Disruption of Foveal Space Impairs Discrimination of Peripheral Objects.

Kimberly B Weldon, Anina N Rich, Alexandra Woolgar, Mark A Williams
Author Information
  1. Kimberly B Weldon: Perception in Action Research Centre, Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversitySydney, NSW, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie UniversitySydney, NSW, Australia.
  2. Anina N Rich: Perception in Action Research Centre, Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversitySydney, NSW, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie UniversitySydney, NSW, Australia.
  3. Alexandra Woolgar: Perception in Action Research Centre, Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversitySydney, NSW, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie UniversitySydney, NSW, Australia.
  4. Mark A Williams: Perception in Action Research Centre, Department of Cognitive Science, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie UniversitySydney, NSW, Australia; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie UniversitySydney, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

Visual space is retinotopically mapped such that peripheral objects are processed in a cortical region outside the region that represents central vision. Despite this well-known fact, neuroimaging studies have found information about peripheral objects in the foveal confluence, the cortical region representing the fovea. Further, this information is behaviorally relevant: disrupting the foveal confluence using transcranial magnetic stimulation impairs discrimination of peripheral objects at time-points consistent with a disruption of feedback. If the foveal confluence receives feedback of information about peripheral objects to boost vision, there should be behavioral consequences of this phenomenon. Here, we tested the effect of foveal distractors at different stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) on discrimination of peripheral targets. Participants performed a discrimination task on target objects presented in the periphery while fixating centrally. A visual distractor presented at the fovea ~100 ms after presentation of the targets disrupted performance more than a central distractor presented at other SOAs. This was specific to a central distractor; a peripheral distractor at the same time point did not have the same effect. These results are consistent with the claim that foveal retinotopic cortex is recruited for extra-foveal perception. This study describes a new paradigm for investigating the nature of the foveal feedback phenomenon and demonstrates the importance of this feedback in peripheral vision.

Keywords

References

  1. Cortex. 2013 Jan;49(1):327-35 [PMID: 22503283]
  2. Cereb Cortex. 1991 Jan-Feb;1(1):1-47 [PMID: 1822724]
  3. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Apr;25(4):1052-9 [PMID: 24152544]
  4. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Nov;24(11):2248-61 [PMID: 22905822]
  5. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003 Jul;20(7):1434-48 [PMID: 12868647]
  6. Psychol Res. 2007 Nov;71(6):659-66 [PMID: 16642347]
  7. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Mar;4(3):304-10 [PMID: 11224548]
  8. Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 21;3:620 [PMID: 23346068]
  9. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Oct 1;14(7):1044-53 [PMID: 12419127]
  10. Neuron. 2012 Feb 9;73(3):415-34 [PMID: 22325196]
  11. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Jun;31(3):592-607 [PMID: 15982133]
  12. J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 16;31(7):2488-92 [PMID: 21325516]
  13. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Feb;8(2):143-4 [PMID: 15643428]
  14. J Physiol. 1961 Dec;159:203-21 [PMID: 13883391]
  15. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1019-25 [PMID: 10526343]
  16. J Neurosci. 2006 Dec 13;26(50):13025-36 [PMID: 17167092]
  17. Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):63-71 [PMID: 23228938]
  18. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Dec;11(12):1439-45 [PMID: 18978780]
  19. J Vis. 2016;16(3):15 [PMID: 26885627]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0peripheralfovealobjectsfeedbackdistractorregioncentralvisioninformationconfluencefoveadiscriminationpresentedcorticalconsistentphenomenoneffectSOAstargetsperipheryvisualperceptionVisualspaceretinotopicallymappedprocessedoutsiderepresentsDespitewell-knownfactneuroimagingstudiesfoundrepresentingbehaviorallyrelevant:disruptingusingtranscranialmagneticstimulationimpairstime-pointsdisruptionreceivesboostbehavioralconsequencestesteddistractorsdifferentstimulusonsetasynchroniesParticipantsperformedtasktargetfixatingcentrally~100mspresentationdisruptedperformancespecifictimepointresultsclaimretinotopiccortexrecruitedextra-fovealstudydescribesnewparadigminvestigatingnaturedemonstratesimportanceDisruptionFovealSpaceImpairsDiscriminationPeripheralObjects

Similar Articles

Cited By