Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in wild birds on Danish livestock farms.

Birthe Hald, Marianne Nielsine Skov, Eva Møller Nielsen, Carsten Rahbek, Jesper Johannes Madsen, Michael Wainø, Mariann Chriél, Steen Nordentoft, Dorte Lau Baggesen, Mogens Madsen
Author Information
  1. Birthe Hald: Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Department of Poultry, Fish and Fur Animals, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. bhal@food.dtu.dk.
  2. Marianne Nielsine Skov: Department of Microbiology, Danish Veterinary Laboratory, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. Marianne.Skov@rsyd.dk.
  3. Eva Møller Nielsen: Department of Microbiology, Danish Veterinary Laboratory, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. emn@ssi.dk.
  4. Carsten Rahbek: Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1350, Copenhagen K, Denmark. crahbek@bio.ku.dk.
  5. Jesper Johannes Madsen: Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1350, Copenhagen K, Denmark. JJMadsen@snm.ku.dk.
  6. Michael Wainø: Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Department of Poultry, Fish and Fur Animals, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. michael@wainoe.dk.
  7. Mariann Chriél: The Danish Meatboard, 1609, Copenhagen V, Denmark. march@vet.dtu.dk.
  8. Steen Nordentoft: Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Department of Poultry, Fish and Fur Animals, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. snni@food.dtu.dk.
  9. Dorte Lau Baggesen: Department of Microbiology, Danish Veterinary Laboratory, 1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. dlba@food.dtu.dk.
  10. Mogens Madsen: Danish Veterinary Laboratory, Department of Poultry, Fish and Fur Animals, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark. MOGMA@dianova.dk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing the occurrence of campylobacteriosis is a food safety issue of high priority, as in recent years it has been the most commonly reported zoonosis in the EU. Livestock farms are of particular interest, since cattle, swine and poultry are common reservoirs of Campylobacter spp. The farm environment provides attractive foraging and breeding habitats for some bird species reported to carry thermophilic Campylobacter spp. We investigated the Campylobacter spp. carriage rates in 52 wild bird species present on 12 Danish farms, sampled during a winter and a summer season, in order to study the factors influencing the prevalence in wild birds according to their ecological guild. In total, 1607 individual wild bird cloacal swab samples and 386 livestock manure samples were cultured for Campylobacter spp. according to the Nordic Committee on Food Analysis method NMKL 119.
RESULTS: The highest Campylobacter spp. prevalence was seen in 110 out of 178 thrushes (61.8 %), of which the majority were Common Blackbird (Turdus merula), and in 131 out of 616 sparrows (21.3 %), a guild made up of House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) and Eurasian Tree Sparrow (Passer montanus). In general, birds feeding on a diet of animal or mixed animal and vegetable origin, foraging on the ground and vegetation in close proximity to livestock stables were more likely to carry Campylobacter spp. in both summer (P < 0.001) and winter (P < 0.001) than birds foraging further away from the farm or in the air. Age, fat score, gender, and migration range were not found to be associated with Campylobacter spp. carriage. A correlation was found between the prevalence (%) of C. jejuni in wild birds and the proportions (%) of C. jejuni in both manure on cattle farms (R(2) = 0.92) and poultry farms (R(2) = 0.54), and between the prevalence (%) of C. coli in wild birds and the proportions (%) of C. coli in manure on pig farms (R(2) = 0.62).
CONCLUSIONS: The ecological guild of wild birds influences the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. through the behavioural patterns of the birds. More specifically, wild birds eating food of animal or mixed animal and vegetable origin and foraging on the ground close to livestock were more likely to carry Campylobacter spp. than those foraging further away or hunting in the air. These findings suggest that wild birds may play a role in sustaining the epidemiology of Campylobacter spp. on farms.

