Olfactory Response and Host Plant Feeding of the Central American Locust Schistocerca piceifrons piceifrons Walker to Common Plants in a Gregarious Zone.

M A Poot-Pech, E Ruiz-Sánchez, H S Ballina-Gómez, M M Gamboa-Angulo, A Reyes-Ramírez
Author Information
  1. M A Poot-Pech: División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal, Km 16.3, antigua carretera Mérida-Motul, C.P. 97345, Conkal, Yucatán, México.
  2. E Ruiz-Sánchez: División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal, Km 16.3, antigua carretera Mérida-Motul, C.P. 97345, Conkal, Yucatán, México. esauruizmx@yahoo.com.mx.
  3. H S Ballina-Gómez: División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal, Km 16.3, antigua carretera Mérida-Motul, C.P. 97345, Conkal, Yucatán, México.
  4. M M Gamboa-Angulo: Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México.
  5. A Reyes-Ramírez: División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Instituto Tecnológico de Conkal, Km 16.3, antigua carretera Mérida-Motul, C.P. 97345, Conkal, Yucatán, México.

Abstract

The Central American locust (CAL) Schistocerca piceifrons piceifrons Walker is one of the most harmful plant pests in the Yucatan Peninsula, where an important gregarious zone is located. The olfactory response and host plant acceptance by the CAL have not been studied in detail thus far. In this work, the olfactory response of the CAL to odor of various plant species was evaluated using an olfactometer test system. In addition, the host plant acceptance was assessed by the consumption of leaf area. Results showed that the CAL was highly attracted to odor of Pisonia aculeata. Evaluation of host plant acceptance showed that the CAL fed on Leucaena glauca and Waltheria americana, but not on P. aculeata or Guazuma ulmifolia. Analysis of leaf thickness, and leaf content of nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) showed that the CAL was attracted to plant species with low leaf C content.

Keywords

References

  1. Anim Behav. 2000 Mar;59(3):643-652 [PMID: 10715188]
  2. Phytochemistry. 2001 Oct;58(3):429-40 [PMID: 11557075]
  3. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:203-31 [PMID: 10761576]
  4. Ecology. 2012 May;93(5):1002-15 [PMID: 22764487]
  5. New Phytol. 2005 Jul;167(1):207-18 [PMID: 15948843]
  6. Plant Physiol. 1999 Oct;121(2):325-32 [PMID: 10517823]
  7. Phytochemistry. 1996 Sep;43(1):189-94 [PMID: 8987513]
  8. Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Oct 1;7(10):1306-20 [PMID: 22895106]
  9. Science. 2009 Jan 30;323(5914):627-30 [PMID: 19179529]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 27;98(7):3895-7 [PMID: 11274411]
  11. Evolution. 1966 Sep;20(3):249-275 [PMID: 28562970]
  12. J Insect Physiol. 2000 Sep 1;46(9):1295-1301 [PMID: 10844148]
  13. J Evol Biol. 2012 Feb;25(2):244-51 [PMID: 22225990]
  14. Trends Plant Sci. 2004 May;9(5):253-61 [PMID: 15130551]
  15. J Econ Entomol. 2003 Aug;96(4):1193-200 [PMID: 14503591]
  16. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014 Feb;89(1):68-81 [PMID: 23714000]

MeSH Term

Animals
Feeding Behavior
Grasshoppers
Hymenoptera
Nitrogen
Plant Leaves
Plants
Smell
United States

Chemicals

Nitrogen

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CALplantleafpiceifronshostacceptanceshowedCentralAmericanSchistocercaWalkerolfactoryresponseodorspeciesolfactometerattractedaculeatacontentCHostlocustoneharmfulpestsYucatanPeninsulaimportantgregariouszonelocatedstudieddetailthusfarworkvariousevaluatedusingtestsystemadditionassessedconsumptionareaResultshighlyPisoniaEvaluationfedLeucaenaglaucaWaltheriaamericanaPGuazumaulmifoliaAnalysisthicknessnitrogenNcarbonlowOlfactoryResponsePlantFeedingLocustCommonPlantsGregariousZoneselectioninsect–plantinteractiontraits

Similar Articles

Cited By