Publication speed and advanced online publication: Are biomedical Indian journals slow?

Akash Shah, Swathi Ganesh Sherighar, Anup Bhat
Author Information
  1. Akash Shah: Department of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
  2. Swathi Ganesh Sherighar: Physiotherapy Unit, Mahesh Hospital, Brahmavara, Udupi, Karnataka, India.
  3. Anup Bhat: Department of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the publication speed (peer review time and publication time) of biomedical Indian journals and identify the journals having the facility of advance online publication (AOP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biomedical Indian journals were identified from the Journal Citation Report of 2013. Thirty original articles published between January 2012 and June 2014 were systematically selected from each journal. Information about the date of submission, revision, and acceptance were extracted from the full text of the articles. Median peer review time (submission to acceptance) and publication time (acceptance to AOP/electronic publication) were calculated for each journal.
RESULTS: Of the 19 journals studied, 5 (26.3%), 15 (78.9%), and 6 (31.6%) journals did not mention details about date of submission, date of revision, and date of acceptance, respectively. The individual median peer review time of the journals ranged from 87 to 377.5 days and the combined median peer review time (interquartile range) was 143.5 days (105.5, 238). The individual median publication time ranged from 14 to 349 days. The publication time for journals with AOP was significantly lesser (29.5 [19.6, 50.6] vs. 146.5 [126.5, 202.5]; P = 0.02) compared to journals without AOP. Impact factor of the journal did not correlate with the publication speed. The facility of AOP was provided by 6 (31.6%) journals.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the peer review time and publication time of biomedical Indian journals included in our study seems to be fairly long. Less than one-third of biomedical Indian journals provide the facility of AOP.

Keywords

References

  1. Head Face Med. 2007 Jun 11;3:27 [PMID: 17562003]
  2. Singapore Med J. 2009 Mar;50(3):230-4 [PMID: 19352562]
  3. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Oct;1(10):741-8 [PMID: 17411694]
  4. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;76(6):759 [PMID: 15897491]
  5. Arch Med Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;34(5):439-43 [PMID: 14602513]
  6. Nat Struct Biol. 2002 Apr;9(4):233 [PMID: 11914725]
  7. J Thorac Dis. 2012 Jun 1;4(3):336-8 [PMID: 22754677]
  8. Ophthalmology. 2013 Aug;120(8):1697-701 [PMID: 23623355]
  9. PeerJ. 2014 Apr 22;2:e365 [PMID: 24795855]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0journalspublicationtime5peerreviewIndianAOPbiomedicaldateacceptancespeedfacilityjournalsubmission6mediandaysstudyidentifyonlinearticlesrevision316%individualrangedOBJECTIVE:aimadvanceMATERIALSANDMETHODS:BiomedicalidentifiedJournalCitationReport2013ThirtyoriginalpublishedJanuary2012June2014systematicallyselectedInformationextractedfulltextMedianAOP/electroniccalculatedRESULTS:19studied263%15789%mentiondetailsrespectively87377combinedinterquartilerange14310523814349significantlylesser29[19506]vs146[1262025]P=002comparedwithoutImpactfactorcorrelateprovidedCONCLUSIONS:OverallincludedseemsfairlylongLessone-thirdprovidePublicationadvancedpublication:slow?Medicalpublishingdelayresearch

Similar Articles

Cited By