Reliability and Validity of the Commitment to Physical Activity Scale for Adolescents.

Lorraine B Robbins, Jiying Ling, Stacey M Wesolek, Anamaria S Kazanis, Kelly A Bourne, Ken Resnicow
Author Information
  1. Lorraine B Robbins: 1 Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, Michigan.
  2. Jiying Ling: 1 Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, Michigan.
  3. Stacey M Wesolek: 1 Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, Michigan.
  4. Anamaria S Kazanis: 1 Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, Michigan.
  5. Kelly A Bourne: 1 Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, Michigan.
  6. Ken Resnicow: 2 University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine psychometric properties of a Commitment to Physical Activity Scale for Adolescents (CPASA).
DESIGN: Two test-retest studies and a prospective study, approved by a university institutional review board, were conducted in midwestern U.S. urban areas.
SETTING: The first test-retest study occurred in four community centers, the second test-retest study took place in a community school, and the prospective study occurred in eight middle schools.
SUBJECTS: To measure commitment at baseline and 1 week later, 51 girls in the first test-retest study completed an original 26-item scale, and 91 in the second test-retest study completed a revised 11-item scale. In the prospective study, 503 girls completed the 11-item scale.
MEASURES: Commitment was measured via the CPASA. After completing the CPASA, girls in the prospective study wore ActiGraph GT3X-plus accelerometers that measured light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity (LMVPA) and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA).
ANALYSIS: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were estimated. Both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to cross-validate the factor structure.
RESULTS: For the 11-item CPASA, Cronbach α ranged from .81 to .82, and test-retest reliability was .88. Both EFA and CFA indicated a single factor. The scale was significantly correlated with LMVPA (r = .10) and MVPA (r = .11).
CONCLUSION: The 11-item CPASA demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity with girls.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215 [PMID: 847061]
  2. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Nov;26(11):1382-90 [PMID: 7837959]
  3. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 Mar;35(2):188-98 [PMID: 19468040]
  4. J Pediatr Psychol. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):72-88 [PMID: 19433571]
  5. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8 [PMID: 18091006]
  6. Health Educ Behav. 2010 Feb;37(1):84-96 [PMID: 20130301]
  7. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;5(1):3-18 [PMID: 19562608]
  8. BMJ. 2012 Sep 27;345:e5888 [PMID: 23044984]
  9. NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Jan;(141):1-8 [PMID: 24401547]
  10. Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;40(3):685-98 [PMID: 21245072]
  11. J Phys Act Health. 2011 Mar;8(3):420-8 [PMID: 21487142]
  12. J Prev Med Public Health. 2013 Jan;46 Suppl 1:S35-42 [PMID: 23412904]
  13. Am J Health Behav. 2009 Jul-Aug;33(4):425-34 [PMID: 19182987]
  14. Health Educ Res. 2010 Apr;25(2):257-67 [PMID: 18936269]
  15. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2013 Jun;16(6):803-7 [PMID: 23997908]
  16. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000 Jun;71(2 Suppl):S59-73 [PMID: 10925827]
  17. Am J Prev Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):110-7 [PMID: 11457630]
  18. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):645-58 [PMID: 21565658]
  19. JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14 [PMID: 24570244]
  20. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Jan;57(1):63-7 [PMID: 12490651]
  21. BMC Pediatr. 2013 Feb 01;13:19 [PMID: 23375072]
  22. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Feb;21(2):274-83 [PMID: 23532990]
  23. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2008;22(2):148-60 [PMID: 18578222]
  24. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Mar;45(3):470-4 [PMID: 23059861]
  25. J Sci Med Sport. 2013 Jan;16(1):40-4 [PMID: 22749938]
  26. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Oct;71(5):862-78 [PMID: 14516235]
  27. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Mar;34(3):173-84 [PMID: 18312804]
  28. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1360-8 [PMID: 21131873]
  29. J Clin Nurs. 2011 Oct;20(19-20):2830-6 [PMID: 21592243]
  30. Obes Res. 2004 Sep;12 Suppl:38S-45S [PMID: 15489466]
  31. J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):231-40 [PMID: 15705040]
  32. J Sports Sci. 2008 Dec;26(14):1557-65 [PMID: 18949660]

Grants

  1. R01 HL109101/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Age Factors
Child
Exercise
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Health Promotion
Humans
Male
Perception
Prospective Studies
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Self Efficacy
Socioeconomic Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studytest-retestCPASAprospectivegirlsscale11-itemfactorCommitmentcommunitycompletedactivityreliabilityanalysisPhysicalActivityScaleAdolescentsconductedfirstoccurredsecondschoolsmeasuredmoderatevigorousphysicalLMVPAMVPAEFACFAr=ResearchTargetpopulationPURPOSE:examinepsychometricpropertiesDESIGN:TwostudiesapproveduniversityinstitutionalreviewboardmidwesternUSurbanareasSETTING:fourcenterstookplaceschooleightmiddleSUBJECTS:measurecommitmentbaseline1weeklater51original26-item91revised503MEASURES:viacompletingworeActiGraphGT3X-plusaccelerometerslightANALYSIS:Internalconsistencyestimatedexploratoryconfirmatorycross-validatestructureRESULTS:Cronbachαranged818288indicatedsinglesignificantlycorrelated1011CONCLUSION:demonstratedacceptablevalidityReliabilityValidityFemaleExerciseAdolescentMotivationFactorMeasuresPreventionManuscriptformat:researchHealthfocus:fitness/physicalOutcomemeasure:cognitivebehavioralpurpose:instrumentdevelopmentSetting:localStrategy:skilldevelopment/behaviorchangeStudydesign:nonexperimentalage:youthcircumstances:education/incomelevelgeographiclocationrace-ethnicity

Similar Articles

Cited By