Measuring medical students' empathy using direct verbal expressions.

Yera Hur, A Ra Cho, Sun Kim
Author Information
  1. Yera Hur: Department of Medical Education, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea. ORCID
  2. A Ra Cho: Department of Medical Education, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ORCID
  3. Sun Kim: Department of Medical Education, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ORCID

Abstract

PURPOSE: Empathy is an important trait in physicians and a key element in the physician-patient relationship. Accordingly, one of the goals in medical education is developing empathy in students. We attempted to practically assess medical students' empathy through their direct verbal expressions.
METHODS: The medical students' empathy was measured using the modified Pencil-and-Paper Empathy Rating Test by Winefield and Chur-Hansen (2001). The students took 15 minutes or so to complete the scale, and it was then scored by one of two trained evaluators (0 to 4 points for each item, for a total score of 40). The subjects were 605 medical students, and the data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, independent t-test, and one-way analysis of variance in SPSS version 21.0.
RESULTS: The students' empathy scores were low (mean, 12.13; standard deviation, 2.55); their most common responses (78.6%) registered as non-empathetic. Differences in empathy were observed by gender (female students>male students; t=-5.068, p<0.001), school system (medical school>medical college; t=-1.935, p=0.053), and academic level (pre-medical 1 year < other years; t=-4.050, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our findings lead us to the significant conclusion that there is the need for empathy enhancement training programs with practical content.

Keywords

References

  1. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Nov;98 (11):1320-8 [PMID: 26032908]
  2. J Med Pract Manage. 2007 Mar-Apr;22(5):255-61 [PMID: 17494478]
  3. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun 27;:null [PMID: 26149966]
  4. Korean J Med Educ. 2015 Dec;27(4):283-90 [PMID: 26657550]
  5. Acad Med. 2011 Mar;86(3):359-64 [PMID: 21248604]
  6. Can J Surg. 2014 Aug;57(4):230-6 [PMID: 25078926]
  7. Acad Med. 2012 Sep;87(9):1243-9 [PMID: 22836852]
  8. Korean J Med Educ. 2014 Sep;26(3):217-21 [PMID: 25805264]
  9. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):524-30 [PMID: 16704404]
  10. Med Teach. 2015;37(6):566-71 [PMID: 25189277]
  11. Korean J Med Educ. 2013 Dec;25(4):289-97 [PMID: 25804963]
  12. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Jun 22;14:122 [PMID: 24952736]
  13. Med Teach. 2015;37(10):943-8 [PMID: 25182523]
  14. Korean J Med Educ. 2009 Jun;21(2):117-24 [PMID: 25813109]
  15. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Feb;99(2):220-6 [PMID: 26395313]
  16. Med Educ. 2002 Jun;36(6):522-7 [PMID: 12047665]
  17. Med Educ. 2000 Feb;34(2):90-4 [PMID: 10652060]
  18. BMC Med Educ. 2012 Dec 17;12:122 [PMID: 23245328]
  19. Med Princ Pract. 2015;24(4):344-50 [PMID: 25924560]

MeSH Term

Curriculum
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Educational Measurement
Empathy
Female
Goals
Humans
Male
Physician-Patient Relations
Psychometrics
Sex Factors
Speech
Students, Medical
Teaching

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0empathymedicalstudentsstudents'Empathyusingoneeducationdirectverbalexpressions0analysisp<0001PURPOSE:importanttraitphysicianskeyelementphysician-patientrelationshipAccordinglygoalsdevelopingattemptedpracticallyassessMETHODS:measuredmodifiedPencil-and-PaperRatingTestWinefieldChur-Hansen2001took15minutescompletescalescoredtwotrainedevaluators4pointsitemtotalscore40subjects605dataanalyzeddescriptiveindependentt-testone-wayvarianceSPSSversion21RESULTS:scoreslowmean1213standarddeviation255commonresponses786%registerednon-empatheticDifferencesobservedgenderfemalestudents>malet=-5068schoolsystemschool>medicalcolleget=-1935p=0053academiclevelpre-medical1year<yearst=-4050CONCLUSION:findingsleadussignificantconclusionneedenhancementtrainingprogramspracticalcontentMeasuringCommunicationskillsMedicalPhysician-patientrelationsProfessionalism

Similar Articles

Cited By