Morphological and functional relationships with ultrasound measured muscle thickness of the upper extremity and trunk.

Takashi Abe, Jeremy P Loenneke, Robert S Thiebaud, Mark Loftin
Author Information
  1. Takashi Abe: Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, School of Applied Science, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA.
  2. Jeremy P Loenneke: Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, School of Applied Science, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA.
  3. Robert S Thiebaud: Department of Kinesiology, School of Education, Texas Wesleyan University, Fort Worth, TX 76105, USA.
  4. Mark Loftin: Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, School of Applied Science, The University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA.

Abstract

Unless a subject's muscle is relatively small, a single image from a standard ultrasound can only measure muscle thickness (MT). Thus, it is important to know whether MT is related to morphological and functional characteristics of individual muscles of the extremity and trunk. In this review, we summarize previously published articles in the upper extremity and trunk demonstrating the relationships between ultrasound-measured MT and muscle morphology (cross-sectional area, CSA and muscle volume, MV) and muscular or respiratory function. The linear relationship between MT and muscle CSA or MV has been observed in biceps brachii, triceps brachii, pectoralis major, psoas major, and supraspinatus muscles. Previous studies suggest that MT in the upper arm and trunk may reflect muscle CSA and MV for the individual muscles. Unfortunately, few studies exist regarding the functional relationship with ultrasound MT in the upper extremity and trunk. Future research is needed to investigate these findings further.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001 May;29(4):230-6 [PMID: 11323778]
  2. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Aug;172(4):249-55 [PMID: 11531646]
  3. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Mar;91(2-3):264-72 [PMID: 14569399]
  4. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):116-8 [PMID: 14639480]
  5. J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Feb;19(1):231-40 [PMID: 15705040]
  6. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005 Jun;35(6):346-55 [PMID: 16001906]
  7. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 15;31(6):E175-8 [PMID: 16540858]
  8. Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):161-6 [PMID: 16973400]
  9. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Oct;37(10):608-12 [PMID: 17970407]
  10. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jan;90(1):87-94 [PMID: 19154834]
  11. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):572-8 [PMID: 19264532]
  12. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2009 Nov;29(6):440-6 [PMID: 19747211]
  13. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Jan;108(2):273-9 [PMID: 19777252]
  14. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Mar;108(4):689-94 [PMID: 19904555]
  15. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2010 Sep;30(5):338-43 [PMID: 20618358]
  16. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2010 Nov;30(6):426-31 [PMID: 20812996]
  17. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Jun;111(6):989-95 [PMID: 21082193]
  18. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Oct;43(10):2000-4 [PMID: 21448087]
  19. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011 Aug;41(8):572-80 [PMID: 21654098]
  20. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012 Sep;38(9):1656-61 [PMID: 22749820]
  21. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012 Aug;36(4):488-95 [PMID: 22977774]
  22. Muscle Nerve. 2014 May;49(5):736-40 [PMID: 24038069]
  23. Age (Dordr). 2014 Apr;36(2):813-21 [PMID: 24243442]
  24. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Apr;18(2):266-72 [PMID: 24725796]
  25. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Sep;40(9):2069-75 [PMID: 25023107]
  26. Am J Hum Biol. 1994;6(2):161-170 [PMID: 28548275]
  27. Phys Ther. 1985 Apr;65(4):477-81 [PMID: 3885268]
  28. Int Z Angew Physiol. 1968;26(1):26-32 [PMID: 5700894]
  29. J Physiol. 1983 May;338:37-49 [PMID: 6875963]
  30. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Jun;74(6):2740-4 [PMID: 8365975]
  31. Muscle Nerve. 1993 Mar;16(3):294-300 [PMID: 8446128]
  32. J Physiol. 1996 Oct 1;496 ( Pt 1):287-97 [PMID: 8910216]
  33. Eur Respir J. 1997 Dec;10(12):2861-7 [PMID: 9493674]
  34. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Jul;78(2):109-14 [PMID: 9694308]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0muscleMTtrunkextremityupperultrasoundfunctionalmusclesCSAMVthicknessindividualrelationshipscross-sectionalareavolumerelationshipbrachiimajorstudiesUnlesssubject'srelativelysmallsingleimagestandardcanmeasureThusimportantknowwhetherrelatedmorphologicalcharacteristicsreviewsummarizepreviouslypublishedarticlesdemonstratingultrasound-measuredmorphologymuscularrespiratoryfunctionlinearobservedbicepstricepspectoralispsoassupraspinatusPrevioussuggestarmmayreflectUnfortunatelyexistregardingFutureresearchneededinvestigatefindingsMorphologicalmeasuredUltrasonographyanatomicalprediction

Similar Articles

Cited By