Global architecture of gestational diabetes research: density-equalizing mapping studies and gender analysis.

Dörthe Brüggmann, Theresa Richter, Doris Klingelhöfer, Alexander Gerber, Matthias Bundschuh, Jenny Jaque, David A Groneberg
Author Information
  1. Dörthe Brüggmann: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  2. Theresa Richter: Department of Female Health and Preventive Medicine, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  3. Doris Klingelhöfer: Department of Female Health and Preventive Medicine, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  4. Alexander Gerber: Department of Female Health and Preventive Medicine, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  5. Matthias Bundschuh: Department of Female Health and Preventive Medicine, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
  6. Jenny Jaque: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  7. David A Groneberg: Department of Female Health and Preventive Medicine, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Social Medicine and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany. occup-med@uni-frankfurt.de.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with substantial morbidity for mothers and their offspring. While clinical and basic research activities on this important disease grow constantly, there is no concise analysis of global architecture of GDM research. Hence, it was the objective of this study to assess the global scientific performance chronologically, geographically and in relation to existing research networks and gender distribution of publishing authors.
STUDY DESIGN: On the basis of the New Quality and Quantity Indices in Science (NewQIS) platform, scientometric methods were combined with modern visualizing techniques such as density equalizing mapping, and the Web of Science database was used to assess GDM-related entries from 1900 to 2012.
RESULTS: Twelve thousand five hundred four GDM-related publications were identified and analyzed. The USA (4295 publications) and the UK (1354 publications) dominated the field concerning research activity, overall citations and country-specific Hirsch-Index, which quantified the impact of a country's published research on the scientific community. Semi-qualitative indices such as country-specific citation rates ranked New Zealand and the UK at top positions. Annual collaborative publications increased steeply between the years 1990 and 2012 (71 to 1157 respectively). Subject category analysis pointed to a minor interest of public health issues in GDM research. Gender analysis in terms of publication authorship revealed a clear dominance of the male gender until 2005; then a trend towards gender equity started and the activity of female scientists grew visibly in many countries. The country-specific gender analysis revealed large differences, i.e. female scientists dominated the scientific output in the USA, whereas the majority of research was published by male authors in countries such as Japan.
CONCLUSION: This study provides the first global sketch of GDM research architecture. While North-American and Western-European countries were dominating the GDM-related scientific landscape, a disparity exists in terms of research output between developed and low-resource countries. Since GDM is linked to considerable mortality and morbidity of mothers and their offspring and constitutes a tremendous burden for the healthcare systems in underserved countries, our findings emphasize the need to address disparities by fostering research endeavors, public health programs and collaborative efforts in these nations.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):1011-6 [PMID: 18936382]
  2. Vaccine. 2016 Jan 2;34(1):90-100 [PMID: 26611203]
  3. Am J Surg. 2013 Aug;206(2):263-8 [PMID: 23414631]
  4. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004 Jul;96(7):980-3 [PMID: 15253331]
  5. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;211(4):418.e1-6 [PMID: 24912097]
  6. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2009 Jun 26;4:16 [PMID: 19555514]
  7. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jun;11(6):5792-806 [PMID: 24879489]
  8. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66 Suppl 2:14-20 [PMID: 26045324]
  9. Popul Health Manag. 2009 Jun;12(3):165-74 [PMID: 19534581]
  10. EMBO Rep. 2009 Aug;10(8):800-3 [PMID: 19648952]
  11. Arch Surg. 2007 Apr;142(4):321-8 [PMID: 17438165]
  12. Int Microbiol. 2006 Jun;9(2):135-8 [PMID: 16835844]
  13. Lancet. 2009 May 23;373(9677):1773-9 [PMID: 19465232]
  14. J Viral Hepat. 2014 Nov;21(11):786-93 [PMID: 24205854]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(10):10202-14 [PMID: 25272079]
  16. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007 Jun;34(2):173-99, vii [PMID: 17572266]
  17. Diabet Med. 2004 Feb;21(2):103-13 [PMID: 14984444]
  18. Lancet. 2009 May 23;373(9677):1789-97 [PMID: 19465234]
  19. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:23 [PMID: 22462760]
  20. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2003 Oct;62(1):47-53 [PMID: 14581157]
  21. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:16 [PMID: 19171075]
  22. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD007122 [PMID: 25604891]
  23. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1655-60 [PMID: 15547538]
  24. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;200(4):365.e1-8 [PMID: 18691691]
  25. Infect Agent Cancer. 2011 Sep 23;6 Suppl 2:S3 [PMID: 21992147]
  26. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2008 Feb 27;3 Suppl 1:S7 [PMID: 18315838]
  27. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;192(4):989-97 [PMID: 15846171]
  28. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:541 [PMID: 23734726]
  29. BMJ. 2000 Sep 30;321(7264):813-7 [PMID: 11009525]
  30. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002 Dec;12(6):362-4 [PMID: 12683645]
  31. Diabetologia. 1982 Jan;22(1):21-4 [PMID: 7060847]
  32. Lancet. 1997 Aug 2;350(9074):326-9 [PMID: 9251637]
  33. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):649-53 [PMID: 20510966]
  34. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 18;101(20):7499-504 [PMID: 15136719]
  35. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:331 [PMID: 24245856]
  36. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Sep;98(3):525-38 [PMID: 11547793]
  37. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;213(3):310-7 [PMID: 25757637]
  38. Arch Surg. 2009 Jul;144(7):635-42 [PMID: 19620543]
  39. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e112026 [PMID: 25409503]
  40. Diabet Med. 2012 Jul;29(7):844-54 [PMID: 22150506]
  41. Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36 Suppl 1:S67-74 [PMID: 23264425]
  42. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Jan;29(1):91-101 [PMID: 25182507]
  43. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;118(6):1379-93 [PMID: 22105269]
  44. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jul 1;52(1):83-4; author reply 84 [PMID: 18582642]
  45. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Jun 13;6:6 [PMID: 18554379]
  46. Neonatal Netw. 2001 Sep;20(6):17-23 [PMID: 12144115]
  47. Rheumatol Int. 2013 Nov;33(11):2743-50 [PMID: 23797780]
  48. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2014 Jan 17;9(1):2 [PMID: 24438527]
  49. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;198(1):23-7 [PMID: 18166298]
  50. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;211(6):639.e1-5 [PMID: 25439813]
  51. Int J Med Educ. 2014;5:110-24 [PMID: 25341220]
  52. BMJ. 1993 Jan 2;306(6869):37-8 [PMID: 8435576]
  53. Int J Health Geogr. 2011;10:55 [PMID: 21999813]
  54. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e97871 [PMID: 24892280]

