A Quantitative Analysis of Published Skull Base Endoscopy Literature.

Douglas A Hardesty, Francisco A Ponce, Andrew S Little, Peter Nakaji
Author Information
  1. Douglas A Hardesty: Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
  2. Francisco A Ponce: Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
  3. Andrew S Little: Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
  4. Peter Nakaji: Division of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.

Abstract

Objectives Skull base endoscopy allows for minimal access approaches to the sinonasal contents and cranial base. Advances in endoscopic technique and applications have been published rapidly in recent decades. Setting We utilized an Internet-based scholarly database (Web of Science, Thomson Reuters) to query broad-based phrases regarding skull base endoscopy literature. Participants All skull base endoscopy publications. Main Outcome Measures Standard bibliometrics outcomes. Results We identified 4,082 relevant skull base endoscopy English-language articles published between 1973 and 2014. The 50 top-cited publications (n = 51, due to articles with equal citation counts) ranged in citation count from 397 to 88. Most of the articles were clinical case series or technique descriptions. Most (96% [49/51])were published in journals specific to either neurosurgery or otolaryngology. Conclusions A relatively small number of institutions and individuals have published a large amount of the literature. Most of the publications consisted of case series and technical advances, with a lack of randomized trials.

Keywords

References

  1. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2012;90(3):201-9 [PMID: 22677634]
  2. J Neurosurg. 2010 Sep;113(3):447-57 [PMID: 20380531]
  3. Laryngoscope. 2006 Oct;116(10):1882-6 [PMID: 17003708]
  4. World J Surg. 2002 Sep;26(9):1099-105 [PMID: 12209239]
  5. J Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;112(2):233-46 [PMID: 20078193]
  6. J Affect Disord. 2011 Nov;134(1-3):39-44 [PMID: 21652082]
  7. Epilepsia. 2012 May;53(5):765-70 [PMID: 22462799]
  8. Anesth Analg. 2004 Feb;98(2):443-51, table of contents [PMID: 14742385]
  9. JAMA. 1987 Jan 2;257(1):52-9 [PMID: 3537352]
  10. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986 Feb;94(2):147-56 [PMID: 3083327]
  11. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Oct;24(6):647-54 [PMID: 16984831]
  12. J Neurosurg. 2010 Feb;112(2):223-32 [PMID: 20078192]
  13. Intensive Care Med. 2004 May;30(5):902-10 [PMID: 14985952]
  14. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;247(2):63-76 [PMID: 2180446]
  15. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986 Feb;94(2):143-7 [PMID: 3083326]
  16. Mov Disord. 2011 Feb 15;26(3):380-90 [PMID: 21462255]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0baseendoscopypublishedskullpublicationsarticlescitationtechniquescholarlyliteraturecaseseriesObjectives SkullallowsminimalaccessapproachessinonasalcontentscranialAdvancesendoscopicapplicationsrapidlyrecentdecadesSetting WeutilizedInternet-baseddatabaseWebScienceThomsonReutersquerybroad-basedphrasesregardingParticipants AllMainOutcomeMeasures StandardbibliometricsoutcomesResults Weidentified4082relevantEnglish-language1973201450top-citedn = 51dueequalcountsrangedcount39788clinicaldescriptions96%[49/51]journalsspecificeitherneurosurgeryotolaryngologyConclusions ArelativelysmallnumberinstitutionsindividualslargeamountconsistedtechnicaladvanceslackrandomizedtrialsQuantitativeAnalysisPublishedSkullBaseEndoscopyLiteratureclassicendonasalsurgeryimpact

Similar Articles

Cited By