The impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings: Systematic review of longitudinal observational studies.

Seth M Noar, Diane B Francis, Christy Bridges, Jennah M Sontag, Kurt M Ribisl, Noel T Brewer
Author Information
  1. Seth M Noar: School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. Electronic address: noar@email.unc.edu.
  2. Diane B Francis: School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
  3. Christy Bridges: Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
  4. Jennah M Sontag: School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
  5. Kurt M Ribisl: Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
  6. Noel T Brewer: Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cigarette pack warnings are a tobacco control strategy used globally. To understand their impact, we systematically reviewed longitudinal observational studies examining national implementation of strengthened warnings.
METHODS: We used comprehensive search procedures to identify observational studies examining the impact of strengthening cigarette pack warnings. We report longitudinal changes in knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behavior.
RESULTS: We identified 32 studies conducted in 20 countries with 812,363 participants. Studies commonly examined changes from text to pictorial warnings (64%); the remainder examined strengthened text or strengthened pictorial warnings. Knowledge increased in all 12 studies that assessed it. Studies of beliefs/attitudes and intentions showed mixed results. Quitline calls increased in four of six studies, while foregoing of cigarettes did not increase. Cigarette consumption decreased in three of eight studies; quit attempts increased in four of seven studies; and short-term cessation increased in two of three studies. Smoking prevalence decreased in six of nine studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening warnings was associated with longitudinal increases in knowledge, quitline calls and reductions in smoking behavior. Strengthening warning policies should be a priority for tobacco control globally.

Keywords

References

  1. Health Educ Res. 2015 Feb;30(1):35-45 [PMID: 24848554]
  2. Tob Induc Dis. 2013 Sep 18;11(1):20 [PMID: 24330614]
  3. Tob Control. 2015 Apr;24(Suppl 2):ii33-ii41 [PMID: 28407610]
  4. Tob Control. 2009 Jun;18(3):235-7 [PMID: 19211613]
  5. Addiction. 2009 Apr;104(4):669-75 [PMID: 19215595]
  6. Addiction. 2014 Apr;109(4):653-62 [PMID: 24428427]
  7. Health Psychol. 2014 Nov;33(11):1410-20 [PMID: 24977309]
  8. Am J Public Health. 2015 Mar;105(3):e1 [PMID: 25602876]
  9. J Health Econ. 2015 Jul;42:186-96 [PMID: 25985121]
  10. Tob Control. 2015 Apr;24(Suppl 2):ii26-ii32 [PMID: 28407608]
  11. Am J Public Health. 2014 Oct;104(10):e11-30 [PMID: 25122019]
  12. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Sep;45(3):334-42 [PMID: 23953361]
  13. Expert Syst Appl. 2011 Jun 1;38(6):6430-6438 [PMID: 26560158]
  14. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Oct;12 Suppl:S72-7 [PMID: 20889484]
  15. Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):127-38 [PMID: 22345235]
  16. Tob Control. 2002 Mar;11 Suppl 1:I73-80 [PMID: 11893817]
  17. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Jan;14(1):62-74 [PMID: 22039072]
  18. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 May 27;60(20):645-51 [PMID: 21617629]
  19. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Mar;15(3):708-17 [PMID: 22990228]
  20. Tob Control. 2011 Nov;20(6):412-8 [PMID: 21474501]
  21. Tob Control. 2014 Jan;23(1):e2 [PMID: 23092884]
  22. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jan;86(1):77-83 [PMID: 21482060]
  23. Tob Control. 2011 Sep;20(5):327-37 [PMID: 21606180]
  24. Journal Mass Commun Q. 2017 Jun 01;94(2):416-442 [PMID: 29975497]
  25. Prev Med. 2012 Feb;54(2):162-7 [PMID: 22182479]
  26. Salud Publica Mex. 2012 Jun;54(3):242-53 [PMID: 22689162]
  27. Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;164:141-149 [PMID: 26092600]
  28. Salud Publica Mex. 2012 Jun;54(3):270-80 [PMID: 22689165]
  29. BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 17;11:238 [PMID: 21496314]
  30. Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19(2):168-70 [PMID: 20378594]
  31. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 May 22;58(19):528-9 [PMID: 19478720]
  32. Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):341-54 [PMID: 25948713]
  33. Lancet. 2012 Nov 3;380(9853):1575-82 [PMID: 22981904]
  34. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2 Suppl):S275-89 [PMID: 20117612]
  35. Addiction. 2008 Sep;103(9):1562-71 [PMID: 18783508]
  36. Tob Control. 2014 Mar;23 Suppl 1:i7-12 [PMID: 24218057]
  37. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Apr;91(4):551-8 [PMID: 18556866]

Grants

  1. P30 CA016086/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Intention
Motivation
Product Labeling
Smokers
Smoking Cessation
Tobacco Products
Tobacco Use

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studieswarningslongitudinalincreasedpackimpactobservationalstrengthenedCigarettetobaccocontrolusedgloballyexaminingstrengtheningcigarettechangesknowledgeintentionsbehaviorStudiesexaminedtextpictorialcallsfoursixdecreasedthreeSmokingStrengtheningOBJECTIVES:strategyunderstandsystematicallyreviewednationalimplementationMETHODS:comprehensivesearchproceduresidentifyreportbeliefsattitudesRESULTS:identified32conducted20countries812363participantscommonly64%remainderKnowledge12assessedbeliefs/attitudesshowedmixedresultsQuitlineforegoingcigarettesincreaseconsumptioneightquitattemptssevenshort-termcessationtwoprevalencenineCONCLUSIONS:associatedincreasesquitlinereductionssmokingwarningpoliciesprioritywarnings:SystematicreviewGraphicObservationalPictorialTheoryWarning

Similar Articles

Cited By