Normative reference values for the 20 m shuttle-run test in a population-based sample of school-aged youth in Bogota, Colombia: the FUPRECOL study.

Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, Adalberto Palacios-López, Daniel Humberto Prieto-Benavides, Jorge Enrique Correa-Bautista, Mikel Izquierdo, Alicia Alonso-Martínez, Felipe Lobelo
Author Information
  1. Robinson Ramírez-Vélez: Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.
  2. Adalberto Palacios-López: Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.
  3. Daniel Humberto Prieto-Benavides: Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.
  4. Jorge Enrique Correa-Bautista: Centro de Estudios en Medición de la Actividad Física (CEMA), Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.
  5. Mikel Izquierdo: Grupo GICAEDS, Facultad de Cultura Física, Deporte y Recreación, Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia.
  6. Alicia Alonso-Martínez: Department of Health Sciences, Public University of Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
  7. Felipe Lobelo: Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine the normative reference values of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and to establish the proportion of subjects with low CRF suggestive of future cardio-metabolic risk.
METHODS: A total of 7244 children and adolescents attending public schools in Bogota, Colombia (55.7% girls; age range of 9-17.9 years) participated in this study. We expressed CRF performance as the nearest stage (minute) completed and the estimated peak oxygen consumption (V˙O ). Smoothed percentile curves were calculated. In addition, we present the prevalence of low CRF after applying a correction factor to account for the impact of Bogota's altitude (2625 m over sea level) on CRF assessment, and we calculated the number of participants who fell below health-related FITNESSGRAM cut-points for low CRF.
RESULTS: Shuttles and V˙O were higher in boys than in girls in all age groups. In boys, there were higher levels of performance with increasing age, with most gains between the ages of 13 and 17. The proportion of subjects with a low CRF, suggestive of future cardio-metabolic risk (health risk FITNESSGRAM category) was 31.5% (28.2% for boys and 34.1% for girls; X P = .001). After applying a 1.11 altitude correction factor, the overall prevalence of low CRF was 11.5% (9.6% for boys and 13.1% for girls; X P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide sex- and age-specific normative reference standards for the 20 m shuttle-run test and estimated V˙O values in a large, population-based sample of schoolchildren from a large Latin-American city at high altitude.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Sport Sci. 2007;50:226-240 [PMID: 17387261]
  2. Int J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;36(8):624-30 [PMID: 25875317]
  3. J Phys Act Health. 2014 May;11 Suppl 1:S69-73 [PMID: 25426917]
  4. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006 Oct;160(10):1005-12 [PMID: 17018458]
  5. Int J Obes (Lond). 2014 Sep;38 Suppl 2:S57-66 [PMID: 25376221]
  6. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Oct;39(10):1504-7 [PMID: 26041699]
  7. Br J Sports Med. 2013 Jan;47(2):98-108 [PMID: 22021354]
  8. Arch Public Health. 2015 Feb 16;73(1):12 [PMID: 25780562]
  9. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005 Aug;58(8):898-909 [PMID: 16053823]
  10. Stat Med. 1992 Jul;11(10):1305-19 [PMID: 1518992]
  11. J Phys Act Health. 2012 Jul;9(5):642-9 [PMID: 21946046]
  12. Turk J Pediatr. 2004 Jan-Mar;46(1):38-43 [PMID: 15074373]
  13. J Sports Sci. 2012;30(7):679-87 [PMID: 22339646]
  14. Stat Med. 2000 Nov 15;19(21):2943-62 [PMID: 11042625]
  15. Am J Hum Biol. 2002 Nov-Dec;14(6):699-706 [PMID: 12400029]
  16. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006 May;16(4):285-93 [PMID: 16679221]
  17. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1998 Aug;69(8):793-801 [PMID: 9715971]
  18. Lancet. 2006 Jul 22;368(9532):299-304 [PMID: 16860699]
  19. Nutr Hosp. 2015 Nov 01;32(5):2184-92 [PMID: 26545676]
  20. Nutr Hosp. 2015 Nov 01;32(5):2054-61 [PMID: 26545660]
  21. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Oct;27(10):2774-81 [PMID: 23302747]
  22. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992 Dec;63(4):360-5 [PMID: 1439160]
  23. Res Sports Med. 2015;23(3):227-39 [PMID: 26114326]
  24. Br J Sports Med. 2011 Jan;45(1):20-9 [PMID: 19700434]
  25. Biomedica. 2011 Jun;31(2):242-9 [PMID: 22159541]
  26. Ann Hum Biol. 2014 May-Jun;41(3):271-6 [PMID: 24702626]
  27. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 16;10(10):e0140875 [PMID: 26474474]
