Validation and Application of a Dried Blood Spot Assay for Biofilm-Active Antibiotics Commonly Used for Treatment of Prosthetic Implant Infections.

Ben Knippenberg, Madhu Page-Sharp, Sam Salman, Ben Clark, John Dyer, Kevin T Batty, Timothy M E Davis, Laurens Manning
Author Information
  1. Ben Knippenberg: Department of Infectious Diseases, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
  2. Madhu Page-Sharp: School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
  3. Sam Salman: School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia. ORCID
  4. Ben Clark: Department of Infectious Diseases, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
  5. John Dyer: Department of Infectious Diseases, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
  6. Kevin T Batty: School of Pharmacy, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
  7. Timothy M E Davis: School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Fremantle Hospital, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia.
  8. Laurens Manning: School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Harry Perkins Research Institute, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia laurens.manning@uwa.edu.au.

Abstract

Dried blood spot (DBS) antibiotic assays can facilitate pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) studies in situations where venous blood sampling is logistically difficult. We sought to develop, validate, and apply a DBS assay for rifampin (RIF), fusidic acid (FUS), and ciprofloxacin (CIP). These antibiotics are considered active against organisms in biofilms and are therefore commonly used for the treatment of infections associated with prosthetic implants. A liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy DBS assay was developed and validated, including red cell partitioning and thermal stability for each drug and the rifampin metabolite desacetyl rifampin (Des-RIF). Plasma and DBS concentrations in 10 healthy adults were compared, and the concentration-time profiles were incorporated into population PK models. The limits of quantification for RIF, Des-RIF, CIP, and FUS in DBS were 15 μg/liter, 14 μg/liter, 25 μg/liter, and 153 μg/liter, respectively. Adjusting for hematocrit, red cell partitioning, and relative recovery, DBS-predicted plasma concentrations were comparable to measured plasma concentrations for each antibiotic (r > 0.95; P < 0.0001), and Bland-Altman plots showed no significant bias. The final population PK estimates of clearance, volume of distribution, and time above threshold MICs for measured and DBS-predicted plasma concentrations were comparable. These drugs were stable in DBSs for at least 10 days at room temperature and 1 month at 4°C. The present DBS antibiotic assays are robust and can be used as surrogates for plasma concentrations to provide valid PK and PK/PD data in a variety of clinical situations, including therapeutic drug monitoring or studies of implant infections.

References

  1. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 May;69(5):1339-49 [PMID: 24486870]
  2. J Infect Dis. 2013 Nov 1;208(9):1464-73 [PMID: 23901086]
  3. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Oct 1;43(7):848-54 [PMID: 16941365]
  4. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2009;24(1):25-36 [PMID: 19252334]
  5. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008 Jun;52(6):2138-48 [PMID: 18391026]
  6. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1999 Aug;51(8):887-90 [PMID: 10504025]
  7. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008 Dec 15;48(5):1392-6 [PMID: 18980824]
  8. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2007 Oct;34(5):711-26 [PMID: 17653836]
  9. Talanta. 2014 Apr;121:9-17 [PMID: 24607103]
  10. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Jun;13(6):586-91 [PMID: 17331125]
  11. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Oct;58(10):5784-94 [PMID: 25049242]
  12. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Oct 05;60(1):14-23 [PMID: 26438505]
  13. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Dec;37(12):2522-6 [PMID: 8109913]
  14. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2003 Jul 5;791(1-2):93-101 [PMID: 12798169]
  15. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Dec;41(12):2670-9 [PMID: 9420037]
  16. J Infect Dis. 2011 Dec 15;204(12):1951-9 [PMID: 22021624]
  17. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jan 1;44(1):79-86 [PMID: 17143821]
  18. Anal Chem. 2003 Jul 1;75(13):3019-30 [PMID: 12964746]
  19. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Feb;38(1):56-61 [PMID: 23167603]
  20. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2008 May 15;867(2):205-12 [PMID: 18456582]
  21. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2001 Apr;14(2):165-72 [PMID: 11979128]
  22. Rev Infect Dis. 1983 Jul-Aug;5 Suppl 3:S428-32 [PMID: 6356276]
  23. AAPS J. 2009 Jun;11(2):371-80 [PMID: 19452283]
  24. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Dec;70(12):3298-306 [PMID: 26342028]
  25. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2011 Jan 5;54(1):192-7 [PMID: 20708364]
  26. Pediatrics. 2011 Feb;127(2):e367-74 [PMID: 21220396]
  27. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2011 May 1;879(15-16):1063-70 [PMID: 21459055]
  28. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Jun;56(6):3288-97 [PMID: 22470119]
  29. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012 Mar 5;61:108-13 [PMID: 22226041]
  30. Drug Resist Updat. 2011 Apr;14(2):107-17 [PMID: 21440486]
  31. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Sep 15;45(6):753-60 [PMID: 17712761]

MeSH Term

Adult
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Biofilms
Biological Assay
Chromatography, Liquid
Ciprofloxacin
Dried Blood Spot Testing
Drug Monitoring
Female
Fusidic Acid
Hematocrit
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prostheses and Implants
Prosthesis-Related Infections
Reproducibility of Results
Rifampin
Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Fusidic Acid
Ciprofloxacin
Rifampin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DBSconcentrationsPKμg/literplasmaantibioticrifampinDriedbloodassayscanstudiessituationsassayRIFFUSCIPusedinfectionsincludingredcellpartitioningdrugDes-RIF10populationDBS-predictedcomparablemeasured0spotfacilitatepharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamicPDvenoussamplinglogisticallydifficultsoughtdevelopvalidateapplyfusidicacidciprofloxacinantibioticsconsideredactiveorganismsbiofilmsthereforecommonlytreatmentassociatedprostheticimplantsliquidchromatography-massspectroscopydevelopedvalidatedthermalstabilitymetabolitedesacetylPlasmahealthyadultscomparedconcentration-timeprofilesincorporatedmodelslimitsquantification151425153respectivelyAdjustinghematocritrelativerecoveryr>95P<0001Bland-AltmanplotsshowedsignificantbiasfinalestimatesclearancevolumedistributiontimethresholdMICsdrugsstableDBSsleastdaysroomtemperature1month4°CpresentrobustsurrogatesprovidevalidPK/PDdatavarietyclinicaltherapeuticmonitoringimplantValidationApplicationBloodSpotAssayBiofilm-ActiveAntibioticsCommonlyUsedTreatmentProstheticImplantInfections

Similar Articles

Cited By