Thematic knowledge, artifact concepts, and the left posterior temporal lobe: Where action and object semantics converge.

Solène Kalénine, Laurel J Buxbaum
Author Information
  1. Solène Kalénine: Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA; Univ. Lille, CNRS, CHU Lille, UMR 9193 SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, Lille, France. Electronic address: solene.kalenine@univ-lille3.fr.
  2. Laurel J Buxbaum: Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.

Abstract

Converging evidence supports the existence of functionally and neuroanatomically distinct taxonomic (similarity-based; e.g., hammer-screwdriver) and thematic (event-based; e.g., hammer-nail) semantic systems. Processing of thematic relations between objects has been shown to selectively recruit the left posterior temporoparietal cortex. Similar posterior regions have also been shown to be critical for knowledge of relationships between actions and manipulable human-made objects (artifacts). Based on the hypothesis that thematic relationships for artifacts rely, at least in part, on action relationships, we assessed the prediction that the same regions of the left posterior temporoparietal cortex would be critical for conceptual processing of artifact-related actions and thematic relations for artifacts. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated processing of taxonomic and thematic relations for artifacts and natural objects as well as artifact action knowledge (gesture recognition) abilities in a large sample of 48 stroke patients with a range of lesion foci in the left hemisphere. Like control participants, patients identified thematic relations faster than taxonomic relations for artifacts, whereas they identified taxonomic relations faster than thematic relations for natural objects. Moreover, response times (RTs) for identifying thematic relations for artifacts selectively predicted performance in gesture recognition. Whole brain Voxel-based Lesion-Symptom Mapping (VLSM) analyses and Region of Interest (ROI) regression analyses further demonstrated that lesions to the left posterior temporal cortex, overlapping with LTO and visual motion area hMT+, were associated both with relatively slower RTs in identifying thematic relations for artifacts and poorer artifact action knowledge in patients. These findings provide novel insights into the functional role of left posterior temporal cortex in thematic knowledge, and suggest that the close association between thematic relations for artifacts and action representations may reflect their common dependence on visual motion and manipulation information.