  28. BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1240-3 [PMID: 10797032]
  29. Circulation. 2013 Feb 5;127(5):652-62 [PMID: 23295916]
  30. Heart. 2015 May 15;101(10):766-73 [PMID: 25489050]
  31. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2006 Sep;9(5):540-6 [PMID: 16912548]
  32. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Jun;80(6):2204-10 [PMID: 8806931]
  33. J Adolesc Health. 2010 Oct;47(4):352-9 [PMID: 20864004]
  34. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Jun;37(3):511-9 [PMID: 22515148]
  35. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Feb;61(2):123-9 [PMID: 18364180]
  36. J Phys Act Health. 2014 May;11 Suppl 1:S33-44 [PMID: 25426912]
  37. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e108053 [PMID: 25255442]
  38. Arch Dis Child. 2010 Jan;95(1):46-7 [PMID: 20040682]
  39. Int J Sports Med. 2002 May;23 Suppl 1:S8-14 [PMID: 12012256]
  40. J Pediatr. 2012 Jul;161(1):120-4 [PMID: 22364851]
  41. Am J Hum Biol. 2017 Jan;29(1): [PMID: 27500986]
  42. Scand J Public Health. 2014 Feb;42(1):67-73 [PMID: 24043396]
  43. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(16):1510-8 [PMID: 24825623]
  44. Ann Hum Biol. 1995 Nov-Dec;22(6):525-32 [PMID: 8815779]
  45. Health Rep. 2010 Mar;21(1):7-20 [PMID: 20426223]
  46. J Sch Health. 2014 Oct;84(10):625-35 [PMID: 25154526]
  47. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1990 Mar;61(1):7-19 [PMID: 2091168]
  48. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Mar;18(3):242-51 [PMID: 18083016]
  49. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2009 Feb;21(1):10-8 [PMID: 19411707]
  50. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2008 Sep;58(3):265-73 [PMID: 19137989]
  51. Diabetologia. 2007 Sep;50(9):1832-1840 [PMID: 17641870]
  52. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2012 May;24(2):157-69 [PMID: 22728409]
  53. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2014 Apr;112(2):132-40 [PMID: 24584787]
  54. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(1):36-40 [PMID: 7070255]
  55. BMJ. 2012 Nov 20;345:e7279 [PMID: 23169869]
  56. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Oct;41(4 Suppl 2):S111-6 [PMID: 21961610]
  57. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jun;41(6):1222-9 [PMID: 19461545]
  58. Sports Med. 2003;33(4):285-300 [PMID: 12688827]
  59. Med Sport Sci. 2007;50:168-182 [PMID: 17387257]
  60. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Jan;32(1):1-11 [PMID: 18043605]
  61. J Sports Sci. 2006 Oct;24(10):1025-38 [PMID: 17115514]
  62. Int J Sports Med. 2007 Apr;28(4):314-20 [PMID: 17024618]
  63. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 24;95(24):14009-14 [PMID: 9826643]
  64. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Oct;41(4 Suppl 2):S124-30 [PMID: 21961612]
  65. Arch Dis Child. 1976 Mar;51(3):170-9 [PMID: 952550]
  66. Ann Hum Biol. 1997 Jan-Feb;24(1):19-31 [PMID: 9022903]
  67. J Sci Med Sport. 2011 Jan;14(1):79-84 [PMID: 20727823]
  68. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Jul;31(7):1172-8 [PMID: 17310222]
  69. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Apr;2(4):321-332 [PMID: 24703050]
  70. J Sports Sci. 1988 Summer;6(2):93-101 [PMID: 3184250]
  71. Int J Sports Med. 2010 Jul;31(7):490-7 [PMID: 20432194]
  72. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1984 Jun;9(2):64-9 [PMID: 6733834]
  73. Pediatr Res. 2013 May;73(5):692-7 [PMID: 23417036]
  74. Am J Hum Biol. 1994;6(4):451-455 [PMID: 28548259]
  75. JAMA. 2009 May 20;301(19):2024-35 [PMID: 19454641]
  76. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014 Dec;54(6):780-92 [PMID: 25350035]

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Child
Colombia
Exercise Test
Female
Humans
Male
Reference Values

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CRFlowgirlsboysnormativereferencevaluesriskageV˙Oaltitudemcardiorespiratoryfitnessproportionsubjectssuggestivefuturecardio-metabolicchildrenBogota9studyperformanceestimatedcalculatedprevalenceapplyingcorrectionfactorFITNESSGRAMhigher135%1%XP = 0011120shuttle-runtestlargepopulation-basedsampleOBJECTIVES:aimdetermineestablishMETHODS:total7244adolescentsattendingpublicschoolsColombia557%range9-17yearsparticipatedexpressedneareststageminutecompletedpeakoxygenconsumptionSmoothedpercentilecurvesadditionpresentaccountimpactBogota's2625sealevelassessmentnumberparticipantsfellhealth-relatedcut-pointsRESULTS:Shuttlesgroupslevelsincreasinggainsages17healthcategory31282%341overall6%CONCLUSIONS:resultsprovidesex-age-specificstandardsschoolchildrenLatin-AmericancityhighNormativeschool-agedyouthColombia:FUPRECOLadolescentdatapercentiles

Similar Articles

Cited By