The Cost-Effectiveness of Anemia Treatment for Persons with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Benjamin O Yarnoff, Thomas J Hoerger, Siobhan A Simpson, Meda E Pavkov, Nilka R Burrows, Sundar S Shrestha, Desmond E Williams, Xiaohui Zhuo
Author Information
  1. Benjamin O Yarnoff: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
  2. Thomas J Hoerger: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
  3. Siobhan A Simpson: RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
  4. Meda E Pavkov: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  5. Nilka R Burrows: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  6. Sundar S Shrestha: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  7. Desmond E Williams: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
  8. Xiaohui Zhuo: Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although major guidelines uniformly recommend iron supplementation and erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESAs) for managing chronic anemia in persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD), there are differences in the recommended hemoglobin (Hb) treatment target and no guidelines consider the costs or cost-effectiveness of treatment. In this study, we explored the most cost-effective Hb target for anemia treatment in persons with CKD stages 3-4.
METHODS AND FINDINGS: The CKD Health Policy Model was populated with a synthetic cohort of persons over age 30 with prevalent CKD stages 3-4 (i.e., not on dialysis) and anemia created from the 1999-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), computed as incremental cost divided by incremental quality adjusted life years (QALYs), were assessed for Hb targets of 10 g/dl to 13 g/dl at 0.5 g/dl increments. Targeting a Hb of 10 g/dl resulted in an ICER of $32,111 compared with no treatment and targeting a Hb of 10.5 g/dl resulted in an ICER of $32,475 compared with a Hb target of 10 g/dl. QALYs increased to 4.63 for a Hb target of 10 g/dl and to 4.75 for a target of 10.5 g/dl or 11 g/dl. Any treatment target above 11 g/dl increased medical costs and decreased QALYs.
CONCLUSIONS: In persons over age 30 with CKD stages 3-4, anemia treatment is most cost-effective when targeting a Hb level of 10.5 g/dl. This study provides important information for framing guidelines related to treatment of anemia in persons with CKD.

References

  1. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001 Jan;37(1 Suppl 2):S66-70 [PMID: 11158865]
  2. JAMA. 2003 Dec 17;290(23):3101-14 [PMID: 14679273]
  3. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jun 24;162(12):1401-8 [PMID: 12076240]
  4. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Dec;23(12):2035-41 [PMID: 23204444]
  5. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Mar;55(3):463-73 [PMID: 20116910]
  6. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008 Apr;8(2):165-78 [PMID: 20528406]
  7. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Nov;16(11):3403-10 [PMID: 16162813]
  8. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Dec;56(6):1050-61 [PMID: 20932621]
  9. Kidney Int. 2003 Jul;64(1):295-304 [PMID: 12787422]
  10. Am J Surg. 1996 Mar;171(3):324-30 [PMID: 8615466]
  11. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2085-98 [PMID: 17108343]
  12. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Apr;5(4):667-72 [PMID: 20299366]
  13. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Mar;55(3):452-62 [PMID: 20116911]
  14. Am J Hematol. 2010 May;85(5):315-9 [PMID: 20201089]
  15. Blood Purif. 2013;36(1):29-36 [PMID: 23735569]
  16. Med Decis Making. 1993 Apr-Jun;13(2):161-5 [PMID: 8483401]
  17. JAMA. 1996 Oct 16;276(15):1253-8 [PMID: 8849754]
  18. N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 27;339(9):584-90 [PMID: 9718377]
  19. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Jan;61(1):44-56 [PMID: 22921639]
  20. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Feb;24(2):348-54 [PMID: 19037082]
  21. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Jan;4(1):33-8 [PMID: 18987300]
  22. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 19;361(21):2019-32 [PMID: 19880844]
  23. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Mar;65(3):403-11 [PMID: 25468386]
  24. Value Health. 2008 Dec;11(7):1131-43 [PMID: 18489495]
  25. Kidney Int. 2009 Jan;75(1):15-24 [PMID: 18813284]
  26. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 6;153(1):23-33 [PMID: 20439566]
  27. Med Decis Making. 2007 Mar-Apr;27(2):161-77 [PMID: 17409366]
  28. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2010 Sep;19(5):420-4 [PMID: 20689425]
  29. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2071-84 [PMID: 17108342]
  30. Circulation. 2011 Dec 20;124(25):2903-8 [PMID: 22104547]

MeSH Term

Adult
Anemia
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Hemoglobins
Humans
Molecular Targeted Therapy
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Chemicals

Hemoglobins

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0g/dlHbtreatment10CKDtargetanemiapersons5guidelinesstages3-4QALYschroniccostscost-effectivenessstudycost-effectiveHealthage30incrementalresultedICER$32comparedtargetingincreased411BACKGROUND:AlthoughmajoruniformlyrecommendironsupplementationerythropoietinstimulatingagentsESAsmanagingkidneydiseasedifferencesrecommendedhemoglobinconsiderexploredMETHODSANDFINDINGS:PolicyModelpopulatedsyntheticcohortprevalentiedialysiscreated1999-2010NationalNutritionExaminationSurveyIncrementalratiosICERscomputedcostdividedqualityadjustedlifeyearsassessedtargets130incrementsTargeting1114756375medicaldecreasedCONCLUSIONS:levelprovidesimportantinformationframingrelatedCost-EffectivenessAnemiaTreatmentPersonsChronicKidneyDisease

Similar Articles

Cited By