Metabolic Equivalent in Adolescents, Active Adults and Pregnant Women.

Katarina Melzer, Juliane Heydenreich, Yves Schutz, Anne Renaud, Bengt Kayser, Urs Mäder
Author Information
  1. Katarina Melzer: Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen 2532, Switzerland. katarina.melzer@baspo.admin.ch.
  2. Juliane Heydenreich: Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen 2532, Switzerland. Juliane.Heydenreich@baspo.admin.ch.
  3. Yves Schutz: Faculty of Biology and Medicine, Department of Physiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland & Integrative Cardiovascular and Metabolic Physiology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg 1700, Switzerland. Yves.Schutz@unifr.ch.
  4. Anne Renaud: Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen 2532, Switzerland. Anne.Renaud@baspo.admin.ch.
  5. Bengt Kayser: Institute of Sports Science (ISSUL), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne 1015, Switzerland. Bengt.Kayser@unil.ch.
  6. Urs Mäder: Swiss Federal Institute of Sport, Magglingen 2532, Switzerland. Urs.Maeder@baspo.admin.ch.

Abstract

"Metabolic Equivalent" (MET) represents a standard amount of oxygen consumed by the body under resting conditions, and is defined as 3.5 mL O₂/kg × min or ~1 kcal/kg × h. It is used to express the energy cost of physical activity in multiples of MET. However, universal application of the 1-MET standard was questioned in previous studies, because it does not apply well to all individuals. Height, weight and resting metabolic rate (RMR, measured by indirect calorimetry) were measured in adolescent males (n = 50) and females (n = 50), women during pregnancy (gestation week 35-41, n = 46), women 24-53 weeks postpartum (n = 27), and active men (n = 30), and were compared to values predicted by the 1-MET standard. The RMR of adolescent males (1.28 kcal/kg × h) was significantly higher than that of adolescent females (1.11 kcal/kg × h), with or without the effects of puberty stage and physical activity levels. The RMR of the pregnant and post-pregnant subjects were not significantly different. The RMR of the active normal weight (0.92 kcal/kg × h) and overweight (0.89 kcal/kg × h) adult males were significantly lower than the 1-MET value. It follows that the 1-MET standard is inadequate for use not only in adult men and women, but also in adolescents and physically active men. It is therefore recommended that practitioners estimate RMR with equations taking into account individual characteristics, such as sex, age and Body Mass Index, and not rely on the 1-MET standard.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 Jul;68(1):66-71 [PMID: 9665098]
  2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;202(3):266.e1-6 [PMID: 20022583]
  3. J Pediatr. 1989 Jun;114(6):957-62 [PMID: 2723910]
  4. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993 Mar;57(3):353-64 [PMID: 8438769]
  5. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 Nov;54(5):788-98 [PMID: 1951148]
  6. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Jun;106(6):881-903 [PMID: 16720129]
  7. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Apr;55(4):795-801 [PMID: 1550061]
  8. J Youth Adolesc. 1988 Apr;17(2):117-33 [PMID: 24277579]
  9. Int J Obes. 1988;12(2):163-8 [PMID: 3290133]
  10. J Pediatr. 1995 Oct;127(4):571-7 [PMID: 7562278]
  11. Acta Diabetol. 1999 Sep;36(3):141-5 [PMID: 10664318]
  12. Clin Nutr. 2002 Jun;21(3):255-60 [PMID: 12127936]
  13. Public Health Nutr. 2005 Oct;8(7A):1010-27 [PMID: 16277817]
  14. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65(2):110-7 [PMID: 1396632]
  15. Eur J Pediatr. 1997 May;156(5):376-81 [PMID: 9177980]
  16. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Jul;46(7):1352-8 [PMID: 24300125]
  17. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003 Aug;62(3):621-34 [PMID: 14692598]
  18. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998 May;67(5):905-11 [PMID: 9583848]
  19. J Nutr. 2003 Jul;133(7):2356-62 [PMID: 12840206]
  20. Am J Clin Nutr. 1993 Apr;57(4):494-505 [PMID: 8460604]
  21. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994 Jan;59(1):42-7 [PMID: 8279400]
  22. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999 Feb;53(2):134-42 [PMID: 10099947]
  23. Pediatr Res. 1990 Feb;27(2):198-203 [PMID: 2314950]
  24. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995 Jan;61(1):4-10 [PMID: 7825536]
  25. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Jun;69(6):1209-16 [PMID: 10357741]
  26. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Oct;37(10):1761-7 [PMID: 16260978]
  27. Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Jul;48(1):44-9 [PMID: 3389329]
  28. J Nutr. 2006 Apr;136(4):1037-42 [PMID: 16549471]
  29. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Aug;103(2):682-92 [PMID: 17463305]
  30. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Mar;81(3):678-85 [PMID: 15755839]
  31. Arch Dis Child. 1969 Jun;44(235):291-303 [PMID: 5785179]
