Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses of hospital-based home care compared to hospital-based care for children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes; a randomised controlled trial; results after two years' follow-up.

Irén Tiberg, Björn Lindgren, Annelie Carlsson, Inger Hallström
Author Information
  1. Irén Tiberg: Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden. iren.tiberg@med.lu.se. ORCID
  2. Björn Lindgren: Department of Health Sciences, Lund Universit, Lund, Sweden.
  3. Annelie Carlsson: Department of Paediatrics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
  4. Inger Hallström: Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Practices regarding hospitalisation of children at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes vary both within countries and internationally, and high-quality evidence of best practice is scarce. The objective of this study was to close some of the gaps in evidence by comparing two alternative regimens for children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes: hospital-based care and hospital-based home care (HBHC), referring to specialist care in a home-based setting.
METHODS: A randomised controlled trial, including 60 children aged 3-15 years, took place at a university hospital in Sweden. When the children were medically stable, they were randomised to either the traditional, hospital-based care or to HBHC.
RESULTS: Two years after diagnosis there were no differences in HbA1c (p = 0.777), in episodes of severe hypoglycaemia (p = 0.167), or in insulin U/kg/24 h (p = 0.269). Over 24 months, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in how parents' reported the impact of paediatric chronic health condition on family (p = 0.138) or in parents' self-reported health-related quality of life (p = 0.067). However, there was a statistically significant difference regarding healthcare satisfaction, favouring HBHC (p = 0.002). In total, healthcare costs (direct costs) were significantly lower in the HBHC group but no statistically significant difference between the two groups in estimated lost production (indirect costs) for the family as a whole. Whereas mothers had a significantly lower value of lost production, when their children were treated within the HBHC regime, fathers had a higher, but not a significantly higher value. The results indicate that HBHC might be a cost-effective strategy in a healthcare sector perspective. When using the wider societal perspective, no difference in cost effectiveness or cost utility was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there are only a few, well-designed and controlled studies that compare hospital care to different models of home care. The results of this study provide empirical support for the safety and feasibility of HBHC when a child is diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Our results further indicate that the model of care may have an impact on families' daily living, not only during the initial period of care but for a longer period of time.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov with identity number NCT00804232 , December 2008.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT00804232

References

  1. Diabetes Care. 1992 Jan;15(1):95-100 [PMID: 1737548]
  2. Open Nurs J. 2011;5:111-9 [PMID: 22371819]
  3. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1105-13 [PMID: 9817128]
  4. Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 Nov;12(7):619-26 [PMID: 21435135]
  5. Diabetes Care. 2008 Mar;31(3):596-615 [PMID: 18308683]
  6. Diabetes. 2011 Feb;60(2):577-81 [PMID: 21270269]
  7. J Health Econ. 2002 Mar;21(2):271-92 [PMID: 11939242]
  8. Diabet Med. 2011 Sep;28(9):1103-8 [PMID: 21418092]
  9. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):367-74 [PMID: 25444294]
  10. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):375-82 [PMID: 25444295]
  11. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD004099 [PMID: 17443539]
  12. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009 Sep;10 Suppl 12:3-12 [PMID: 19754613]
  13. Diabetologia. 2010 Jun;53(6):1084-92 [PMID: 20020097]
  14. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2004 Feb;25(1):10-20 [PMID: 14767351]
  15. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(10):1349-58 [PMID: 8560302]
  16. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Sep 27;2:55 [PMID: 15450120]
  17. J Adv Nurs. 2005 May;50(3):253-61 [PMID: 15811104]
  18. Diabetes Educ. 1999 Nov-Dec;25(6):895-906 [PMID: 10711071]
  19. Med Care. 2004 Sep;42(9):851-9 [PMID: 15319610]
  20. Lancet. 1991 Mar 16;337(8742):656-60 [PMID: 1672001]
  21. Diabet Med. 2004 Jun;21(6):531-8 [PMID: 15154935]
  22. J Fam Nurs. 2006 Nov;12(4):368-89 [PMID: 17099116]
  23. Br J Nurs. 1999 Feb 11-24;8(3):133-9 [PMID: 10222874]
  24. BMJ. 1993 Jul 10;307(6896):96-8 [PMID: 8343736]
  25. BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Nov 09;16(1):76 [PMID: 26553304]
  26. J Fam Nurs. 2013 May;19(2):249-73 [PMID: 23539561]
  27. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012 Dec;13(8):625-31 [PMID: 22759218]
  28. Nurs Res. 2007 Jul-Aug;56(4 Suppl):S78-85 [PMID: 17625479]
  29. BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655 [PMID: 18824488]
  30. Diabet Med. 2006 Aug;23(8):821-9 [PMID: 16911617]
  31. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;115(5):1063-70 [PMID: 20410783]
  32. Diabet Med. 2006 Aug;23(8):857-66 [PMID: 16911623]
  33. BMC Pediatr. 2012 Oct 20;12:165 [PMID: 23083125]
  34. Acta Paediatr. 2012 Oct;101(10):1069-73 [PMID: 22759081]
  35. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1095-103 [PMID: 9817127]
  36. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(7):358-9, 355-7 [PMID: 25444292]
  37. Res Nurs Health. 1999 Jun;22(3):203-16 [PMID: 10344701]
  38. Diabet Med. 2009 Sep;26(9):928-34 [PMID: 19719715]
  39. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014 Mar;15(2):135-41 [PMID: 24033852]
  40. BMJ. 1996 Aug 3;313(7052):275-83 [PMID: 8704542]
  41. Qual Health Res. 2016 Aug;26(10):1331-40 [PMID: 25762706]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Child
Child, Preschool
Cost of Illness
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Care Costs
Home Care Services
Hospitalization
Humans
Male
Quality of Life
Sweden
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0careHBHCchildrenp=0hospital-basedtype1costsresultsdiabetestwodiagnosedhomerandomisedcontrolledstatisticallysignificantdifferencehealthcaresignificantlyregardingdiagnosiswithinevidencestudytrialyearshospitaldifferencesgroupsparents'impactfamilylifelowerlostproductionindirectvaluehigherindicateperspectivecostperiodCost-effectivenessBACKGROUND:Practiceshospitalisationvarycountriesinternationallyhigh-qualitybestpracticescarceobjectiveclosegapscomparingalternativeregimensdiabetes:referringspecialisthome-basedsettingMETHODS:including60aged3-15tookplaceuniversitySwedenmedicallystableeithertraditionalRESULTS:TwoHbA1c777episodesseverehypoglycaemia167insulinU/kg/24h26924monthsreportedpaediatricchronichealthcondition138self-reportedhealth-relatedquality067Howeversatisfactionfavouring002totaldirectgroupestimatedwholeWhereasmotherstreatedregimefathersmightcost-effectivestrategysectorusingwidersocietaleffectivenessutilityfoundCONCLUSIONS:Overallwell-designedstudiescomparedifferentmodelsprovideempiricalsupportsafetyfeasibilitychildmodelmayfamilies'dailylivinginitiallongertimeTRIALREGISTRATION:ClinicalTrialsgovidentitynumberNCT00804232December2008cost-utilityanalysescomparedyears'follow-upCost-utilityDirectMetaboliccontrolQuality

Similar Articles

Cited By