Incidence, Surgical Treatment, and Prognosis of Anorectal Melanoma From 1973 to 2011: A Population-Based SEER Analysis.

Haiyan Chen, Yibo Cai, Yue Liu, Jinjie He, Yeting Hu, Qian Xiao, Wangxiong Hu, Kefeng Ding
Author Information
  1. Haiyan Chen: From the Department of Surgical Oncology (HC, YC, YL, JH, YH, QX, KD),The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou ,Zhejiang, China); and Cancer Institute (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province) (HC, YC, YL, JH, YH, QX, WH, KD), The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Abstract

Anorectal melanoma (AM) is a rare type of melanoma that accounts for 0.4% to 1.6% of total malignant melanomas. The incidence of AM increases over time, and it remains highly lethal, with a 5-year survival rate of 6% to 22%. Considering the rare nature of this disease, most studies on AM comprise isolated case reports and single-center trials, which could not provide comprehensive assessment of the disease. Therefore, we conducted a population-based study by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to provide the latest and best available evidence of AM.We extracted all cases of AM registered in the SEER database from 1973 to 2011 (April 2014 release) and calculated age-adjusted incidence. Only cases with active follow-up were included to predict factors associated with prognosis. Survival outcomes were also compared among different types of surgery.We identified 640 AM cases, which consisted of 265 rectal melanoma and 375 anal melanoma. The estimated annual incidence rates of AM per 1 million population were 0.259 in males and 0.407 in females, and it increased with advanced age and over time. Tumor stage and surgical treatment were independent predictors of survival. Results implied that surgery improved the prognosis of patients with local- and regional-stage AM but could not prolong the survival of patients with distant-stage AM. Moreover, the outcome of less extensive excision was not statistically different from that of more extensive excision.This study provides an up-to-date estimation of the incidence and prognosis of AM by using SEER data. The incidence of AM continuously increases over time, despite its rarity. This disease also exhibits poor prognosis. Thus, AM must be further investigated in future studies. We also recommend surgery as the optimal treatment for local- and regional-stage AM patients but not for those with distant metastasis.

References

  1. Cancer. 2005 Mar 1;103(5):1000-7 [PMID: 15651058]
  2. Oncology (Williston Park). 2009 Mar;23(3):288-95 [PMID: 19418830]
  3. ScientificWorldJournal. 2011 Jan 18;11:147-60 [PMID: 21258758]
  4. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Sep;42(9):1203-8 [PMID: 10496563]
  5. Melanoma Res. 2009 Feb;19(1):58-60 [PMID: 19430407]
  6. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Feb;56(2):150-7 [PMID: 23303142]
  7. Br J Surg. 2004 Sep;91(9):1183-7 [PMID: 15449271]
  8. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jan;17(1):40-4 [PMID: 19774417]
  9. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 May;54(5):638-44 [PMID: 21471767]
  10. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;35(7):757-62 [PMID: 18602790]
  11. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Mar;82(3):364-80 [PMID: 17352373]
  12. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Aug;71(2):366-75 [PMID: 24815565]
  13. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2012;5(8):739-53 [PMID: 23071856]
  14. Lancet. 1997 Mar 29;349(9056):906-10 [PMID: 9093251]
  15. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb;15(2):415-23 [PMID: 17987343]
  16. Melanoma Res. 2004 Apr;14(2):147-50 [PMID: 15057046]
  17. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Aug;6(8):603-12 [PMID: 16862191]
  18. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):125-31 [PMID: 18607861]
  19. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Sep;87(3):113-7 [PMID: 25247163]
  20. Ann Oncol. 2008 Oct;19(10):1727-33 [PMID: 18515795]
  21. BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 01;14:554 [PMID: 25081186]
  22. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 May;56(5):828-34 [PMID: 17349716]
  23. Am J Surg. 2005 Apr;189(4):446-9 [PMID: 15820458]
  24. Clin Dermatol. 2009 Jan-Feb;27(1):3-9 [PMID: 19095149]
  25. Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):1012-7 [PMID: 17122627]
  26. Aust N Z J Surg. 1997 Dec;67(12):846-8 [PMID: 9451338]
  27. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011 Sep;24(3):171-6 [PMID: 22942799]

MeSH Term

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anus Neoplasms
Female
Humans
Incidence
Male
Melanoma
Middle Aged
Prognosis
SEER Program
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0AMincidencemelanomaSEERprognosis0timesurvivaldiseasecasesalsosurgerypatientsAnorectalrare16%increasesstudiesprovidestudyusingResultsWe1973differenttreatmentlocal-regional-stageextensiveexcisiontypeaccounts4%totalmalignantmelanomasremainshighlylethal5-yearrate22%Consideringnaturecompriseisolatedcasereportssingle-centertrialscomprehensiveassessmentThereforeconductedpopulation-basedSurveillanceEpidemiologyEndprogramlatestbestavailableevidenceextractedregistereddatabase2011April2014releasecalculatedage-adjustedactivefollow-upincludedpredictfactorsassociatedSurvivaloutcomescomparedamongtypesidentified640consisted265rectal375analestimatedannualratespermillionpopulation259males407femalesincreasedadvancedageTumorstagesurgicalindependentpredictorsimpliedimprovedprolongdistant-stageMoreoveroutcomelessstatisticallyThisprovidesup-to-dateestimationdatacontinuouslydespiterarityexhibitspoorThusmustinvestigatedfuturerecommendoptimaldistantmetastasisIncidenceSurgicalTreatmentPrognosisMelanoma2011:Population-BasedAnalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By