Assessment of fight outcome is needed to activate socially driven transcriptional changes in the zebrafish brain.

Rui F Oliveira, José M Simões, Magda C Teles, Catarina R Oliveira, Jorg D Becker, João S Lopes
Author Information
  1. Rui F Oliveira: ISPA-Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal; Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal ruiol@ispa.pt.
  2. José M Simões: ISPA-Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal; Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
  3. Magda C Teles: ISPA-Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal; Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Champalimaud Center for the Unknown, 1400-038 Lisbon, Portugal.
  4. Catarina R Oliveira: Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal;
  5. Jorg D Becker: Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal; ORCID
  6. João S Lopes: ISPA-Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisbon, Portugal; Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, 2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal;

Abstract

Group living animals must be able to express different behavior profiles depending on their social status. Therefore, the same genotype may translate into different behavioral phenotypes through socially driven differential gene expression. However, how social information is translated into a neurogenomic response and what are the specific cues in a social interaction that signal a change in social status are questions that have remained unanswered. Here, we show for the first time, to our knowledge, that the switch between status-specific neurogenomic states relies on the assessment of fight outcome rather than just on self- or opponent-only assessment of fighting ability. For this purpose, we manipulated the perception of fight outcome in male zebrafish and measured its impact on the brain transcriptome using a zebrafish whole genome gene chip. Males fought either a real opponent, and a winner and a loser were identified, or their own image on a mirror, in which case, despite expressing aggressive behavior, males did not experience either a victory or a defeat. Massive changes in the brain transcriptome were observed in real opponent fighters, with losers displaying both a higher number of differentially expressed genes and of coexpressed gene modules than winners. In contrast, mirror fighters expressed a neurogenomic state similar to that of noninteracting fish. The genes that responded to fight outcome included immediate early genes and genes involved in neuroplasticity and epigenetic modifications. These results indicate that, even in cognitively simple organisms such as zebrafish, neurogenomic responses underlying changes in social status rely on mutual assessment of fighting ability.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Biol. 2013 Oct 1;216(Pt 19):3656-66 [PMID: 23788709]
  2. Biol Lett. 2011 Oct 23;7(5):683-5 [PMID: 21508024]
  3. PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e363 [PMID: 16216088]
  4. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2014;17:45-71 [PMID: 24368617]
  5. Brain Res Bull. 2011 Apr 25;85(1-2):21-9 [PMID: 21316423]
  6. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:498 [PMID: 20846403]
  7. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 22;279(1749):4929-38 [PMID: 23097509]
  8. Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Oct 7;282(1816):20151099 [PMID: 26423839]
  9. Zebrafish. 2011 Jun;8(2):73-81 [PMID: 21612540]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 26;109(26):E1801-10 [PMID: 22691501]
  11. Front Mol Neurosci. 2010 Feb 09;3:1 [PMID: 20162032]
  12. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jul;24(7):400-7 [PMID: 19409649]
  13. Behav Brain Res. 2013 Sep 15;253:17-24 [PMID: 23850359]
  14. BMC Biol. 2007;5:54 [PMID: 18076759]
  15. J Exp Biol. 2015 Jan 1;218(Pt 1):140-9 [PMID: 25568461]
  16. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2006 Feb;81(1):33-74 [PMID: 16460581]
  17. Bioinformatics. 2003;19 Suppl 1:i292-301 [PMID: 12855472]
  18. J Neuroendocrinol. 2013 Feb;25(2):145-57 [PMID: 22958303]
  19. Science. 2008 Nov 7;322(5903):896-900 [PMID: 18988841]
  20. Cell. 2004 Feb 6;116(3):467-79 [PMID: 15016380]
  21. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 22;269(1507):2331-6 [PMID: 12495500]
  22. Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:145-64 [PMID: 22934647]
  23. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Sep 7;268(1478):1841-8 [PMID: 11522204]
  24. Genome Biol. 2004;5(10):R80 [PMID: 15461798]
  25. Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:591-615 [PMID: 22994354]
  26. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D142-7 [PMID: 24194598]
  27. PLoS One. 2009;4(12):e8182 [PMID: 19997634]
  28. Biol Lett. 2010 Dec 23;6(6):744-7 [PMID: 20462889]
  29. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e74965 [PMID: 24040368]
  30. J Comp Physiol A. 2000-2001;186(12):1107-17 [PMID: 11288823]
  31. Horm Behav. 2014 Jan;65(1):1-5 [PMID: 24172186]
  32. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18181 [PMID: 21483679]
  33. Science. 2011 Dec 23;334(6063):1669-75 [PMID: 22194569]
  34. Front Neurosci. 2008 Jul 07;2(1):47-55 [PMID: 18982106]
  35. Physiol Behav. 2010 Dec 2;101(5):576-87 [PMID: 20851709]
  36. Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Dec;27(12):679-88 [PMID: 23040461]
  37. Nature. 2008 Oct 30;455(7217):1198-204 [PMID: 18815592]
  38. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 1;108(44):18020-5 [PMID: 21960440]
  39. J Exp Biol. 2008 Sep;211(Pt 18):3041-56 [PMID: 18775941]
  40. J Comput Biol. 2005 Oct;12(8):1047-64 [PMID: 16241897]
  41. R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Aug 26;2(8):150220 [PMID: 26361550]
  42. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559 [PMID: 19114008]
  43. Nature. 2004 Nov 11;432(7014):218-22 [PMID: 15538369]
  44. Nature. 2005 Sep 8;437(7056):207-8 [PMID: 16148924]
  45. Neuroscience. 2006;137(1):37-49 [PMID: 16289586]
  46. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Jan;21(1):16-21 [PMID: 16701465]
  47. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2014;17:3-44 [PMID: 24318936]

MeSH Term

Animals
Brain
Chromosomes
Gene Expression
Promoter Regions, Genetic
Transcription, Genetic
Zebrafish

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0socialgeneneurogenomicassessmentfightoutcomezebrafishgenesstatusfightingbrainchangesdifferentbehaviorsociallydrivenexpressionabilitytranscriptomeeitherrealopponentmirrorfightersexpressedmutualGrouplivinganimalsmustableexpressprofilesdependingThereforegenotypemaytranslatebehavioralphenotypesdifferentialHoweverinformationtranslatedresponsespecificcuesinteractionsignalchangequestionsremainedunansweredshowfirsttimeknowledgeswitchstatus-specificstatesreliesratherjustself-opponent-onlypurposemanipulatedperceptionmalemeasuredimpactusingwholegenomechipMalesfoughtwinnerloseridentifiedimagecasedespiteexpressingaggressivemalesexperiencevictorydefeatMassiveobservedlosersdisplayinghighernumberdifferentiallycoexpressedmoduleswinnerscontraststatesimilarnoninteractingfishrespondedincludedimmediateearlyinvolvedneuroplasticityepigeneticmodificationsresultsindicateevencognitivelysimpleorganismsresponsesunderlyingrelyAssessmentneededactivatetranscriptionaldominancegenomics

Similar Articles

Cited By