Analysis of Thrombophilia Test Ordering Practices at an Academic Center: A Proposal for Appropriate Testing to Reduce Harm and Cost.

Yu-Min Shen, Judy Tsai, Evelyn Taiwo, Chakri Gavva, Sean G Yates, Vivek Patel, Eugene Frenkel, Ravi Sarode
Author Information
  1. Yu-Min Shen: Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
  2. Judy Tsai: Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
  3. Evelyn Taiwo: Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
  4. Chakri Gavva: Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America. ORCID
  5. Sean G Yates: Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
  6. Vivek Patel: Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
  7. Eugene Frenkel: Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
  8. Ravi Sarode: Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.

Abstract

Ideally, Thrombophilia testing should be tailored to the type of thrombotic event without the influence of anticoagulation therapy or acute phase effects which can give false positive results that may result in long term anticoagulation. However, Thrombophilia testing is often performed routinely in unselected patients. We analyzed all consecutive Thrombophilia testing orders during the months of October and November 2009 at an academic teaching institution. Information was extracted from electronic medical records for the following: indication, timing, comprehensiveness of tests, anticoagulation therapy at the time of testing, and confirmatory repeat testing, if any. Based on the findings of this analysis, we established local guidelines in May 2013 for appropriate Thrombophilia testing, primarily to prevent testing during the acute thrombotic event or while the patient is on anticoagulation. We then evaluated ordering practices 22 months after guideline implementation. One hundred seventy-three patients were included in the study. Only 34% (58/173) had appropriate indications (unprovoked venous or arterial thrombosis or pregnancy losses). 51% (61/119) with an index clinical event were tested within one week of the event. Although 46% (79/173) were found to have abnormal results, only 46% of these had the abnormal tests repeated for confirmation with 54% potentially carrying a wrong diagnosis with long term anticoagulation. Twenty-two months after guideline implementation, there was an 84% reduction in ordered tests. Thus, this study revealed that a significant proportion of Thrombophilia testing was inappropriately performed. We implemented local guidelines for Thrombophilia testing for clinicians, resulting in a reduction in healthcare costs and improved patient care.

References

  1. J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Jul;7 Suppl 1:1-8 [PMID: 19630756]
  2. J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Apr;5(4):692-9 [PMID: 17367492]
  3. Br J Haematol. 2010 Apr;149(2):209-20 [PMID: 20128794]
  4. Stroke. 2010 Dec;41(12):2985-90 [PMID: 20947844]
  5. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e419S-94S [PMID: 22315268]
  6. Br J Haematol. 2012 Jun;157(6):653-63 [PMID: 22530883]
  7. Br J Haematol. 2012 Apr;157(1):47-58 [PMID: 22313321]
  8. Blood. 2013 Dec 5;122(24):3879-83 [PMID: 24307720]
  9. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15:11 [PMID: 25880934]
  10. Thromb Res. 2015 Dec;136(6):1160-4 [PMID: 26477821]
  11. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 7;346(10):752-63 [PMID: 11882732]
  12. Mol Genet Metab. 2000 Sep-Oct;71(1-2):51-61 [PMID: 11001795]
  13. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015 Apr;3(2):228-35 [PMID: 26993845]
  14. J Thromb Haemost. 2003 Mar;1(3):412-3 [PMID: 12871439]
  15. Nature. 1965 Oct 9;208(5006):143-5 [PMID: 4956920]
  16. J Clin Invest. 1981 Nov;68(5):1370-3 [PMID: 6895379]
  17. J Clin Invest. 1984 Dec;74(6):2082-8 [PMID: 6239877]
  18. J Rheumatol. 1989 May;16(5):614-7 [PMID: 2754665]
  19. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1992 Dec;3(6):749-58 [PMID: 1489896]
  20. Nature. 1994 May 5;369(6475):64-7 [PMID: 8164741]
  21. Thromb Haemost. 1994 Sep;72(3):352-8 [PMID: 7855783]
  22. Blood. 1996 Nov 15;88(10):3698-703 [PMID: 8916933]
  23. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1997 Sep-Oct;15(5):541-4 [PMID: 9307863]
  24. Thromb Diath Haemorrh. 1965 Jun 15;13:516-30 [PMID: 14347873]
  25. Health Technol Assess. 2006 Apr;10(11):1-110 [PMID: 16595080]
  26. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2009 Oct;35(7):695-710 [PMID: 20013536]

MeSH Term

Academic Medical Centers
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Blood Coagulation Tests
Comorbidity
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Care Costs
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
Retrospective Studies
Thrombophilia
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0testingthrombophiliaanticoagulationeventmonthsteststhrombotictherapyacuteresultslongtermperformedpatientslocalguidelinesappropriatepatientguidelineimplementationstudy46%abnormalreductionIdeallytailoredtypewithoutinfluencephaseeffectscangivefalsepositivemayresultHoweveroftenroutinelyunselectedanalyzedconsecutiveordersOctoberNovember2009academicteachinginstitutionInformationextractedelectronicmedicalrecordsfollowing:indicationtimingcomprehensivenesstimeconfirmatoryrepeatBasedfindingsanalysisestablishedMay2013primarilypreventevaluatedorderingpractices22Onehundredseventy-threeincluded34%58/173indicationsunprovokedvenousarterialthrombosispregnancylosses51%61/119indexclinicaltestedwithinoneweekAlthough79/173foundrepeatedconfirmation54%potentiallycarryingwrongdiagnosisTwenty-two84%orderedThusrevealedsignificantproportioninappropriatelyimplementedcliniciansresultinghealthcarecostsimprovedcareAnalysisThrombophiliaTestOrderingPracticesAcademicCenter:ProposalAppropriateTestingReduceHarmCost

Similar Articles

Cited By (13)