MeSH Term

Bibliometrics
Databases, Factual
Diabetes, Gestational
Female
Geographic Mapping
Humans
Japan
Male
New Zealand
Pregnancy
Publications
Sex Factors
United Kingdom
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0researchGDManalysisgendercountriesscientificpublicationsdiabetesglobalarchitecturemappingGDM-relatedcountry-specificGestationalmellitusmorbiditymothersoffspringstudyassessauthorsNewScienceequalizing2012USAUKdominatedactivitypublishedcollaborativepublichealthGendertermsrevealedmalefemalescientistsoutputOBJECTIVE:associatedsubstantialclinicalbasicactivitiesimportantdiseasegrowconstantlyconciseHenceobjectiveperformancechronologicallygeographicallyrelationexistingnetworksdistributionpublishingSTUDYDESIGN:basisQualityQuantityIndicesNewQISplatformscientometricmethodscombinedmodernvisualizingtechniquesdensityWebdatabaseusedentries1900RESULTS:Twelvethousandfivehundredfouridentifiedanalyzed42951354fieldconcerningoverallcitationsHirsch-Indexquantifiedimpactcountry'scommunitySemi-qualitativeindicescitationratesrankedZealandtoppositionsAnnualincreasedsteeplyyears1990711157respectivelySubjectcategorypointedminorinterestissuespublicationauthorshipcleardominance2005trendtowardsequitystartedgrewvisiblymanylargedifferencesiewhereasmajorityJapanCONCLUSION:providesfirstsketchNorth-AmericanWestern-Europeandominatinglandscapedisparityexistsdevelopedlow-resourceSincelinkedconsiderablemortalityconstitutestremendousburdenhealthcaresystemsunderservedfindingsemphasizeneedaddressdisparitiesfosteringendeavorsprogramseffortsnationsGlobalgestationalresearch:density-equalizingstudiesDensityDiabetesScientometrics

Similar Articles

Cited By