The Stockholm CREAtinine Measurements (SCREAM) project: protocol overview and regional representativeness.

Björn Runesson, Alessandro Gasparini, Abdul Rashid Qureshi, Olof Norin, Marie Evans, Peter Barany, Björn Wettermark, Carl Gustaf Elinder, Juan Jesús Carrero
Author Information
  1. Björn Runesson: Divisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science , Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
  2. Alessandro Gasparini: Divisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science , Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
  3. Abdul Rashid Qureshi: Divisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science , Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
  4. Olof Norin: Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm County Council , Stockholm , Sweden.
  5. Marie Evans: Divisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science , Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
  6. Peter Barany: Divisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science , Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
  7. Björn Wettermark: Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Medicine, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  8. Carl Gustaf Elinder: Divisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden.
  9. Juan Jesús Carrero: Divisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We here describe the construction of the Stockholm CREAtinine Measurement (SCREAM) cohort and assess its coverage/representativeness of the Stockholm county in Sweden. SCREAM has the principal aims to estimate the burden and consequences of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and to identify inappropriate drug use (prescription of nephrotoxic, contraindicated or ill-dosed drugs).
METHODS: SCREAM is a repository of laboratory data of individuals, residing or accessing healthcare in the region of Stockholm, who underwent creatinine assessments between 2006-11. Laboratory tests were linked to administrative databases with complete information on socioeconomic status, demographic data, healthcare utilization, diagnoses, vital status and dispensed prescription medicines.
RESULTS: SCREAM identified 1 118 507 adult Stockholm citizens with available creatinine tests between 2006-11. This corresponded to 66% of the complete population in the region. Geographical coverage was uniform, ranging between 62 and 72% throughout its 26 municipalities. Population coverage was higher across older age strata (50% coverage for age range 18-44 years, >75% for 45-64 years and >90% coverage for ≥65 years). Of note, 97 and 98% of all individuals with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular disease, respectively, were captured by SCREAM. Further, 89% of all deaths registered in the period occurred in individuals with a creatinine test undertaken.
CONCLUSION: SCREAM represents the largest cohort to estimate the burden and healthcare implications of CKD in Sweden. The coverage and representativeness of the region of Stockholm was high and in accordance to both the commonness of creatinine assessment, and the medical indications for creatinine testing. The inclusion of individuals who sought medical care and had a creatinine test undertaken resulted in a slight over-representation of elderly and comorbid patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 3:iii32-8 [PMID: 23115140]
  2. Am J Nephrol. 2014;39(4):306-13 [PMID: 24732234]
  3. Crit Care. 2006 Feb;10(1):R21 [PMID: 16469126]
  4. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Mar;6(3):489-96 [PMID: 21393489]
  5. Ups J Med Sci. 2012 Aug;117(3):273-8 [PMID: 22401136]
  6. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000 Feb;15(2):212-7 [PMID: 10648667]
  7. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83 [PMID: 3558716]
  8. Scand J Public Health. 2002;30(2):81-5 [PMID: 12028856]
  9. Lancet. 2010 Jun 12;375(9731):2073-81 [PMID: 20483451]
  10. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2012 Jul;11(4):581-96 [PMID: 22616935]
  11. Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9 [PMID: 16224307]
  12. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Jun;83(6):898-903 [PMID: 18388866]
  13. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Jan;57(1):71-7 [PMID: 21087817]
  14. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jul;16(7):726-35 [PMID: 16897791]
  15. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jan;5(1):95-101 [PMID: 19965526]
  16. Postgrad Med J. 2013 May;89(1051):247-50 [PMID: 23417370]
  17. Eur Heart J. 2000 Sep;21(18):1502-13 [PMID: 10973764]
  18. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Sep;15(9):995-1002 [PMID: 23645498]
  19. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Jun;84(6):387-95 [PMID: 25765963]
  20. Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):260-72 [PMID: 23727169]
  21. J Hypertens. 2014 Feb;32(2):439-45 [PMID: 24317549]
  22. Lakartidningen. 2012 May 9-15;109(19):960-2 [PMID: 22734261]
  23. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Oct;26(10 ):2571-7 [PMID: 25711126]
  24. Kidney Int. 2009 Dec;76(11):1192-8 [PMID: 19759525]
  25. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Nov;21(11):3164-71 [PMID: 16880181]
  26. JAMA. 2001 Dec 12;286(22):2839-44 [PMID: 11735759]
  27. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Mar 1;32(5):686-93 [PMID: 11229835]
  28. Kidney Int. 2014 Aug;86(2):383-91 [PMID: 24476695]
  29. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Apr;31(4):628-35 [PMID: 26243782]
  30. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(11):659-67 [PMID: 19504049]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SCREAMcreatinineStockholmcoverageindividualsdiseasehealthcareregionyearsCREAtininecohortSwedenestimateburdenchronickidneyCKDprescriptiondata2006-11testscompletestatuspopulationagetestundertakenrepresentativenessmedicalBACKGROUND:describeconstructionMeasurementassesscoverage/representativenesscountyprincipalaimsconsequencesidentifyinappropriatedrugusenephrotoxiccontraindicatedill-doseddrugsMETHODS:repositorylaboratoryresidingaccessingunderwentassessmentsLaboratorylinkedadministrativedatabasesinformationsocioeconomicdemographicutilizationdiagnosesvitaldispensedmedicinesRESULTS:identified1118507adultcitizensavailablecorresponded66%Geographicaluniformranging6272%throughout26municipalitiesPopulationhigheracrossolderstrata50%range18-44>75%45-64>90%≥65note9798%diagnosisdiabetesmellituscardiovascularrespectivelycaptured89%deathsregisteredperiodoccurredCONCLUSION:representslargestimplicationshighaccordancecommonnessassessmentindicationstestinginclusionsoughtcareresultedslightover-representationelderlycomorbidpatientsMeasurementsproject:protocoloverviewregionalepidemiology

Similar Articles

Cited By