OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
International journal of language & communication disorders
11, 2016;51 (6): 703-714.

Addressing phonological memory in language therapy with clients who have Down syndrome: Perspectives of speech-language pathologists.

Gayle G Faught, Frances A Conners, Angela B Barber, Hannah R Price
Author Information
  1. Gayle G Faught: Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA. eggraham@crimson.ua.edu.
  2. Frances A Conners: Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
  3. Angela B Barber: Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
  4. Hannah R Price: Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
PMID: 27150499 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12241

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phonological memory (PM) plays a significant role in language development but is impaired in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). Without formal recommendations on how to address PM limitations in clients with DS, it is possible speech-language pathologists (SLPs) find ways to do so in their practices.
AIMS: This study asked if and how SLPs address PM in language therapy with clients who have DS. It also asked about SLPs' opinions of the importance, practicality and difficulty of addressing PM in clients with DS.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: SLPs participated in an online survey that asked if they address PM in clients with DS and, if so, how often and with which techniques. The survey also asked SLPs to rate their opinions of addressing PM in clients with DS with Likert scales. To contrast clients with DS, SLPs were asked about their practices and opinions with clients who have specific language impairment (SLI) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). SLPs were recruited through e-mails sent from state organizations and researchers. To compare SLPs' practices and opinions across client types, frequency analyses and analyses of variance (ANOVAs) were run.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: In all, 290 SLPs from 28 states completed the survey. Nearly all SLPs were currently practising at the time data were collected, and all worked with at least one of the three client types. Findings indicated SLPs less often addressed PM and used less variety when addressing PM with clients who have DS compared with clients who have SLI or ASD. Further, SLPs considered it less important, less practical and more difficult to address PM in clients who have DS when compared with clients who have SLI, whereas a similar pattern was found with clients who have ASD.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: SLPs' opinions could be one reason they under-address PM with clients who have DS. Other reasons include there are no evidence-based practice (EBP) guidelines on this topic, and there is not enough familiarity with the DS phenotype among SLPs. Future research on ways to address PM in clients with DS successfully are essential so that EBP guidelines can be established and language therapy can be made more effective.

Keywords

Down syndrome autism spectrum disorders (ASD) phonological memory specific language impairment (SLI) speech and language pathologists speech and language therapy

References

  1. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Dec;55(6):1600-12 [PMID: 22473836]
  2. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Jul;34(7):2251-6 [PMID: 23644229]
  3. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;41(2):233-44 [PMID: 10750549]
  4. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Feb;102(2):196-218 [PMID: 18707692]
  5. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Sep;42(6):741-8 [PMID: 11583246]
  6. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):432-43 [PMID: 23889838]
  7. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;53(10 ):1044-53 [PMID: 22533801]
  8. Am J Ment Retard. 2004 Jul;109(4):285-300 [PMID: 15176918]
  9. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;39(8):1119-30 [PMID: 9844982]
  10. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Feb;56(1):295-309 [PMID: 22744141]
  11. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005 Feb;48(1):172-88 [PMID: 15938064]
  12. J Autism Dev Disord. 2014 Jan;44(1):19-30 [PMID: 23670577]
  13. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014 Jan;119(1):17-32 [PMID: 24450319]
  14. J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 May;91(1):1-23 [PMID: 15814093]
  15. Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):2225-34 [PMID: 21628091]
  16. J Commun Disord. 2000 May-Jun;33(3):241-65; quiz 265-6 [PMID: 10907718]
  17. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Mar 28;63(2):1-21 [PMID: 24670961]
  18. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007;13(3):228-36 [PMID: 17910084]
  19. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Feb;56(1):178-210 [PMID: 23275397]
  20. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Dec;46(6):1324-39 [PMID: 14700358]
  21. Am J Ment Retard. 2003 May;108(3):149-60 [PMID: 12691594]
  22. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Apr;61(4):505-14 [PMID: 18300182]
  23. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Dec;45(6):1158-74 [PMID: 12546485]
  24. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Dec;47(6):1334-46 [PMID: 15842014]
  25. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010 Dec;88(12):1008-16 [PMID: 20878909]
  26. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;45(2):326-37 [PMID: 14982246]
  27. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 May-Jun;48(3):343-9 [PMID: 23650890]
  28. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008 Mar;52(Pt 3):244-55 [PMID: 18261023]
  29. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Jun;49(3):526-47 [PMID: 16787894]
  30. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Feb;49(1):3-15 [PMID: 16533069]
  31. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007;13(3):247-61 [PMID: 17910087]
  32. J Child Lang. 2013 Jan;40(1):244-65 [PMID: 23217297]
  33. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Jun;45(3):531-44 [PMID: 12069005]

Grants

  1. R01 HD055345/NICHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Down Syndrome
Humans
Language Therapy
Pathologists
Speech
Speech-Language Pathology
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0clientsDSPMSLPslanguageaddressaskedopinionstherapySLIASDlessmemorypathologistspracticesSLPs'addressing&surveysyndromespeech-languagewaysalsooftenspecificimpairmentautismspectrumdisordersclienttypesanalysesonecomparedEBPguidelinescanphonologicalspeechBACKGROUND:PhonologicalplayssignificantroledevelopmentimpairedindividualsWithoutformalrecommendationslimitationspossiblefindAIMS:studyimportancepracticalitydifficultyMETHODSPROCEDURES:participatedonlinetechniquesrateLikertscalescontrastrecruitede-mailssentstateorganizationsresearcherscompareacrossfrequencyvarianceANOVAsrunOUTCOMESRESULTS:29028statescompletedNearlycurrentlypractisingtimedatacollectedworkedleastthreeFindingsindicatedaddressedusedvarietyconsideredimportantpracticaldifficultwhereassimilarpatternfoundCONCLUSIONSIMPLICATIONS:reasonunder-addressreasonsincludeevidence-basedpracticetopicenoughfamiliarityphenotypeamongFutureresearchsuccessfullyessentialestablishedmadeeffectiveAddressingsyndrome:PerspectivesDown

Similar Articles

Cited By