Postoperative socket irrigation with drinking tap water reduces the risk of inflammatory complications following surgical removal of third molars: a multicenter randomized trial.

H Ghaeminia, Th J M Hoppenreijs, T Xi, J P Fennis, T J Maal, S J Bergé, G J Meijer
Author Information
  1. H Ghaeminia: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. hossein.ghaeminia@radboudumc.nl.
  2. Th J M Hoppenreijs: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
  3. T Xi: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  4. J P Fennis: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
  5. T J Maal: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  6. S J Bergé: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  7. G J Meijer: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative irrigation of the socket with drinking tap water on inflammatory complications following lower third molar removal.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicenter randomized controlled trial was carried out from June 2013 to June 2014. In one arm of the study, patients were instructed to irrigate the tooth socket and surgical site with a Monoject® Curved 412 Tip Syringe (Tyco/healthcare-Kendall, Mansfield, MA, USA) with tap water. In a second arm of the study, the standard postoperative instructions did not include irrigation instructions. The incidences of alveolar osteitis and wound infection were recorded for each group and analyzed by the Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: A total of 280 patients with 333 mandibular third molars were analyzed. According to the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, inflammatory complications occurred in 18 cases in the Monoject® group (11.4 %) compared to 34 cases (19.1 %) in the control group (p = 0.04). These complications were associated with significant worse outcomes regarding quality of life, pain, and trismus and caused significantly more missed days of work or study. Female gender, age >26, bone removal, deep impacted third molars, less experienced surgeons, and a high amount of debris at the surgical site were also identified as risk factors for developing inflammatory complications following lower third molar removal.
CONCLUSION: Irrigation of the surgical site with drinking tap water using a curved syringe following removal of third molars is effective in reducing the risk of inflammatory complications.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Water is a very accessible, cost-effective irrigant without side effects and the results from this study have proven that it can be used to reduce the risk of inflammatory complications and associated morbidity following lower third molar removal.

Keywords

References

  1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD003811 [PMID: 23152221]
  2. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 May;67(5):1026-31 [PMID: 19375013]
  3. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991 Sep;49(9):932-7 [PMID: 1886022]
  4. Int J Dent. 2010;2010:249073 [PMID: 20652078]
  5. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;65(9):1685-92 [PMID: 17719384]
  6. Evid Based Dent. 2009;10(2):54-5 [PMID: 19561584]
  7. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 Sep;94(3):301-4 [PMID: 12324782]
  8. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983 Nov;41(11):706-10 [PMID: 6579255]
  9. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Apr;85(4):381-7 [PMID: 9574945]
  10. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977 Jul;44(1):14-20 [PMID: 267872]
  11. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jul;67(7):1467-72 [PMID: 19531419]
  12. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29;(7):CD004345 [PMID: 25069437]
  13. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Apr;50(3):256-8 [PMID: 21636189]
  14. Acta Odontol Scand. 1972 Mar;30(1):23-32 [PMID: 4504434]
  15. Br Dent J. 2013 May;214(10):485 [PMID: 23703163]
  16. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Feb 10;9:257-63 [PMID: 25709411]
  17. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992 Apr;73(4):393-7 [PMID: 1574298]
  18. Int J Oral Surg. 1979 Dec;8(6):430-4 [PMID: 120340]
  19. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 May;69(5):1272-7 [PMID: 21256646]
  20. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jun;69(6):e5-14 [PMID: 21470751]
  21. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD003879 [PMID: 22696337]
  22. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Jun;31(3):309-17 [PMID: 12190139]
  23. Br Dent J. 2012 Dec;213(12):597-601 [PMID: 23257808]
  24. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jun;68(6):1322-6 [PMID: 20346565]
  25. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jun;69(6):e24-30 [PMID: 21497001]
  26. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD003861 [PMID: 22336796]
  27. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;43(10):2158-67 [PMID: 26596360]
  28. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2003 May;15(2):177-86 [PMID: 18088673]
  29. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Aug;41(8):1020-4 [PMID: 22424708]
  30. Acta Odontol Scand. 1970 Dec;28(6):773-83 [PMID: 5277407]
  31. J Oral Surg. 1979 Oct;37(10):732-5 [PMID: 289736]
  32. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jan;107(1):30-5 [PMID: 18755610]
  33. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;65(10):1909-21 [PMID: 17884515]
  34. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 10;8(9):e73897 [PMID: 24040109]
  35. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;43(5):649-53 [PMID: 24314857]
  36. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986 Nov;44(11):855-9 [PMID: 3464711]
  37. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995 Apr;79(4):416-22 [PMID: 7614198]
  38. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Dec;114(6):e5-12 [PMID: 23159124]
  39. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;65(9):1700-6 [PMID: 17719386]
  40. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Jan 01;20(1):e117-22 [PMID: 25475772]
  41. Int J Oral Surg. 1979 Dec;8(6):421-9 [PMID: 120339]
  42. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):e33-8 [PMID: 22890087]
  43. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12:CD006968 [PMID: 23235637]
  44. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Nov;66(11):2213-8 [PMID: 18940482]
  45. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969 May 1;104(1):2-12 [PMID: 5777700]
  46. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1977 Mar 1;127(5):518-9 [PMID: 836651]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Drinking Water
Dry Socket
Female
Humans
Male
Mandible
Molar, Third
Pain Measurement
Postoperative Complications
Risk Factors
Surgical Wound Infection
Syringes
Therapeutic Irrigation
Tooth Socket
Tooth, Impacted
Treatment Outcome

Chemicals

Drinking Water

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0complicationsthirdinflammatoryremovalstudywaterfollowingtapsurgicalriskirrigationsocketdrinkinglowermolarsitegroupmolarspostoperativemulticenterrandomizedtrialJunearmpatientsMonoject®instructionsanalyzedcasesassociatedlifefactorsIrrigationOBJECTIVES:primaryaimpresentevaluateeffectivenessMATERIALANDMETHODS:controlledcarried20132014oneinstructedirrigatetoothCurved412TipSyringeTyco/healthcare-KendallMansfieldMAUSAsecondstandardincludeincidencesalveolarosteitiswoundinfectionrecordedFisher'sexacttestRESULTS:total280333mandibularAccordingintention-to-treatITTanalysisoccurred18114 %compared34191 %controlp = 004significantworseoutcomesregardingqualitypaintrismuscausedsignificantlymisseddaysworkFemalegenderage>26bonedeepimpactedlessexperiencedsurgeonshighamountdebrisalsoidentifieddevelopingCONCLUSION:usingcurvedsyringeeffectivereducingCLINICALRELEVANCE:Wateraccessiblecost-effectiveirrigantwithoutsideeffectsresultsprovencanusedreducemorbidityPostoperativereducesmolars:DrinkingOralhealthimpactprofilePainPreventionQualityRiskTrismus

Similar Articles

Cited By