Keywords

References

  1. Neuroimage. 2003 Feb;18(2):542-57 [PMID: 12595206]
  2. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jul;22(7):1597-613 [PMID: 19580383]
  3. Neuroimage. 2002 Mar;15(3):675-85 [PMID: 11848710]
  4. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Aug;25(8):1191-205 [PMID: 23574587]
  5. Cereb Cortex. 2016 May;26(5):2018-34 [PMID: 25750259]
  6. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 May;19(5):268-77 [PMID: 25843544]
  7. Phys Life Rev. 2014 Jun;11(2):261-2 [PMID: 24461375]
  8. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jun;19(6):1004-12 [PMID: 17536970]
  9. Brain Lang. 2010 Jul;114(1):16-25 [PMID: 20403632]
  10. Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 15;50(3):1148-67 [PMID: 20056149]
  11. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Jan 1;15(1):30-46 [PMID: 12590841]
  12. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1081-8 [PMID: 17583985]
  13. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Jun 1;5(6):244-252 [PMID: 11390295]
  14. Med Image Anal. 2006 Jun;10(3):397-412 [PMID: 15948659]
  15. Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1349-1357 [PMID: 26511371]
  16. Brain Res. 2009 May 13;1270:78-87 [PMID: 19306848]
  17. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003 May 1;20(3):409-32 [PMID: 20957578]
  18. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Dec;27(12):2491-511 [PMID: 26351989]
  19. Neuropsychologia. 2008 Jan 31;46(2):409-18 [PMID: 17920085]
  20. J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):40-9 [PMID: 18479891]
  21. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 18;8:140 [PMID: 24672461]
  22. Cortex. 2007 Apr;43(3):461-8 [PMID: 17533768]
  23. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 May;23(5):1263-73 [PMID: 20350178]
  24. Brain. 2010 Nov;133(11):3269-80 [PMID: 20805101]
  25. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:54-62 [PMID: 25234647]
  26. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 Nov-Dec;6(6):483-90 [PMID: 26352170]
  27. Neuropsychologia. 2010 May;48(6):1583-97 [PMID: 20144630]
  28. Front Psychol. 2014 May 26;5:494 [PMID: 24904506]
  29. Brain Lang. 2013 Apr;125(1):94-105 [PMID: 23454619]
  30. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Nov;25(11):4319-33 [PMID: 25636912]
  31. Cereb Cortex. 2002 May;12(5):545-51 [PMID: 11950772]
  32. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1274-95 [PMID: 22449134]
  33. Brain Lang. 2004 Jun;89(3):417-32 [PMID: 15120534]
  34. Neuroimage. 2009 Feb 1;44(3):1152-62 [PMID: 18977304]
  35. Anal Verbal Behav. 2003;19:55-89 [PMID: 22477256]
  36. Brain Res. 2008 Jul 7;1218:194-205 [PMID: 18514168]
  37. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 05;8:591 [PMID: 25140142]
  38. Cortex. 2013 Sep;49(8):2097-105 [PMID: 23313011]
  39. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 May 04;6:106 [PMID: 22586383]
  40. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8520-4 [PMID: 21540329]
  41. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Sep;86(9):1807-14 [PMID: 16181947]
  42. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011 Sep-Oct;53(2):206-9 [PMID: 21035202]
  43. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 30;8:344 [PMID: 24910603]
  44. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998 Mar-Apr;22(2):324-33 [PMID: 9530404]
  45. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):601-9 [PMID: 22201413]
  46. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):131-42 [PMID: 22642711]
  47. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Jan;53:221-32 [PMID: 24316142]
  48. Neuroscientist. 2006 Jun;12(3):211-31 [PMID: 16684967]
  49. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:176-89 [PMID: 25582406]
  50. Neuropsychologia. 2015 May;71:28-37 [PMID: 25725356]
  51. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Jul 1;14(5):795-805 [PMID: 12167263]
  52. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):226-39 [PMID: 15996857]
  53. Cognition. 1989 Nov;33(1-2):25-62 [PMID: 2691184]
  54. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2767-96 [PMID: 19329570]
  55. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1542-55 [PMID: 17714015]
  56. Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 24;5:636 [PMID: 25009519]
  57. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Jun;132(2):163-201 [PMID: 12825636]
  58. J Neurophysiol. 2012 Mar;107(5):1443-56 [PMID: 22131379]
  59. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(8):1990-7 [PMID: 22571932]
  60. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):48-55 [PMID: 10769305]
  61. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Mar;130(1):3-28 [PMID: 11293459]
  62. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991 Dec;120(4):339-57 [PMID: 1837294]

Grants

  1. R01 NS065049/NINDS NIH HHS
  2. R01 NS099061/NINDS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Concept Formation
Female
Humans
Knowledge
Male
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Reaction Time
Stroke
Temporal Lobe

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0thematicrelationsartifactsposteriorknowledgeleftcortexactiontaxonomicobjectstemporalrelationshipsartifactpatientsegshownselectivelytemporoparietalregionscriticalactionshypothesisprocessingnaturalgesturerecognitionidentifiedfasterRTsidentifyingVoxel-basedanalysesvisualmotionThematicconceptsConvergingevidencesupportsexistencefunctionallyneuroanatomicallydistinctsimilarity-basedhammer-screwdriverevent-basedhammer-nailsemanticsystemsProcessingrecruitSimilaralsomanipulablehuman-madeBasedrelyleastpartassessedpredictionconceptualartifact-relatedtestevaluatedwellabilitieslargesample48strokerangelesionfocihemisphereLikecontrolparticipantswhereasMoreoverresponsetimespredictedperformanceWholebrainLesion-SymptomMappingVLSMRegionInterestROIregressiondemonstratedlesionsoverlappingLTOareahMT+associatedrelativelyslowerpoorerfindingsprovidenovelinsightsfunctionalrolesuggestcloseassociationrepresentationsmayreflectcommondependencemanipulationinformationlobe:objectsemanticsconvergeActionArtifactLeftlesion-symptommapping

Similar Articles

Cited By