School- and Individual-level Predictors of Weight Status Misperception among Korean Adolescents: A National Online Survey.

Yongjoo Kim, Ichiro Kawachi
Author Information
  1. Yongjoo Kim: Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  2. Ichiro Kawachi: Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growing body of literature has reported that weight status estimation pattern, including accurate-, under-, and overestimation, was associated with weight related behaviors and weight change among adolescents and young adults. However, there have been a few studies investigating the potential role of school contexts in shaping adolescents' weight status estimation pattern among Korea adolescents.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between weight status misperception patterns and factors at individual-, family-, and school-level, simultaneously, and whether there was significant between schools variation in the distribution of each weight status misperception pattern, underestimation and overestimation respectively, among Korean adolescents aged 12-18 years.
METHOD: Data from the Eighth Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey (KYRBS), 2012, a nationally representative online survey of 72,228 students (boys = 37,229, girls = 34,999) from a total of 797 middle and high schools were used. Sex stratified multilevel random intercept multinomial logistic models where adolescents (level 1) were nested within schools (level 2) were performed.
RESULTS: At the school level, attending a school with higher average BMI (kg/m2) was positively associated with weight status underestimation, and inversely associated with weight status overestimation among boys and girls. Single-sex schooling was positively associated with weight status underestimation among girls. At the family level, higher household income (high/middle versus low) was inversely associated with both weight status under- and overestimation among boys and girls. Higher maternal education (equal to or more than college graduate versus equal to or less than high school graduate) was positively associated with weight status overestimation among boys, and living with both parents (compared to not living with both parents) was inversely associated with weight status underestimation among girls. At the individual level, high academic achievement (compared to low) was positively associated with weight status underestimation among boys and girls.
CONCLUSIONS: While further research with prospective designs and objectively measured anthropometric information is needed, school environmental factors such as sex composition and school average BMI, as well as, family contexts such as socioeconomic status need to be considered when developing and implementing obesity prevention programs.

