The effect of gabapentin and pregabalin on intestinal incision wound healing in rabbits.

M Korkmaz, T B Saritas, A Sevimli, Z K Saritas, B Elitok
Author Information
  1. M Korkmaz: Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
  2. T B Saritas: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Meram Medical School, Necmettin Erbakan University, 42080, Konya, Turkey.
  3. A Sevimli: Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
  4. Z K Saritas: Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
  5. B Elitok: Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the macroscopic and histologic effects of pregabalin (PG) gabapentin (GB) on longitudinal intestinal wound healing in New Zealand rabbits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The animals were divided into three groups randomly; the control group (n=6), PG group (n=6) and GB group (n=6). All animals were premedicated with xylazine HCI, 5 mg/kg i.m. and general anaesthesia was performed by ketamine HCI 50 mg/kg i.m injection. A 4 cm incision in the caecum through median laparotomy was achieved under aseptic surgery. Intestinal wound was closed with double-sutured. All animals were received parenteral antibiotic treatment for 5 days. PG and GB groups were treated by PG (30 mg/kg, oral, daily) and GB (30 mg/kg, oral, daily) for 10 days respectively. Control group did not receive any treatment. The animals were euthanized on day 10 and the caecum was examined by laparotomy. Adhesion formation was observed, and tissue samples were taken from suture lines for histologic examination. Cellular infiltration (polymorphonuclear white blood cells and mononuclear cells), accumulation of connective tissue, vascularization and extent of necrosis were evaluated and scored separately for each of mucosal, submucosal, muscular and serosal layers of caecum.
RESULTS: Adhesions were more severe in the GB group compared to other groups. No statistically significant differences were detected among the three groups about the wound healing.
CONCLUSION: It was suggested that the use of gabapentinoids had no significant effect on wound healing in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery and further studies with treatment periods longer than 10 days are needed.

Keywords

References

  1. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2013 Oct;30(5):286-92 [PMID: 24353488]
  2. Am J Surg. 1993 Feb;165(2):229-32 [PMID: 8427402]
  3. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1991;(566):1-51 [PMID: 1725603]
  4. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Dec;99(6):775-86 [PMID: 18006529]
  5. Anesth Analg. 2007 Dec;105(6):1805-15 [PMID: 18042886]
  6. J Invest Surg. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):112-6 [PMID: 19283613]
  7. Surg Clin North Am. 1984 Aug;64(4):721-33 [PMID: 6382655]
  8. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jun;104(6):1545-56, table of contents [PMID: 17513656]
  9. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct;18(5):865-80 [PMID: 15494283]
  10. J Trauma. 2011 Mar;70(3):595-602 [PMID: 21610348]
  11. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;6(1):108-13 [PMID: 16376147]
  12. Anesthesiology. 2008 Aug;109(2):243-50 [PMID: 18648233]
  13. Gastroenterology. 1987 Feb;92(2):400-5 [PMID: 3792777]
  14. Am J Surg. 1999 Oct;178(4):293-7 [PMID: 10587186]
  15. Am J Surg. 1998 Aug;176(2A Suppl):26S-38S [PMID: 9777970]
  16. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;104(4):401-6 [PMID: 20207747]
  17. Br J Surg. 1985 Oct;72(10):831-4 [PMID: 4041717]
  18. Nurs Times. 2010 Nov 16-22;106(45):10-3 [PMID: 21180335]
  19. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Apr;58(4):371-8 [PMID: 21174182]
  20. Ann Surg. 1992 Mar;215(3):276-81 [PMID: 1543401]
  21. Neuropharmacology. 2008 Oct;55(5):724-8 [PMID: 18598708]
  22. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Sep 7;15(33):4156-62 [PMID: 19725150]
  23. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Apr;106(4):454-62 [PMID: 21357616]
  24. Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):748-53 [PMID: 25348659]
  25. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1968 Apr;126(4):747-53 [PMID: 4868381]
  26. Am Surg. 1997 Mar;63(3):266-9 [PMID: 9036897]
  27. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Aug;54(7):885-93 [PMID: 20039844]
  28. BMC Surg. 2014 Apr 24;14:23 [PMID: 24762063]
  29. Anaesthesia. 2000 Sep;55(9):904-10 [PMID: 10947757]
  30. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(37):6053-69 [PMID: 22747536]
  31. Am Fam Physician. 2001 May 15;63(10):1979-84 [PMID: 11388713]
  32. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Jan;396(1):133-7 [PMID: 20614131]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0woundGBgroupPGhealinganimalsgroupsmg/kgpregabalingabapentinintestinaln=6caecumtreatmentdays10histologicrabbitsthreeHCI5imincisionlaparotomysurgery30oraldailytissuecellssignificanteffectAIM:evaluatemacroscopiceffectslongitudinalNewZealandMATERIALSANDMETHODS:dividedrandomlycontrolpremedicatedxylazinegeneralanaesthesiaperformedketamine50injection4cmmedianachievedasepticIntestinalcloseddouble-suturedreceivedparenteralantibiotictreatedrespectivelyControlreceiveeuthanizeddayexaminedAdhesionformationobservedsamplestakensuturelinesexaminationCellularinfiltrationpolymorphonuclearwhitebloodmononuclearaccumulationconnectivevascularizationextentnecrosisevaluatedscoredseparatelymucosalsubmucosalmuscularserosallayersRESULTS:AdhesionsseverecomparedstatisticallydifferencesdetectedamongCONCLUSION:suggestedusegabapentinoidspatientsundergoinggastrointestinalstudiesperiodslongerneededincisionalrabbit

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)