Molecular mechanisms and the conflict between courtship and aggression in three-spined sticklebacks.

Yibayiri O Sanogo, Alison M Bell
Author Information
  1. Yibayiri O Sanogo: School of Integrative Biology, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 505 S. Goodwin Ave., 433 Morrill Hall, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
  2. Alison M Bell: School of Integrative Biology, Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 505 S. Goodwin Ave., 433 Morrill Hall, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.

Abstract

In nature, animals often face conflicting demands. For example, breeding males must attract a mate but at the same time be ready to defend against rivals. The molecular mechanisms by which the brain resolves behavioural trade-offs are largely unknown. In this study, we compared the brain transcriptional responses of territorial male three-spined sticklebacks to a mating opportunity with a female and to a territorial challenge by a rival male. We focused on the diencephalon and the cerebellum, two regions of the brain implicated in courtship and aggression. There was a set of genes that were differentially expressed in response to both a courtship opportunity and a territorial challenge. Closer inspection of the direction of regulation revealed that genes that were downregulated in response to a courtship opportunity were upregulated in response to a territorial challenge and vice versa. Our study reveals some of the potential molecular mechanisms underlying behavioural trade-offs between sex and aggression, along with a possible solution to the conflict via social context-dependent gene regulation.

Keywords

Associated Data

GENBANK | GSE32961; GSE74051

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 13;104(11):4706-11 [PMID: 17360588]
  2. Behaviour. 2012 Jan 1;149(13-14):1339-1365 [PMID: 25678715]
  3. PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e363 [PMID: 16216088]
  4. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Dec 22;279(1749):4929-38 [PMID: 23097509]
  5. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2011 Aug;32(3):320-35 [PMID: 21163292]
  6. J Neuroendocrinol. 1999 Jan;11(1):19-25 [PMID: 9918225]
  7. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 22;275(1633):393-402 [PMID: 18055387]
  8. Physiol Behav. 2011 Feb 1;102(2):143-8 [PMID: 21059365]
  9. Nat Genet. 2010 Jan;42(1):77-82 [PMID: 19946270]
  10. Anim Behav. 1972 May;20(2):335-40 [PMID: 4674671]
  11. Nature. 2011 Feb 10;470(7333):221-6 [PMID: 21307935]
  12. Physiol Behav. 2008 Jan 28;93(1-2):357-63 [PMID: 17936859]
  13. Mol Brain. 2015 Feb 28;8:14 [PMID: 25888136]
  14. Neuroscientist. 2004 Jun;10(3):247-59 [PMID: 15155063]
  15. Behav Brain Res. 1999 May;101(1):167-80 [PMID: 10342406]
  16. Horm Behav. 2009 Jun;56(1):101-7 [PMID: 19341739]
  17. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Mar 1;65(5):425-31 [PMID: 18986647]
  18. Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jul;19(7):372-8 [PMID: 16701288]
  19. BMC Neurosci. 2008 Nov 13;9:111 [PMID: 19014547]
  20. Neurosci Lett. 2007 Jan 16;411(3):168-73 [PMID: 17123723]
  21. PLoS One. 2009 Dec 04;4(12):e8182 [PMID: 19997634]
  22. Horm Behav. 2005 Jun;48(1):11-22 [PMID: 15885690]
  23. PLoS Genet. 2014 May 22;10(5):e1004356 [PMID: 24852170]
  24. J Biol Chem. 2014 Feb 7;289(6):3444-56 [PMID: 24356955]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 21;109(34):13847-52 [PMID: 22872869]
  26. Brain Behav Evol. 2011;77(4):270-85 [PMID: 21677424]
  27. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 22;11:45 [PMID: 20096121]
  28. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2004;3:Article3 [PMID: 16646809]
  29. Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jan 6;166(1):110-23 [PMID: 16159671]
  30. Anim Behav. 2000 Jul;60(1):63-68 [PMID: 10924204]
  31. PLoS One. 2010 Oct 12;5(10):e13248 [PMID: 20967276]
  32. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Jun 29;877:242-57 [PMID: 10415653]
  33. Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;20(2):263-74 [PMID: 24514566]
  34. J Comp Neurol. 2011 Dec 15;519(18):3599-639 [PMID: 21800319]
  35. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 1;108(44):18020-5 [PMID: 21960440]
  36. Q Rev Biol. 2004 Sep;79(3):241-77 [PMID: 15529965]
  37. Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Jun 15;71(12):1081-9 [PMID: 22209636]
  38. Bioinformatics. 2004 Jun 12;20(9):1464-5 [PMID: 14962934]
  39. Horm Behav. 2013 Jun;64(1):103-12 [PMID: 23722238]

Grants

  1. R01 GM082937/NIGMS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Aggression
Animals
Courtship
Female
Male
Reproduction
Sexual Behavior, Animal
Smegmamorpha
Territoriality

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0territorialcourtshipmechanismsbrainbehaviouralopportunitychallengeaggressionresponsemoleculartrade-offsstudymalethree-spinedsticklebacksgenesregulationconflictgenenatureanimalsoftenfaceconflictingdemandsexamplebreedingmalesmustattractmatetimereadydefendrivalsresolveslargelyunknowncomparedtranscriptionalresponsesmatingfemalerivalfocuseddiencephaloncerebellumtworegionsimplicatedsetdifferentiallyexpressedCloserinspectiondirectionrevealeddownregulatedupregulatedviceversarevealspotentialunderlyingsexalongpossiblesolutionviasocialcontext-dependentMolecularGasterosteusaculeatussyndromeexpressionlimitedplasticitymicroarraysociogenomicsterritoriality

Similar Articles

Cited By