OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
F1000Research
2016;5

Advances in laparoscopic urologic surgery techniques.

Haidar M Abdul-Muhsin, Mitchell R Humphreys
Author Information
  1. Haidar M Abdul-Muhsin: Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA.
  2. Mitchell R Humphreys: Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, USA.
PMID: 27134743 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.7660.1

Abstract

The last two decades witnessed the inception and exponential implementation of key technological advancements in laparoscopic urology. While some of these technologies thrived and became part of daily practice, others are still hindered by major challenges. This review was conducted through a comprehensive literature search in order to highlight some of the most promising technologies in laparoscopic visualization, augmented reality, and insufflation. Additionally, this review will provide an update regarding the current status of single-site and natural orifice surgery in urology.

Keywords

Augmented reality Laparoendoscopic Laparoendoscopic single site surgery insufflation devices laparoscopic urology natural orifice transluminal surgery

References

  1. World J Urol. 2016 Apr;34(4):533-7 [PMID: 25841361]
  2. Surg Innov. 2013 Apr;20(2):158-63 [PMID: 22549904]
  3. J Biomed Opt. 2011 Jun;16(6):066003 [PMID: 21721804]
  4. J Endourol. 2009 Nov;23(11):1887-92 [PMID: 19839748]
  5. J Endourol. 2011 Feb;25(2):245-50 [PMID: 21058889]
  6. Urology. 2011 Mar;77(3):518-23 [PMID: 21376997]
  7. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):11-23 [PMID: 25840896]
  8. Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Aug;32(8):773-85 [PMID: 25093879]
  9. J Endourol. 2008 Apr;22(4):803-10 [PMID: 18366316]
  10. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010 Sep;17(5):629-36 [PMID: 19798463]
  11. JAMA. 2014 Dec 3;312(21):2213-4 [PMID: 25461994]
  12. Eur Urol. 2008 Jun;53(6):1290-4 [PMID: 17997020]
  13. Arch Esp Urol. 2012 Apr;65(3):385-92 [PMID: 22495279]
  14. Urology. 2014 Feb;83(2):266-73 [PMID: 24149104]
  15. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):1079-83 [PMID: 25987523]
  16. Hepatology. 1996 Jan;23(1):137-44 [PMID: 8550033]
  17. Int Surg. 2015 Jun;100(6):1134-7 [PMID: 26414836]
  18. J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):783-9; discussion 789-90 [PMID: 19091336]
  19. J Endourol. 2008 May;22(5):1087-91 [PMID: 18419337]
  20. Curr Urol Rep. 2015 Apr;16(4):20 [PMID: 25698588]
  21. J Cell Sci. 1996 Oct;109 ( Pt 10):2509-20 [PMID: 8923212]
  22. Surg Technol Int. 2014 Nov;25:37-41 [PMID: 25433265]
  23. BJU Int. 2009 Nov;104(9):1260-4 [PMID: 19426194]
  24. J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):58-62 [PMID: 24983138]
  25. BJU Int. 2008 Dec;102(11):1715-8 [PMID: 18778358]
  26. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):1011-7 [PMID: 25982854]
  27. J Endourol. 2009 Mar;23(3):367-71 [PMID: 19196056]
  28. Urology. 2009 Apr;73(4):896-900 [PMID: 19193404]
  29. Urology. 2012 Sep;80(3):590-5 [PMID: 22925236]
  30. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1996 Feb;24(1):19-44 [PMID: 8827582]
  31. J Endourol. 2015 Aug;29(8):933-8 [PMID: 25811682]
  32. J Endourol. 2011 Mar;25(3):511-7 [PMID: 21142942]
  33. J Endourol. 2013 May;27(5):579-82 [PMID: 23186377]
  34. J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):669-75 [PMID: 19335320]
  35. Arch Surg. 1997 Mar;132(3):272-8 [PMID: 9125027]
  36. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Oct;47(10 ):1665-9 [PMID: 26267670]
  37. Eur Urol. 2010 Apr;57(4):723-6 [PMID: 19913991]
  38. Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):485-9 [PMID: 19585068]
  39. Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):268-72 [PMID: 24962843]
  40. J Urol. 1991 Aug;146(2):278-82 [PMID: 1830346]
  41. Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1211-7 [PMID: 21996106]
  42. BJU Int. 2009 Jun;103(11):1537-41 [PMID: 19489791]
  43. Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Oct;14(5):496-505 [PMID: 23740382]
  44. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000 Jul-Aug;45(1):15-27 [PMID: 10946079]
  45. Eur Urol. 2016 Feb;69(2):376-7 [PMID: 26361168]
  46. J Robot Surg. 2016 Mar;10 (1):57-61 [PMID: 26559538]
  47. Ugeskr Laeger. 2015 Jun 22;177(26):null [PMID: 26099183]
  48. Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):926-32 [PMID: 22011949]
  49. J Endourol. 2007 Jun;21(6):640-4 [PMID: 17638562]
  50. Urology. 2013 Jul;82(1):84-9 [PMID: 23676357]
  51. Urology. 2013 May;81(5):1090-4 [PMID: 23490523]
  52. J Urol. 2006 Apr;175(4):1304-10 [PMID: 16515987]
  53. Urology. 2002 Mar;59(3):446-50 [PMID: 11880100]
  54. J Endourol. 2008 Nov;22(11):2575-81 [PMID: 19046097]
  55. Ophthalmology. 1994 Mar;101(3):529-33 [PMID: 8127574]
  56. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2014 Mar;66(1):25-35 [PMID: 24721938]
  57. Urology. 2012 Apr;79(4):958-64 [PMID: 22336035]
  58. Urology. 2012 Sep;80(3):608-13 [PMID: 22925237]
  59. Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):996-1000 [PMID: 18455769]
  60. JAMA. 2004 Nov 10;292(18):2214-5 [PMID: 15536106]
  61. Urology. 2015 Jun;85(6):1252-6 [PMID: 26099869]
  62. Eur Urol. 2014 Mar;65(3):671-2 [PMID: 24262103]
  63. Eur Urol. 2009 Aug;56(2):332-8 [PMID: 19477580]
  64. Int J Urol. 2013 Feb;20(2):172-6 [PMID: 22925445]
  65. Urology. 2012 Dec;80(6):1171-5 [PMID: 23206759]
Journal Article Review

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0laparoscopicsurgeryurologytechnologiesreviewrealityinsufflationnaturalorificeLaparoendoscopiclasttwodecadeswitnessedinceptionexponentialimplementationkeytechnologicaladvancementsthrivedbecamepartdailypracticeothersstillhinderedmajorchallengesconductedcomprehensiveliteraturesearchorderhighlightpromisingvisualizationaugmentedAdditionallywillprovideupdateregardingcurrentstatussingle-siteAdvancesurologictechniquesAugmentedsinglesitedevicestransluminal

Similar Articles

Cited By