Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in nonagenarians compared with younger patients in a multicenter cohort.

Muhib A Khan, Grayson L Baird, David Miller, Anand Patel, Shawn Tsekhan, Shadi Yaghi, Ajit Puri, Mahesh Jayaraman, Nils Henninger, Brian Silver
Author Information
  1. Muhib A Khan: Department of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  2. Grayson L Baird: Lifespan Biostatistics Core, Lifespan Hospital System, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. ORCID
  3. David Miller: Department of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. ORCID
  4. Anand Patel: Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
  5. Shawn Tsekhan: Department of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  6. Shadi Yaghi: Department of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  7. Ajit Puri: Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
  8. Mahesh Jayaraman: Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
  9. Nils Henninger: Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
  10. Brian Silver: Department of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated the superiority of endovascular therapy (EVT) for emergent large vessel occlusion.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of EVT in nonagenarians, for whom data are limited.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and imaging data of all patients who underwent EVT at two stroke centers between January 2012 and August 2014. The 90-day functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score) was compared between younger patients (age 18-89 years; n=175) and nonagenarians (n=18). The relationship between pre-stroke and 90-day post-stroke mRS was analyzed in these two groups. Multivariable analysis of age, recanalization grade, and admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) for predicting outcome was performed.
RESULTS: Age ≥90 years was associated with a poor (mRS >2) 90-day outcome relative to those under 90 (89% vs 52%, OR=8, 95% CI 1.7 to 35.0; p=0.0081). Nonagenarians had a higher pre-stroke mRS score (0.77; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.30) than younger patients (0.24; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.35; p=0.005). No difference was observed between nonagenarians and younger patients in the rate of mRS change from pre-stroke to 90 days (p=0.540). On multivariable regression, age (OR=1.05, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.08; p<0.0001), recanalization grade (OR=0.62 95% CI 0.42 to 0.91; p=0.015), and admission NIHSS (OR=1.07 95% CI 1.02 to 1.13; p=0.01) were associated with a poor 90-day outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonagenarians are at a substantially higher risk of a poor 90-day outcome after EVT than younger patients. However, a small subset of nonagenarians may benefit from EVT, particularly if they have a good pre-stroke functional status. Further research is needed to identify factors associated with favorable outcome in this age cohort.

Keywords

References

  1. Age Ageing. 2004 Mar;33(2):149-54 [PMID: 14960430]
  2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(11):2070-5 [PMID: 24994827]
  3. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3):723-30 [PMID: 10987591]
  4. Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35-41 [PMID: 7678184]
  5. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jun;33(6):1167-9 [PMID: 22300926]
  6. J Neurol Sci. 2015 Dec 15;359(1-2):418-23 [PMID: 26476774]
  7. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):638-42 [PMID: 22116109]
  8. Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31 [PMID: 26898852]
  9. Aging Ment Health. 2017 Aug;21(8):805-809 [PMID: 26979293]
  10. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2285-95 [PMID: 25882376]
  11. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18 [PMID: 25671797]
  12. Neuroradiology. 2013 Aug;55(8):977-987 [PMID: 23644538]
  13. Stroke. 2011 Jul;42(7):1967-70 [PMID: 21597014]
  14. Circulation. 2014 Oct 7;130(15):1236-44 [PMID: 25208551]
  15. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 May;7(5):316-21 [PMID: 25765949]
  16. Postgrad Med J. 2012 Feb;88(1036):79-87 [PMID: 22184252]
  17. JAMA Neurol. 2015 Oct;72(10):1101-3 [PMID: 26237199]
  18. Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37 [PMID: 12869717]
  19. Arch Neurol. 2010 May;67(5):559-63 [PMID: 20212195]
  20. J Neuroimaging. 2009 Apr;19(2):158-63 [PMID: 18800998]
  21. Eur Heart J. 2015 Sep 14;36(35):2373-80 [PMID: 26071599]
  22. Stroke. 2014 Mar;45(3):770-5 [PMID: 24496395]
  23. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Jun;30(6):1184-9 [PMID: 19342542]
  24. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):11-20 [PMID: 25517348]
  25. Stroke. 2008 Aug;39(8):2249-56 [PMID: 18535273]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30 [PMID: 25671798]
  27. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 15;98(10):1334-9 [PMID: 17134624]
  28. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306 [PMID: 25882510]
  29. J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Mar;21(3):401-5 [PMID: 24161340]
  30. J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Aug;21(8):1344-8 [PMID: 24642025]
  31. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008 Sep;17(5):266-72 [PMID: 18755405]
  32. Int J Stroke. 2014 Apr;9(3):308-12 [PMID: 23981475]
  33. JAMA. 1995 Oct 4;274(13):1017-25 [PMID: 7563451]
  34. Gerontologist. 1997 Dec;37(6):729-36 [PMID: 9432989]
  35. Alzheimers Dement. 2008 Jan;4(1 Suppl 1):S56-9 [PMID: 18632002]
  36. Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29-322 [PMID: 25520374]
  37. Stroke. 2010 Aug;41(8):1833-5 [PMID: 20576948]
  38. Stroke. 2007 Mar;38(3):967-73 [PMID: 17272772]
  39. CMAJ. 2003 Aug 5;169(3):193-7 [PMID: 12900476]
  40. Med Care. 2000 Oct;38(10):1051-7 [PMID: 11021678]
  41. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012 May;67(5):470-9 [PMID: 22499766]

Grants

  1. K08 NS091499/NINDS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Ischemia
Cohort Studies
Endovascular Procedures
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Stroke
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00patientsoutcome95%CI1EVTnonagenarians90-daymRSyoungerp=0agepre-strokeassociatedpoordatatwostrokefunctionalScalescorecomparedrecanalizationgradeadmissionStrokeNIHSS35NonagenarianshigherOR=1cohortBACKGROUND:RecentstudiesdemonstratedsuperiorityendovasculartherapyemergentlargevesselocclusionOBJECTIVE:determineeffectivenesslimitedMETHODS:retrospectivelyreviewedclinicalimagingunderwentcentersJanuary2012August2014modifiedRankin18-89 yearsn=175n=18relationshippost-strokeanalyzedgroupsMultivariableanalysisNationalInstitutesHealthpredictingperformedRESULTS:Age≥90 years>2relative9089%vs52%OR=8700817744302417005differenceobservedratechange90 days540multivariableregression050308p<00001OR=062429101507021301CONCLUSIONS:substantiallyriskHoweversmallsubsetmaybenefitparticularlygoodstatusresearchneededidentifyfactorsfavorableEndovasculartreatmentacuteischemicmulticenterAngiographyInterventionThrombectomy

Similar Articles

Cited By