Integrating molecular mechanisms into quantitative genetics to understand consistent individual differences in behavior.

Alison M Bell, Ned A Dochtermann
Author Information
  1. Alison M Bell: School of Integrative Biology, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, Neuroscience Program and Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation.
  2. Ned A Dochtermann: Department of Biological Sciences, Dept. 2715, North Dakota State University, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108-6050.

Abstract

It is now well appreciated that individual animals behave differently from one another and that individual differences in behaviors-personality differences-are maintained through time and across situations. Quantitative genetics has emerged as a conceptual basis for understanding the key ingredients of personality: (co)variation and plasticity. However, the results from quantitative genetic analyses are often divorced from underlying molecular or other proximate mechanisms. This disconnect has the potential to impede an integrated understanding of behavior and is a disconnect present throughout evolutionary ecology. Here we discuss some of the main conceptual connections between personality and quantitative genetics, the relationship of both with genomic tools, and areas that require integration. With its consideration of both trait variation and plasticity, the study of animal personality offers new opportunities to incorporate molecular mechanisms into both the trait partitioning and reaction norm frameworks provided by quantitative genetics.

References

  1. Genome. 2004 Oct;47(5):900-10 [PMID: 15499404]
  2. J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jan;79(1):13-26 [PMID: 20409158]
  3. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 22;279(1749):4929-38 [PMID: 23097509]
  4. Nature. 2011 Apr 21;472(7343):313-8 [PMID: 21412235]
  5. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Aug 22;272(1573):1655-62 [PMID: 16087419]
  6. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 22;275(1633):393-402 [PMID: 18055387]
  7. Genetics. 2008 Jul;179(3):1395-408 [PMID: 18562649]
  8. Genes Brain Behav. 2013 Nov;12(8):802-11 [PMID: 24034579]
  9. J Exp Biol. 2015 Jan 1;218(Pt 1):140-9 [PMID: 25568461]
  10. Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Dec;95(6):476-84 [PMID: 16189542]
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 8;106(36):15400-5 [PMID: 19706434]
  12. Genetica. 2009 Jun;136(2):295-302 [PMID: 18758968]
  13. Evolution. 2012 Jan;66(1):1-17 [PMID: 22220860]
  14. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 May;85(2):301-25 [PMID: 19961473]
  15. BMC Genomics. 2007 Aug 22;8:288 [PMID: 17714588]
  16. Brain Behav Evol. 2011;77(4):270-85 [PMID: 21677424]
  17. Evolution. 2015 Jul;69(7):1655-64 [PMID: 25973520]
  18. Theor Popul Biol. 2001 May;59(3):175-84 [PMID: 11444958]
  19. Trends Genet. 2008 Aug;24(8):408-15 [PMID: 18597885]
  20. J Anim Ecol. 2013 Jan;82(1):39-54 [PMID: 23171297]
  21. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 27;365(1560):4001-12 [PMID: 21078652]
  22. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 26;281(1781):20132310 [PMID: 24573842]
  23. Ecotoxicology. 2013 Jul;22(5):900-14 [PMID: 23564370]
  24. Genetics. 2009 Jul;182(3):889-97 [PMID: 19414563]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 5;103(27):10358-63 [PMID: 16798875]
  26. J Evol Biol. 2005 Mar;18(2):464-73 [PMID: 15715852]
  27. Oecologia. 2014 Nov;176(3):613-24 [PMID: 25234370]
  28. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;781:149-68 [PMID: 24277299]
  29. Science. 2012 Mar 9;335(6073):1225-8 [PMID: 22403390]
  30. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 16;111(50):17929-34 [PMID: 25453090]
  31. Nature. 2013 Jan 17;493(7432):402-5 [PMID: 23325221]
  32. Am J Hum Genet. 2012 Jan 13;90(1):7-24 [PMID: 22243964]
  33. Curr Biol. 2013 Oct 7;23(19):1884-8 [PMID: 24035541]
  34. Q Rev Biol. 2004 Sep;79(3):241-77 [PMID: 15529965]
  35. J Evol Biol. 2007 May;20(3):831-44 [PMID: 17465894]

Grants

  1. R01 GM082937/NIGMS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0geneticsquantitativeindividualmolecularmechanismsdifferencesconceptualunderstandingvariationplasticitydisconnectbehaviorpersonalitytraitnowwellappreciatedanimalsbehavedifferentlyoneanotherbehaviors-personalitydifferences-aremaintainedtimeacrosssituationsQuantitativeemergedbasiskeyingredientspersonality:coHoweverresultsgeneticanalysesoftendivorcedunderlyingproximatepotentialimpedeintegratedpresentthroughoutevolutionaryecologydiscussmainconnectionsrelationshipgenomictoolsareasrequireintegrationconsiderationstudyanimaloffersnewopportunitiesincorporatepartitioningreactionnormframeworksprovidedIntegratingunderstandconsistent

Similar Articles

Cited By