  32. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253 [PMID: 11234459]
  33. Arch Dis Child. 2001 Jul;85(1):73-8 [PMID: 11420210]
  34. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Aug;56(2):334-42 [PMID: 1636612]
  35. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991 Mar;53(3):612-9 [PMID: 2000814]
  36. J Nutr. 2001 Jan;131(1):53-8 [PMID: 11208938]
  37. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Dec;75(6):2514-20 [PMID: 8125870]
  38. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006 Dec;25(6):493-501 [PMID: 17229896]
  39. Br J Nutr. 1993 Jan;69(1):29-36 [PMID: 8457536]
  40. Br J Nutr. 2000 Apr;83(4):355-62 [PMID: 10858693]
  41. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Aug;56(2):343-52 [PMID: 1636613]
  42. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1575-81 [PMID: 21681120]
  43. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Mar;96(5):517-24 [PMID: 16344938]
  44. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008 Jun;62(6):704-11 [PMID: 17440515]
  45. J Nutr Sci. 2016 Mar 09;5:e7 [PMID: 27066256]
  46. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Dec 1;113(11):1763-71 [PMID: 23019315]
  47. Lancet. 1990 Jul 14;336(8707):76-8 [PMID: 1975323]
  48. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jun;79(6):1078-87 [PMID: 15159239]
  49. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Sep;99(3):1112-9 [PMID: 15831804]
  50. Arch Dis Child. 1970 Feb;45(239):13-23 [PMID: 5440182]
  51. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Nov;56(5):848-56 [PMID: 1415003]
  52. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2000 Jun;54 Suppl 3:S77-91 [PMID: 11041079]
  53. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jul;41(7):1444-51 [PMID: 19516156]
  54. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985 Jul;42(1):69-82 [PMID: 3893093]
  55. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1985;39 Suppl 1:5-41 [PMID: 4044297]
  56. Nutrition. 1990 May-Jun;6(3):213-21 [PMID: 2136000]
  57. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Aug;85(2):695-700 [PMID: 9688748]
  58. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Dec;159(2):480-1 [PMID: 21962941]
  59. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005 Apr;59(4):561-70 [PMID: 15714212]
  60. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 Apr;55(4):790-4 [PMID: 1550060]
  61. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Dec;85(6):2196-204 [PMID: 9843543]
  62. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;63(3-4):184-7 [PMID: 1761005]
  63. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 May;105(5):775-89 [PMID: 15883556]
  64. Front Physiol. 2015 Aug 11;6:226 [PMID: 26321958]
  65. CMAJ. 2006 Mar 28;174(7):961-74 [PMID: 16567757]
  66. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Sep;115(9):1417-1446.e2 [PMID: 26038298]
  67. Biol Sport. 2016 Mar;33(1):77-82 [PMID: 26929474]
  68. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999 Apr;69(4):697-704 [PMID: 10197571]
  69. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Oct;63(10):1185-91 [PMID: 19550432]
  70. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 May;113(5):1353-67 [PMID: 23224357]
  71. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 Feb;50 Suppl 1:S82-110; discussion S10-1 [PMID: 8641268]
  72. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1995 Sep;19(9):644-52 [PMID: 8574275]
  73. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Apr;81(4):799-806 [PMID: 15817855]
  74. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Sep;78(3):471-9 [PMID: 12936931]
  75. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2015 Jul;43(3):110-6 [PMID: 25906426]
  76. Pediatr Res. 1967 May;1(3):185-95 [PMID: 4965967]
  77. J Clin Invest. 1992 Sep;90(3):780-4 [PMID: 1522233]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aging
Basal Metabolism
Body Mass Index
Child
Energy Metabolism
Exercise
Female
Humans
Lactation
Male
Overweight
Oxygen Consumption
Postpartum Period
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Trimester, Third
Reproducibility of Results
Sex Characteristics
Switzerland
Thinness
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0×standardkcal/kgh1-METRMRn=womenactivemenrestingphysicalactivitymetabolicadolescentmalessignificantlyMETweightratemeasured50females1pregnant0adultadolescents"MetabolicEquivalent"representsamountoxygenconsumedbodyconditionsdefined35mLO₂/kgmin~1usedexpressenergycostmultiplesHoweveruniversalapplicationquestionedpreviousstudiesapplywellindividualsHeightindirectcalorimetrypregnancygestationweek35-414624-53weekspostpartum2730comparedvaluespredicted28higher11withouteffectspubertystagelevelspost-pregnantsubjectsdifferentnormal92overweight89lowervaluefollowsinadequateusealsophysicallythereforerecommendedpractitionersestimateequationstakingaccountindividualcharacteristicssexageBodyMassIndexrelyMetabolicEquivalentAdolescentsActiveAdultsPregnantWomenequivalent

Similar Articles

Cited By (10)