 12948673]
  18. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001 Jul;56(1-2):137-43 [PMID: 11499921]
  19. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002 Aug;81(1-4):549-56 [PMID: 12448750]
  20. J Bacteriol. 1995 Dec;177(23):6937-45 [PMID: 7592488]
  21. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Apr;64(4):1442-6 [PMID: 16349547]
  22. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Jan;2(1):43-56 [PMID: 15035008]
  23. Phytopathology. 2006 Feb;96(2):181-5 [PMID: 18943922]
  24. Mol Gen Genet. 1996 Jun 24;251(4):451-60 [PMID: 8709949]
  25. FEBS Lett. 1995 Nov 27;376(1-2):103-7 [PMID: 8521952]
  26. Curr Microbiol. 2002 Jun;44(6):391-5 [PMID: 12000987]
  27. Trends Biotechnol. 2002 Aug;20(8):338-43 [PMID: 12127281]
  28. Pol J Microbiol. 2014;63(1):95-103 [PMID: 25033669]
  29. Curr Genet. 2004 Mar;45(3):170-5 [PMID: 14652694]
  30. BMC Genomics. 2011 May 27;12:269 [PMID: 21619626]
  31. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Dec;67(12):5833-9 [PMID: 11722942]

MeSH Term

Chitinases
Endo-1,4-beta Xylanases
Fungal Proteins
Glycoside Hydrolases
Mycelium
Pakistan
Trichoderma

Chemicals

Fungal Proteins
Glycoside Hydrolases
Chitinases
Endo-1,4-beta Xylanases

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mediumTrichodermaactivitiesgsolaniDasperellum10deactivatedRmyceliaTextractsstudylyticenzymeindigenousstrainsharzianumspglucose5highercomparedinvestigatedthreenamelyNativevirulentstrainRhizoctoniaisolatedinfectedbeanplantsalsoincludedEnzymedeterminedmeasuringsugarreductiondinitrosalicylicacidDNSmethodusingsuitablesubstratesantagonistsculturedminimalsaltfollowingmodifications:B+Crespectiveantagonistmyceliumshowedpresenceamountschitinasesβ-13-glucanasesxylanasesextracellularproteinglucosidasesendoglucansesshownβ-glucosidaselowerenzymeshoweversignificantlydifferentexhibitedmaximuminhibition977%handshoweffectgrowthcrudeextractDeterminationisolatesPakistan

Similar Articles

Cited By