Robustness of IPSA optimized high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans to catheter displacements.

Joel Poder, May Whitaker
Author Information
  1. Joel Poder: Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
  2. May Whitaker: Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) optimized brachytherapy treatment plans are characterized with large isolated dwell times at the first or last dwell position of each catheter. The potential of catheter shifts relative to the target and organs at risk in these plans may lead to a more significant change in delivered dose to the volumes of interest relative to plans with more uniform dwell times.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study aims to determine if the Nucletron Oncentra dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameter can be optimized to improve the robustness of high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy plans to catheter displacements. A set of 10 clinically acceptable prostate plans were re-optimized with a DTDC parameter of 0 and 0.4. For each plan, catheter displacements of 3, 7, and 14 mm were retrospectively applied and the change in dose volume histogram (DVH) indices and conformity indices analyzed.
RESULTS: The robustness of clinically acceptable prostate plans to catheter displacements in the caudal direction was found to be dependent on the DTDC parameter. A DTDC value of 0 improves the robustness of planning target volume (PTV) coverage to catheter displacements, whereas a DTDC value of 0.4 improves the robustness of the plans to changes in hotspots.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that if used in conjunction with a pre-treatment catheter displacement correction protocol and a tolerance of 3 mm, a DTDC value of 0.4 may produce clinically superior plans. However, the effect of the DTDC parameter in plan robustness was not observed to be as strong as initially suspected.

Keywords

References

  1. ISRN Oncol. 2014 Jan 23;2014:125020 [PMID: 24587919]
  2. Science. 1983 May 13;220(4598):671-80 [PMID: 17813860]
  3. Brachytherapy. 2015 Mar-Apr;14(2):279-88 [PMID: 25447341]
  4. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 15;76(4):1066-72 [PMID: 19616901]
  5. Radiother Oncol. 2003 Sep;68(3):285-8 [PMID: 13129636]
  6. Med Phys. 2001 May;28(5):773-9 [PMID: 11393472]
  7. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Nov 08;15(6):5055 [PMID: 25493531]
  8. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2015 Mar;38(1):55-61 [PMID: 25481387]
  9. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Sep 1;54(1):86-100 [PMID: 12182978]
  10. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007 Sep 17;8(4):1-13 [PMID: 18449148]
  11. Brachytherapy. 2011 Jul-Aug;10(4):299-305 [PMID: 21190903]
  12. Eur J Cancer. 2005 Apr;41(6):908-21 [PMID: 15808957]
  13. Med Phys. 1988 Jan-Feb;15(1):104-7 [PMID: 3352544]
  14. Med Phys. 2011 Sep;38(9):4982-93 [PMID: 21978042]
  15. BJU Int. 2011 Dec;108(11):1734-8 [PMID: 21507185]
  16. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Feb 1;37(3):731-6 [PMID: 9112473]
  17. Radiother Oncol. 2011 Dec;101(3):490-4 [PMID: 21889221]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0planscatheterDTDCrobustnessprostatedisplacements0brachytherapydwellparameterIPSAoptimizedclinically4valueplanningtreatmenttimesrelativetargetmaychangedosehigh-dose-rateacceptableplan3mmvolumeindicesimprovesdisplacementPURPOSE:InversesimulatedannealingcharacterizedlargeisolatedfirstlastpositionpotentialshiftsorgansriskleadsignificantdeliveredvolumesinterestuniformMATERIALANDMETHODS:studyaimsdetermineNucletronOncentratimedeviationconstraintcanimproveHDRset10re-optimized714retrospectivelyappliedhistogramDVHconformityanalyzedRESULTS:caudaldirectionfounddependentPTVcoveragewhereaschangeshotspotsCONCLUSIONS:resultsindicateusedconjunctionpre-treatmentcorrectionprotocoltoleranceproducesuperiorHowevereffectobservedstronginitiallysuspectedRobustnesscancer

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)