Phase Error Correction in Time-Averaged 3D Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Cerebral Vasculature.

M Ethan MacDonald, Nils D Forkert, G Bruce Pike, Richard Frayne
Author Information
  1. M Ethan MacDonald: Departments of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  2. Nils D Forkert: Departments of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  3. G Bruce Pike: Departments of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
  4. Richard Frayne: Departments of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Volume flow rate (VFR) measurements based on phase contrast (PC)-magnetic resonance (MR) imaging datasets have spatially varying bias due to eddy current induced phase errors. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of phase errors in time averaged PC-MR imaging of the cerebral vasculature and explore the effects of three common correction schemes (local bias correction (LBC), local polynomial correction (LPC), and whole brain polynomial correction (WBPC)).
METHODS: Measurements of the eddy current induced phase error from a static phantom were first obtained. In thirty healthy human subjects, the methods were then assessed in background tissue to determine if local phase offsets could be removed. Finally, the techniques were used to correct VFR measurements in cerebral vessels and compared statistically.
RESULTS: In the phantom, phase error was measured to be <2.1 ml/s per pixel and the bias was reduced with the correction schemes. In background tissue, the bias was significantly reduced, by 65.6% (LBC), 58.4% (LPC) and 47.7% (WBPC) (p < 0.001 across all schemes). Correction did not lead to significantly different VFR measurements in the vessels (p = 0.997). In the vessel measurements, the three correction schemes led to flow measurement differences of -0.04 ± 0.05 ml/s, 0.09 ± 0.16 ml/s, and -0.02 ± 0.06 ml/s. Although there was an improvement in background measurements with correction, there was no statistical difference between the three correction schemes (p = 0.242 in background and p = 0.738 in vessels).
CONCLUSIONS: While eddy current induced phase errors can vary between hardware and sequence configurations, our results showed that the impact is small in a typical brain PC-MR protocol and does not have a significant effect on VFR measurements in cerebral vessels.

References

  1. Radiographics. 2002 May-Jun;22(3):651-71 [PMID: 12006694]
  2. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1992 Sep-Oct;2(5):605-12 [PMID: 1392256]
  3. Magn Reson Med. 2003 Oct;50(4):791-801 [PMID: 14523966]
  4. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jul;22(1):73-9 [PMID: 15971181]
  5. Eur Radiol. 2005 Oct;15(10):2172-84 [PMID: 16003509]
  6. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(4):681-5 [PMID: 17578724]
  7. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Sep;28(3):655-63 [PMID: 18777557]
  8. Magn Reson Med. 2008 Dec;60(6):1329-36 [PMID: 19025882]
  9. J Eng Math. 2009 Aug 1;64(4):367-378 [PMID: 19684874]
  10. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 Jan 14;12:5 [PMID: 20074359]
  11. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 Mar 05;12:11 [PMID: 20205725]
  12. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Mar 09;13:18 [PMID: 21388521]
  13. J Magn Reson. 2011 Sep;212(1):116-23 [PMID: 21764614]
  14. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Oct;34(4):941-6 [PMID: 21769980]
  15. Magn Reson Med. 2012 May;67(5):1294-302 [PMID: 21826731]
  16. Magn Reson Med. 2013 Feb;69(2):391-401 [PMID: 22488490]
  17. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Oct 20;14:72 [PMID: 23083397]
  18. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Feb;33(2):185-93 [PMID: 25460329]
  19. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Dec 11;16:97 [PMID: 25497004]
  20. NMR Biomed. 2015 Jul;28(7):767-91 [PMID: 26010775]
  21. Physiol Meas. 2015 Jul;36(7):1517-27 [PMID: 26020543]
  22. Radiol Case Rep. 2016 Feb 17;10(2):1109 [PMID: 27398123]
  23. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10 [PMID: 2868172]
  24. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993 May-Jun;3(3):521-30 [PMID: 8324312]
  25. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993 Mar-Apr;3(2):377-85 [PMID: 8448400]
  26. Magn Reson Med. 1998 Feb;39(2):300-8 [PMID: 9469714]
  27. Magn Reson Med. 1998 Sep;40(3):427-31 [PMID: 9727946]

Grants

  1. /Canadian Institutes of Health Research

MeSH Term

Blood Flow Velocity
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Male
Phantoms, Imaging

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0correction0phasemeasurementsschemesVFRbiasbackgroundvesselsml/speddycurrentinducederrorscerebralthreelocal=±flowimagingimpactPC-MRLBCpolynomialLPCbrainWBPCerrorphantomtissuereducedsignificantlyCorrection-0PhasePURPOSE:VolumeratebasedcontrastPC-magneticresonanceMRdatasetsspatiallyvaryingduepurposestudyassesstimeaveragedvasculatureexploreeffectscommonwholeMETHODS:MeasurementsstaticfirstobtainedthirtyhealthyhumansubjectsmethodsassesseddetermineoffsetsremovedFinallytechniquesusedcorrectcomparedstatisticallyRESULTS:measured<21perpixel656%584%477%<001acrossleaddifferent997vesselledmeasurementdifferences040509160206Althoughimprovementstatisticaldifference242738CONCLUSIONS:canvaryhardwaresequenceconfigurationsresultsshowedsmalltypicalprotocolsignificanteffectErrorTime-Averaged3DContrastMagneticResonanceImagingCerebralVasculature

Similar Articles

Cited By