More Than Meets the Eye: Split-Second Social Perception.

Jonathan B Freeman, Kerri L Johnson
Author Information
  1. Jonathan B Freeman: Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA. Electronic address: jon.freeman@nyu.edu.
  2. Kerri L Johnson: Department of Communication Studies and Psychology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Abstract

Recent research suggests that visual perception of social categories is shaped not only by facial features but also by higher-order social cognitive processes (e.g., stereotypes, attitudes, goals). Building on neural computational models of social perception, we outline a perspective of how multiple bottom-up visual cues are flexibly integrated with a range of top-down processes to form perceptions, and we identify a set of key brain regions involved. During this integration, 'hidden' social category activations are often triggered which temporarily impact perception without manifesting in explicit perceptual judgments. Importantly, these hidden impacts and other aspects of the perceptual process predict downstream social consequences - from politicians' electoral success to several evaluative biases - independently of the outcomes of that process.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;106(6):897-911 [PMID: 24841095]
  2. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2109-28 [PMID: 17118927]
  3. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Aug;13(8):360-6 [PMID: 19647475]
  4. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e69684 [PMID: 23936077]
  5. Soc Neurosci. 2011;6(2):139-55 [PMID: 20602284]
  6. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25107 [PMID: 21977227]
  7. Science. 2006 Nov 24;314(5803):1311-4 [PMID: 17124325]
  8. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Feb;8(2):123-33 [PMID: 23051902]
  9. Psychol Sci. 2013 Feb 1;24(2):160-6 [PMID: 23300228]
  10. Cognition. 2011 May;119(2):265-80 [PMID: 21349506]
  11. Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;24(4):498-506 [PMID: 23474830]
  12. J Neurosci. 2001 Jun 15;21(12):RC150 [PMID: 11404442]
  13. Psychol Sci. 2004 Oct;15(10):674-9 [PMID: 15447638]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 24;111(25):9079-84 [PMID: 24927595]
  15. Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jun;7(6):651-7 [PMID: 15156149]
  16. Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;118(2):247-79 [PMID: 21355661]
  17. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Oct;8(7):750-5 [PMID: 22661619]
  18. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):223-233 [PMID: 10827445]
  19. Psychol Rev. 1982 Jan;89(1):60-94 [PMID: 7058229]
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 10;104(15):6430-5 [PMID: 17404215]
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jul;83(1):5-25 [PMID: 12088132]
  22. Cortex. 2015 Aug;69:131-40 [PMID: 26046623]
  23. J Comp Neurol. 2009 Jun 20;514(6):595-623 [PMID: 19363802]
  24. Behav Res Methods. 2010 Feb;42(1):286-91 [PMID: 20160307]
  25. Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 20;2:59 [PMID: 21687437]
  26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Nov 12;99(23):15238-43 [PMID: 12417766]
  27. Psychol Sci. 2016 Apr;27(4):502-17 [PMID: 26976082]
  28. Front Psychol. 2012 Jun 04;3:160 [PMID: 22675313]
  29. Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):383-6 [PMID: 16683924]
  30. Neuron. 2007 Jun 7;54(5):677-96 [PMID: 17553419]
  31. Psychol Sci. 2009 Oct;20(10):1183-8 [PMID: 19686295]
  32. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Dec;8(12):976-87 [PMID: 18026167]
  33. Prog Neurobiol. 2004 Apr;72(5):341-72 [PMID: 15157726]
  34. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Sep;22(9):2005-15 [PMID: 22021913]
  35. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):705-12 [PMID: 21512838]
  36. Psychol Sci. 2015 Feb;26(2):122-34 [PMID: 25515527]
  37. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jan;82(1):5-18 [PMID: 11811634]
  38. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan 14;41(3):405-419 [PMID: 25589598]
  39. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015 Jun;41(6):769-78 [PMID: 25810414]
  40. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jan;102(1):116-31 [PMID: 21875229]
  41. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Dec;11(12):535-43 [PMID: 17997124]
  42. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1259-76 [PMID: 24079449]
  43. Neuropsychology. 2011 Mar;25(2):185-92 [PMID: 21381825]
  44. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;13(9):403-9 [PMID: 19716752]
  45. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Oct;36(10):1318-31 [PMID: 20682754]
  46. Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;19(11):1131-9 [PMID: 19076485]
  47. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):85-92 [PMID: 23807761]
  48. Emotion. 2004 Dec;4(4):378-88 [PMID: 15571436]
  49. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013 Mar 1;49(2):206-210 [PMID: 23355750]
  50. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010 Jan;31(1):150-9 [PMID: 19618409]
  51. J Neurosci. 2010 Nov 10;30(45):15085-96 [PMID: 21068314]
  52. J Neurosci. 2007 Nov 28;27(48):13232-40 [PMID: 18045917]
  53. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jan;8(1):107-13 [PMID: 15592463]
  54. Neuron. 2012 Jul 26;75(2):265-70 [PMID: 22841311]
  55. Behav Res Methods. 2010 Feb;42(1):226-41 [PMID: 20160302]
  56. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29 [PMID: 15263892]
  57. Psychol Sci. 2004 May;15(5):342-5 [PMID: 15102145]
  58. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Jun;20(6):1314-22 [PMID: 19767310]
  59. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Sep;69(3):397-407 [PMID: 7562387]
  60. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Feb;25(2):415-22 [PMID: 24006403]
  61. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Nov;137(4):673-90 [PMID: 18999360]
  62. Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:93-120 [PMID: 10751966]
  63. Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:704-11 [PMID: 25094016]
  64. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 1;106(48):20168-73 [PMID: 19934033]
  65. Neuron. 2005 Mar 3;45(5):801-14 [PMID: 15748854]
  66. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):449-54 [PMID: 16407167]
  67. Science. 2011 Jun 17;332(6036):1446-8 [PMID: 21596956]
  68. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Mar;9(3):326-32 [PMID: 23196632]
  69. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007 Oct;28(10):915-30 [PMID: 17133388]
  70. Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jun;19(6):795-7 [PMID: 27135216]

Grants

  1. R01 HD082844/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Brain
Brain Mapping
Computational Biology
Concept Formation
Face
Facial Expression
Humans
Judgment
Social Behavior
Social Perception
Stereotyping
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0socialperceptionvisualprocessesstereotypescomputationalmodelstop-downperceptualprocess-Recentresearchsuggestscategoriesshapedfacialfeaturesalsohigher-ordercognitiveegattitudesgoalsBuildingneuraloutlineperspectivemultiplebottom-upcuesflexiblyintegratedrangeformperceptionsidentifysetkeybrainregionsinvolvedintegration'hidden'categoryactivationsoftentriggeredtemporarilyimpactwithoutmanifestingexplicitjudgmentsImportantlyhiddenimpactsaspectspredictdownstreamconsequencespoliticians'electoralsuccessseveralevaluativebiasesindependentlyoutcomesMeetsEye:Split-SecondSocialPerceptionfaceprocessingneuroimagingpersoneffects

Similar Articles

Cited By