Object-based Encoding in Visual Working Memory: Evidence from Memory-driven Attentional Capture.

Zaifeng Gao, Shixian Yu, Chengfeng Zhu, Rende Shui, Xuchu Weng, Peng Li, Mowei Shen
Author Information
  1. Zaifeng Gao: Department of Psychology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  2. Shixian Yu: Department of Psychology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  3. Chengfeng Zhu: Department of Psychology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  4. Rende Shui: Department of Psychology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
  5. Xuchu Weng: Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
  6. Peng Li: School of Education &Management, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, China.
  7. Mowei Shen: Department of Psychology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Abstract

Visual working memory (VWM) adopts a specific manner of object-based encoding (OBE) to extract perceptual information: Whenever one feature-dimension is selected for entry into VWM, the others are also extracted. Currently most studies revealing OBE probed an 'irrelevant-change distracting effect', where changes of irrelevant-features dramatically affected the performance of the target feature. However, the existence of irrelevant-feature change may affect participants' processing manner, leading to a false-positive result. The current study conducted a strict examination of OBE in VWM, by probing whether irrelevant-features guided the deployment of attention in visual search. The participants memorized an object's colour yet ignored shape and concurrently performed a visual-search task. They searched for a target line among distractor lines, each embedded within a different object. One object in the search display could match the shape, colour, or both dimensions of the memory item, but this object never contained the target line. Relative to a neutral baseline, where there was no match between the memory and search displays, search time was significantly prolonged in all match conditions, regardless of whether the memory item was displayed for 100 or 1000 ms. These results suggest that task-irrelevant shape was extracted into VWM, supporting OBE in VWM.

References

  1. Biol Psychol. 2012 Apr;90(1):71-9 [PMID: 22410263]
  2. Mem Cognit. 2011 Jan;39(1):24-36 [PMID: 21264632]
  3. Psychol Sci. 2015 Feb;26(2):203-10 [PMID: 25564523]
  4. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):217-25 [PMID: 20643386]
  5. Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6 [PMID: 9176952]
  6. Exp Psychol. 2009;56(3):165-72 [PMID: 19289358]
  7. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):218-34 [PMID: 22642710]
  8. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):218-24 [PMID: 22215468]
  9. J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 20;30(42):14020-8 [PMID: 20962223]
  10. Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):223-9 [PMID: 18605507]
  11. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Sep;12(9):342-8 [PMID: 18693131]
  12. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Dec;37(6):1803-23 [PMID: 22004193]
  13. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jun;62(6):1123-31 [PMID: 19142832]
  14. Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Jul;30(2):307-17 [PMID: 19691812]
  15. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 May;26(3):683-702 [PMID: 10855426]
  16. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23873 [PMID: 21957441]
  17. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1243-65 [PMID: 17002535]
  18. Vis cogn. 2012 Jan 13;20(1):1-28 [PMID: 22287933]
  19. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Oct;75(7):1330-5 [PMID: 23918552]
  20. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Aug;35(4):1140-60 [PMID: 19653755]
  21. Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1704-19 [PMID: 17489296]
  22. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1108-27 [PMID: 20718568]
  23. Psychol Aging. 2011 Sep;26(3):612-24 [PMID: 21463062]
  24. Vision Res. 2006 Mar;46(6-7):1010-8 [PMID: 16257030]
  25. Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 1;89:289-96 [PMID: 24287439]
  26. Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:1-29 [PMID: 21961947]
  27. Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb;20(2):207-14 [PMID: 19170936]
  28. Neurosci Lett. 2010 Dec 17;486(3):202-6 [PMID: 20884328]
  29. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1292-302 [PMID: 19803637]
  30. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Dec;21(12):2809-19 [PMID: 21527784]
  31. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 Mar;4(2):179-90 [PMID: 26304194]
  32. Vis cogn. 2011 Aug;19(7):956-972 [PMID: 22053147]
  33. J Vis. 2013;13(10). pii: 11. doi: 10.1167/13.10.11 [PMID: 23962736]
  34. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Mar;17(3):347-56 [PMID: 24569831]
  35. J Vis. 2013;13(2):1 [PMID: 23378130]
  36. PLoS One. 2010;5(12):e14273 [PMID: 21170315]
  37. Neurosci Lett. 2011 Mar 10;491(1):26-30 [PMID: 21215290]
  38. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Oct;71(7):1525-33 [PMID: 19801613]
  39. Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 30;3:309 [PMID: 22969739]
  40. Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Aug;19(4):639-46 [PMID: 22528872]
  41. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Apr;33(2):363-77 [PMID: 17469973]
  42. J Vis. 2013;13(2). pii: 21. doi: 10.1167/13.2.21 [PMID: 23420420]

MeSH Term

Attention
Brain
Female
Humans
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Visual Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0VWMmemoryOBEsearchtargetshapeobjectmatchVisualmannerextractedirrelevant-featureswhethercolourlineitemworkingadoptsspecificobject-basedencodingextractperceptualinformation:Wheneveronefeature-dimensionselectedentryothersalsoCurrentlystudiesrevealingprobed'irrelevant-changedistractingeffect'changesdramaticallyaffectedperformancefeatureHoweverexistenceirrelevant-featurechangemayaffectparticipants'processingleadingfalse-positiveresultcurrentstudyconductedstrictexaminationprobingguideddeploymentattentionvisualparticipantsmemorizedobject'syetignoredconcurrentlyperformedvisual-searchtasksearchedamongdistractorlinesembeddedwithindifferentOnedisplaydimensionsnevercontainedRelativeneutralbaselinedisplaystimesignificantlyprolongedconditionsregardlessdisplayed1001000 msresultssuggesttask-irrelevantsupportingObject-basedEncodingWorkingMemory:EvidenceMemory-drivenAttentionalCapture

Similar Articles

Cited By