The sclerotic ring of squamates: an evo-devo-eco perspective.

Jade B Atkins, Tamara A Franz-Odendaal
Author Information
  1. Jade B Atkins: Saint Mary's University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
  2. Tamara A Franz-Odendaal: Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Abstract

The sclerotic ring consists of several bones that form in the sclera of many reptiles. This element has not been well studied in squamates, a diverse order of reptiles with a rich fossil record but debated phylogeny. Squamates inhabit many environments, display a range of behaviours, and have evolved several different body plans. Most importantly, many species have secondarily lost their sclerotic rings. This research investigates the presence of sclerotic rings in squamates and traces the lineage of these bones across evolutionary time. We compiled a database on the presence/absence of the sclerotic ring in extinct and extant squamates and investigated the evolutionary history of the sclerotic ring and how its presence/absence and morphology is correlated with environment and behaviour within this clade. Of the 400 extant species examined (59 families, 214 genera), 69% have a sclerotic ring. Those species that do not are within Serpentes, Amphisbaenia, and Dibamidae. We find that three independent losses of the sclerotic ring in squamates are supported when considering both evolutionary and developmental evidence. We also show that squamate species that lack, or have a reduced, sclerotic ring, are fossorial and headfirst burrowers. Our dataset is the largest squamate dataset with measurements of sclerotic rings, and supports previous findings that size of the ring is related to both environment occupied and behaviour. Specifically, scotopic species tend to have both larger inner and outer sclerotic ring apertures, resulting in a narrower ring of bone than those found in photopic species. Non-fossorial species also have a larger sclerotic ring than fossorial species. This research expands our knowledge of these fascinating bones; with further phylogenetic analyses scleral ossicles could become an extremely useful character trait for inferring the behaviour of fossil squamates.

Keywords

References

  1. Dev Biol. 2012 May 1;365(1):251-8 [PMID: 22370003]
  2. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jul 03;280(1765):20130508 [PMID: 23825205]
  3. Syst Biol. 2010 Dec;59(6):674-88 [PMID: 20930035]
  4. Development. 1996 Dec;123:357-67 [PMID: 9007255]
  5. Dev Biol. 1962 Dec;5:382-401 [PMID: 14023393]
  6. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2011 Sep 15;316(6):393-401 [PMID: 21506262]
  7. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Dec 1;15(12):503-507 [PMID: 11114437]
  8. Zoology (Jena). 2006;109(1):75-81 [PMID: 16377163]
  9. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2008 Feb;291(2):161-8 [PMID: 18213703]
  10. Science. 2011 Dec 23;334(6063):1641; author reply 1641 [PMID: 22194558]
  11. J Anat. 1943 Apr;77(Pt 3):225-240.2 [PMID: 17104928]
  12. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2009 Jun;292(6):798-812 [PMID: 19462447]
  13. Zoology (Jena). 2008;111(1):62-75 [PMID: 18054216]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Oct 22;281(1793): [PMID: 25186003]
  15. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 04;8(12):e80974 [PMID: 24324653]
  16. Evolution. 2006 Jan;60(1):123-41 [PMID: 16568638]
  17. J Anat. 2009 Jun;214(6):848-58 [PMID: 19538630]
  18. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2012 Apr;295(4):691-8 [PMID: 22344819]
  19. Science. 2011 May 6;332(6030):705-8 [PMID: 21493820]
  20. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2014 Aug;297(8):1407-13 [PMID: 24782331]
  21. Bioessays. 2015 Nov;37(11):1169-73 [PMID: 26411745]
  22. Nature. 2011 May 19;473(7347):364-7 [PMID: 21593869]
  23. J Anat. 2008 Jun;212(6):781-94 [PMID: 18510506]
  24. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006 Feb;192(2):97-111 [PMID: 16172892]
  25. Dev Dyn. 2008 Nov;237(11):3240-51 [PMID: 18855894]
  26. J Morphol. 2006 Nov;267(11):1326-37 [PMID: 17051547]
  27. BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Apr 29;13:93 [PMID: 23627680]

MeSH Term

Animals
Biological Evolution
Bone and Bones
Fossils
Phylogeny
Reptiles
Sclera