Threshold dose for discrimination of nicotine via cigarette smoking.

Kenneth A Perkins, Nicole Kunkle, Joshua L Karelitz, Valerie C Michael, Eric C Donny
Author Information
  1. Kenneth A Perkins: Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. perkinska@upmc.edu.
  2. Nicole Kunkle: Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
  3. Joshua L Karelitz: Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
  4. Valerie C Michael: Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
  5. Eric C Donny: Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 210 S. Bouquet St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.

Abstract

RATIONALE: The lowest nicotine threshold "dose" in cigarettes discriminated from a cigarette containing virtually no nicotine may help inform the minimum dose maintaining dependence.
OBJECTIVES: Spectrum research cigarettes (from NIDA) differing in nicotine content were used to evaluate a procedure to determine discrimination thresholds.
METHODS: Dependent smokers (n = 18; 13 M, 5 F) were tested on ability to discriminate cigarettes with nicotine contents of 11, 5, 2.4, and 1.3 mg/g, one per session, from the "ultralow" cigarette with 0.4 mg/g, after having discriminated 16 mg/g from 0.4 mg/g (all had 9-10 mg "tar"). Exposure to each was limited to 4 puffs/trial. All subjects were abstinent from smoking overnight prior to each session, and the number of sessions was determined by the participant's success in discrimination behavior on >80 % of trials. Subjective perceptions and behavioral choice between cigarettes were also assessed and related to discrimination behavior.
RESULTS: The median threshold was 11 mg/g, but the range was 2.4 to 16 mg/g, suggesting wide variability in discrimination threshold. Compared to the ultralow, puff choice was greater for the subject's threshold dose but only marginal for the subthreshold (next lowest nicotine) cigarette. Threshold and subthreshold also differed on subjective perceptions but not withdrawal relief.
CONCLUSIONS: Under these testing conditions, threshold content for discriminating nicotine via cigarettes may be 11 mg/g or greater for most smokers, but some can discriminate nicotine contents one-half or one-quarter this amount. Further study with other procedures and cigarette exposure amounts may identify systematic differences in nicotine discrimination thresholds.

Keywords

References

  1. Br J Addict. 1991 Dec;86(12):1587-94 [PMID: 1786491]
  2. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Dec;18(12):3305-20 [PMID: 19959678]
  3. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2013 Dec;114-115:82-9 [PMID: 24201046]
  4. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1988;94(2):206-12 [PMID: 3127846]
  5. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119-27 [PMID: 1932883]
  6. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009;(192):295-333 [PMID: 19184654]
  7. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Sep;18(9):1830-6 [PMID: 27013335]
  8. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Jan;14(1):18-28 [PMID: 21324834]
  9. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002 May;4(2):149-59 [PMID: 12028847]
  10. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 May;63(3):277-94 [PMID: 7751833]
  11. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Jun 1;151:181-93 [PMID: 25891231]
  12. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996 Oct;55(2):257-63 [PMID: 8951962]
  13. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Nov;17(11):1297-310 [PMID: 25673111]
  14. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2015 Dec;232(23):4243-52 [PMID: 26345343]
  15. N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):123-5 [PMID: 7818638]
  16. NIDA Res Monogr. 1991;(116):181-96 [PMID: 1369667]
  17. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1993 Nov;46(3):527-34 [PMID: 8278429]
  18. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):274-85 [PMID: 16362402]
  19. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Mar;33(4):715-20 [PMID: 17534380]
  20. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Dec;116(4):407-13 [PMID: 7701041]
  21. JAMA. 1994 Jul 27;272(4):312-4 [PMID: 8028146]
  22. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Mar;15(3):622-32 [PMID: 22990226]
  23. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Mar;43(3):289-94 [PMID: 3954551]
  24. Tob Control. 2010 Oct;19(5):e1-10 [PMID: 20876072]
  25. Behav Pharmacol. 1998 Nov;9(7):533-43 [PMID: 9862079]
  26. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jun;15(6):1113-21 [PMID: 23178320]
  27. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Sep;175(2):134-42 [PMID: 14997277]
  28. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;97(1):131-8 [PMID: 2496419]
  29. Addict Behav. 1988;13(1):91-5 [PMID: 3364230]
  30. N Engl J Med. 1983 Jul 21;309(3):139-42 [PMID: 6866013]
  31. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Mar;22(3):382-9 [PMID: 23334588]
  32. Addict Behav. 2012 Jan;37(1):42-6 [PMID: 21862228]
  33. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Oct;61(5):743-50 [PMID: 8245272]
  34. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005 Oct;82(2):320-9 [PMID: 16213579]
  35. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2006 Dec;21(8):539-48 [PMID: 17066490]
  36. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):2539-44 [PMID: 25605923]
  37. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1340-9 [PMID: 26422724]
  38. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Feb;56(1):100-10 [PMID: 19723554]
  39. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009 Apr;12(3):305-16 [PMID: 18706128]
  40. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Jan 17;93(2):134-8 [PMID: 11208883]
  41. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1995 Jan;50(1):91-6 [PMID: 7700960]
  42. Addiction. 2007 Feb;102(2):324-34 [PMID: 17222288]
  43. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Jun;115(1-2):1-8 [PMID: 7862879]
  44. Addiction. 1994 Jun;89(6):743-54 [PMID: 8069175]
  45. Behav Brain Res. 1996 Aug;78(2):183-8 [PMID: 8864050]
  46. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 Oct;157(4):411-20 [PMID: 11605101]
  47. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Jul;11(7):896-903 [PMID: 19525207]
  48. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jun;15(6):1003-13 [PMID: 23100460]
  49. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Apr;14(4):490-4 [PMID: 22039077]
  50. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001 May;155(2):163-70 [PMID: 11401005]
  51. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Jan;14(1):7-17 [PMID: 21460383]
  52. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Sep 1;125(1-2):1-7 [PMID: 22622242]

Grants

  1. T32 HL007560/NHLBI NIH HHS
  2. U54 DA031659/NIDA NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Choice Behavior
Discrimination Learning
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Female
Humans
Male
Nicotine
Smoking
Tobacco Products
Young Adult

Chemicals

Nicotine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nicotinediscriminationthresholdcigarettescigarettemaydose4smokingThresholdlowestdiscriminatedcontentthresholdssmokersdiscriminatecontents2session04 mg/g16 mg/gbehaviorSubjectiveperceptionschoicealso11 mg/ggreatersubthresholdviaRATIONALE:"dose"containingvirtuallyhelpinformminimummaintainingdependenceOBJECTIVES:SpectrumresearchNIDAdifferingusedevaluateproceduredetermineMETHODS:Dependentn = 1813 M5 Ftestedability11513 mg/goneper"ultralow"9-10 mg"tar"Exposurelimitedpuffs/trialsubjectsabstinentovernightpriornumbersessionsdeterminedparticipant'ssuccess>80 %trialsbehavioralassessedrelatedRESULTS:medianrangesuggestingwidevariabilityComparedultralowpuffsubject'smarginalnextdifferedsubjectivewithdrawalreliefCONCLUSIONS:testingconditionsdiscriminatingcanone-halfone-quarteramountstudyproceduresexposureamountsidentifysystematicdifferencesChoiceCigaretteDiscriminationNicotineeffects

Similar Articles

Cited By