References

  1. Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Dec;46(8):790-800 [PMID: 23983018]
  2. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Dec;39(12):1721-6 [PMID: 26248659]
  3. J Sch Health. 2014 Dec;84(12):759-68 [PMID: 25388592]
  4. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Jun;16(6):1324-30 [PMID: 18356836]
  5. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Oct;39(10):1488-93 [PMID: 26155919]
  6. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Apr;17(4):790-5 [PMID: 19148119]
  7. J Sch Health. 2011 Feb;81(2):57-64 [PMID: 21223272]
  8. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):536-46 [PMID: 25135882]
  9. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jan;14(1):93-100 [PMID: 20188006]
  10. Diabetes Metab J. 2014 Feb;38(1):35-43 [PMID: 24627826]
  11. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Feb;40(2):328-32 [PMID: 26303350]
  12. Eat Disord. 2013;21(2):91-108 [PMID: 23421693]
  13. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014 Sep;10(9):513-4 [PMID: 25048038]
  14. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 May 13;10:797-802 [PMID: 24868156]
  15. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Apr;21(4):856-60 [PMID: 23712990]
  16. J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1382-7 [PMID: 18571258]
  17. Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;25(10):753-9 [PMID: 26303616]
  18. Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):804-14 [PMID: 21872749]
  19. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jun;32(6):1008-15 [PMID: 18317474]
  20. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e83254 [PMID: 24454697]
  21. Nutr Res Pract. 2014 Apr;8(2):213-9 [PMID: 24741407]
  22. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e72507 [PMID: 24015253]
  23. Obes Rev. 2002 Aug;3(3):183-90 [PMID: 12164470]
  24. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E171; quiz E171 [PMID: 23194779]
  25. Am J Health Behav. 2014 Sep;38(5):765-80 [PMID: 24933146]
  26. Pediatrics. 2010 Mar;125(3):e452-8 [PMID: 20142281]
  27. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):370-9 [PMID: 17652652]
  28. Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):732-40 [PMID: 25713969]
  29. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:923 [PMID: 25194699]
  30. Body Image. 2013 Sep;10(4):552-7 [PMID: 23911650]
  31. J Sch Health. 2009 Dec;79(12):585-92 [PMID: 19909422]
  32. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Jul;38(7):988-94 [PMID: 24722544]
  33. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0131322 [PMID: 26313680]
  34. Lancet. 2014 Aug 30;384(9945):766-81 [PMID: 24880830]
  35. J Prev Med Public Health. 2010 Sep;43(5):396-402 [PMID: 20959710]
  36. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51717 [PMID: 23251609]
  37. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:421 [PMID: 19922675]
  38. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jun;134:1-11 [PMID: 25863424]
  39. Prev Med. 2010 Dec;51(6):460-5 [PMID: 20955726]
  40. Am J Public Health. 2011 Jun;101(6):e1-4 [PMID: 21493926]
  41. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Apr;39(4):601-7 [PMID: 25370575]
  42. Obes Rev. 2005 Nov;6(4):271-4 [PMID: 16246212]
  43. Health Place. 2015 Jan;31:224-32 [PMID: 25579227]
  44. J Epidemiol. 2014;24(2):109-16 [PMID: 24531001]
  45. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Oct;75(7):1175-83 [PMID: 22749656]
  46. NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Jul;(158):1-7 [PMID: 25052533]
  47. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:20 [PMID: 21426567]
  48. Acad Pediatr. 2013 Jul-Aug;13(4):371-8 [PMID: 23830022]
  49. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:452 [PMID: 24885579]
  50. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Aug;35(8):1063-70 [PMID: 21042327]
  51. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Dec;21(12):2596-603 [PMID: 23512737]
  52. Am J Prev Med. 2003 May;24(4):332-9 [PMID: 12726871]
  53. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):79 [PMID: 26818029]
  54. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Dec;161(12):1154-61 [PMID: 18056560]
  55. Prev Med. 2006 Mar;42(3):229-34 [PMID: 16458956]
  56. J Adolesc Health. 2005 Nov;37(5):371-5 [PMID: 16227121]
  57. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Apr;30(4):644-51 [PMID: 16151414]
  58. Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr;16(3):267-74 [PMID: 26210909]
  59. Nutr Res Pract. 2010 Dec;4(6):499-506 [PMID: 21286408]
  60. J Sch Health. 2014 Feb;84(2):116-23 [PMID: 25099426]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior
Body Image
Body Weight
Female
Health Behavior
Humans
Male
Parents
Republic of Korea
Risk-Taking
Schools
Self Concept
Sex Factors
Social Class
Socioeconomic Factors
Students
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0weightstatusamongassociatedschoolgirlsoverestimationunderestimationboysleveladolescentspositivelypatternschoolshighinverselyestimationunder-contextsKoreamisperceptionfactorsKoreanSurvey=higheraverageBMIfamilyversuslowequalgraduatelivingparentscomparedBACKGROUND:Growingbodyliteraturereportedincludingaccurate-relatedbehaviorschangeyoungadultsHoweverstudiesinvestigatingpotentialroleshapingadolescents'OBJECTIVE:aimpresentstudyinvestigateassociationpatternsindividual-family-school-levelsimultaneouslywhethersignificantvariationdistributionrespectivelyaged12-18yearsMETHOD:DataEighthYouthRiskBehaviorWeb-basedKYRBS2012nationallyrepresentativeonlinesurvey72228students3722934999total797middleusedSexstratifiedmultilevelrandominterceptmultinomiallogisticmodels1nestedwithin2performedRESULTS:attendingkg/m2Single-sexschoolinghouseholdincomehigh/middleHighermaternaleducationcollegelessindividualacademicachievementCONCLUSIONS:researchprospectivedesignsobjectivelymeasuredanthropometricinformationneededenvironmentalsexcompositionwellsocioeconomicneedconsidereddevelopingimplementingobesitypreventionprogramsSchool-Individual-levelPredictorsWeightStatusMisperceptionAdolescents:NationalOnline

Similar Articles

Cited By