Diagnostics for Respondent-driven Sampling.

Krista J Gile, Lisa G Johnston, Matthew J Salganik
Author Information
  1. Krista J Gile: University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
  2. Lisa G Johnston: Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  3. Matthew J Salganik: Microsoft Research, New York, NY USA and Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a widely used method for sampling from hard-to-reach human populations, especially populations at higher risk for HIV. Data are collected through peer-referral over social networks. RDS has proven practical for data collection in many difficult settings and is widely used. Inference from RDS data requires many strong assumptions because the sampling design is partially beyond the control of the researcher and partially unobserved. We introduce diagnostic tools for most of these assumptions and apply them in 12 high risk populations. These diagnostics empower researchers to better understand their data and encourage future statistical research on RDS.

Keywords

References

  1. AIDS Behav. 2008 Jul;12(4 Suppl):S131-41 [PMID: 18535901]
  2. AIDS. 2005 May;19 Suppl 2:S67-72 [PMID: 15930843]
  3. Electron J Stat. 2014;8(1):1491-1521 [PMID: 26180577]
  4. AIDS Behav. 2012 May;16(4):797-806 [PMID: 22350828]
  5. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 May 9;78(2):147-57 [PMID: 15845318]
  6. Ann Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;21(4):280-9 [PMID: 21376275]
  7. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49417 [PMID: 23152902]
  8. Stat Med. 2009 Jul 30;28(17):2202-29 [PMID: 19572381]
  9. Epidemiology. 2012 Jan;23(1):138-47 [PMID: 22157309]
  10. J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6 Suppl):i73-82 [PMID: 17075727]
  11. AIDS Behav. 2005 Dec;9(4):387-402 [PMID: 16235135]
  12. AIDS Behav. 2008 Mar;12(2):294-304 [PMID: 17712620]
  13. Open AIDS J. 2012;6:77-82 [PMID: 23049656]
  14. Sociol Methodol. 2012 Aug;42(1):206-256 [PMID: 24159246]
  15. Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Nov 15;174(10):1190-6 [PMID: 22003188]
  16. Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Feb;19(1):42-51 [PMID: 18226516]
  17. PLoS One. 2009 Sep 07;4(9):e6777 [PMID: 19738904]
  18. AIDS Behav. 2005 Dec;9(4):403-8; discussion 409-13 [PMID: 16344920]
  19. Int J STD AIDS. 2013 Apr;24(4):313-21 [PMID: 23970664]
  20. Soc Netw. 2012 Oct 16;1(2):13-21 [PMID: 23641317]
  21. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Dec 1;126(3):324-32 [PMID: 22728045]
  22. Sociol Methodol. 2010 Aug;40(1):285-327 [PMID: 22969167]
  23. Sociol Methodol. 2009 Aug 1;39(1):73-116 [PMID: 20161130]
  24. Public Health Rep. 2007;122 Suppl 1:48-55 [PMID: 17354527]
  25. Sex Transm Infect. 2012 Oct;88(6):397-9 [PMID: 23012492]
  26. Ann Epidemiol. 2012 May;22(5):354-63 [PMID: 22420929]
  27. J Urban Health. 2009 Jul;86 Suppl 1:5-31 [PMID: 19472058]
  28. Epidemiology. 2012 Jan;23(1):148-50 [PMID: 22157310]
  29. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2015 Jun;178(3):619-639 [PMID: 26640328]
  30. AIDS Behav. 2013 Jul;17(6):2202-10 [PMID: 23297082]
  31. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2013;16(4):null [PMID: 24273435]
  32. Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Jun;19(3):235-7; discussion 246-7 [PMID: 18424109]
  33. Sex Transm Dis. 2013 Apr;40(4):304-10 [PMID: 23486495]
  34. AIDS Behav. 2008 Jul;12(4 Suppl):S105-30 [PMID: 18561018]
  35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Apr 13;107(15):6743-7 [PMID: 20351258]
  36. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 Aug;57 Suppl 3:S129-35 [PMID: 21857308]
  37. AIDS Behav. 2013 Sep;17 (7):2313-40 [PMID: 23568227]
  38. Sociol Methods Res. 2013 Aug;42(3):null [PMID: 24288418]
  39. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27 Suppl 1:S36-44 [PMID: 21503522]
  40. J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6 Suppl):i83-97 [PMID: 17072761]
  41. AIDS. 2010 Sep 24;24(15):2301-3 [PMID: 20634663]
  42. Int J Drug Policy. 2008 Jun;19(3):238-40; discussion 246-7 [PMID: 18434125]
  43. Sex Transm Infect. 2010 Dec;86 Suppl 2:ii11-5 [PMID: 21106509]
  44. AIDS Behav. 2013 Jul;17(6):2244-52 [PMID: 23515641]

Grants

  1. P2C HD047879/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R01 HD062366/NICHD NIH HHS
  3. R21 AG042737/NIA NIH HHS
  4. R24 HD047879/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0samplingRDSpopulationsdataRespondent-drivenwidelyusedhard-to-reachrisksocialnetworksmanyassumptionsdesignpartiallydiagnosticsmethodhumanespeciallyhigherHIVDatacollectedpeer-referralprovenpracticalcollectiondifficultsettingsInferencerequiresstrongbeyondcontrolresearcherunobservedintroducediagnostictoolsapply12highempowerresearchersbetterunderstandencouragefuturestatisticalresearchDiagnosticsSamplingHIV/AIDSexploratoryanalysislink-tracingnon-ignorablerespondent-drivensurvey

Similar Articles

Cited By