References

  1. Environ Microbiol. 2005 Aug;7(8):1116-26 [PMID: 16011749]
  2. Mol Ecol. 2011 Aug;20(16):3484-90 [PMID: 21762392]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 16;107(11):5030-5 [PMID: 20194760]
  4. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Dec;68(12):5911-7 [PMID: 12450810]
  5. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;57(11):1600-6 [PMID: 24014733]
  6. Nord Vet Med. 1981 Dec;33(12):539-43 [PMID: 7335487]
  7. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 May;75(10):3007-15 [PMID: 19286781]
  8. Avian Dis. 2000 Jul-Sep;44(3):715-20 [PMID: 11007026]
  9. J Wildl Dis. 1988 Jul;24(3):467-70 [PMID: 3411703]
  10. Epidemiol Infect. 1988 Oct;101(2):259-67 [PMID: 3181310]
  11. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Mar;18(3):466-8 [PMID: 22377498]
  12. Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jan;11(1):258-67 [PMID: 18826435]
  13. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Aug;74(16):5130-8 [PMID: 18586964]
  14. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 May;76(9):3052-6 [PMID: 20208027]
  15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Feb;45(2):375-80 [PMID: 6338824]
  16. Zoonoses Public Health. 2013 Mar;60(2):125-33 [PMID: 22827634]
  17. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015 May;62(3):209-21 [PMID: 24948379]
  18. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2015 Oct;7(5):782-8 [PMID: 26109474]
  19. J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Dec;40(12):4594-602 [PMID: 12454158]
  20. Avian Dis. 2000 Oct-Dec;44(4):993-9 [PMID: 11195660]
  21. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Feb;75(3):779-83 [PMID: 19047378]
  22. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun;74(11):3583-90 [PMID: 18390684]
  23. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;96(4):834-43 [PMID: 15012823]
  24. Vet Microbiol. 2012 Jun 15;157(3-4):369-75 [PMID: 22266157]
  25. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223 [PMID: 23245608]
  26. J Appl Microbiol. 1999 Apr;86(4):695-700 [PMID: 10212414]
  27. J Vet Med Sci. 2000 Dec;62(12):1291-5 [PMID: 11193345]
  28. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 29;9(8):e104905 [PMID: 25171228]
  29. Mol Ecol. 2013 Mar;22(5):1463-72 [PMID: 23356487]
  30. J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Nov;105(5):1558-68 [PMID: 19146492]
  31. J Wildl Dis. 2011 Jul;47(3):750-4 [PMID: 21719846]
  32. EFSA J. 2018 Dec 12;16(12):e05500 [PMID: 32625785]

MeSH Term

Animal Husbandry
Animals
Animals, Wild
Bird Diseases
Campylobacter Infections
Campylobacter coli
Campylobacter jejuni
Cattle
Chickens
Denmark
Feces
Prevalence
Seasons
Sus scrofa

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Campylobactersppbirdswildfarmsforagingprevalencelivestockanimal%CbirdcarryguildmanurejejuniR2 = 0colifoodreportedcattlepoultryfarmspeciescarriageDanishwintersummeraccordingecologicalsamplesSparrowPassermixedvegetableorigingroundcloselikelyP < 0001awayairfoundproportionsBACKGROUND:ReducingoccurrencecampylobacteriosissafetyissuehighpriorityrecentyearscommonlyzoonosisEULivestockparticularinterestsinceswinecommonreservoirsenvironmentprovidesattractivebreedinghabitatsthermophilicinvestigatedrates52present12sampledseasonorderstudyfactorsinfluencingtotal1607individualcloacalswab386culturedNordicCommitteeFoodAnalysismethodNMKL119RESULTS:highestseen110178thrushes618 %majorityCommonBlackbirdTurdusmerula131616sparrows213 %madeHousedomesticusEurasianTreemontanusgeneralfeedingdietvegetationproximitystablesAgefatscoregendermigrationrangeassociatedcorrelation9254pig62CONCLUSIONS:influencesbehaviouralpatternsspecificallyeatinghuntingfindingssuggestmayplayrolesustainingepidemiology

Similar Articles

Cited By